Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to collect disease burden of OA and the effectiveness and patient satisfaction of treatment by Etoricoxib in the normal practice setting.
Interventions
etoricoxib 60 mg QD for 4 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Must Be Over 20 Years Of Age, Regardless Of Sex * Must Have A Diagnosis Of OA That Requiring Treatment * Patients Must Have Taken an NSAID, Cox-2 Or Opioids On The Majority Of Days During The Last 4 Weeks Before Enrollment Who Are Intolerant (Due To Gastrointestinal Adverse Events) Or Inadequately Respond To Current Therapy (Vas \>= 40 mm On A Pain Scale From 0-100 mm) * Excluding Osteoarthritis, The Patient Is Judged To Be In Otherwise General Good Health Based On Medical History, Physical Examination, And Routine Laboratory Tests * Must Agree To Participate Voluntarily In The Study * Must Have The Capacity To Understand And Answer The Questionnaires Used In The Study * Must Agree To Return For A Follow-Up Visit With The Treating Physician Four Weeks After The Initiation Of Treatment With Etoricoxib * Patient Is Willing To Sign Informed Consent Form
Exclusion criteria
* Under 20 Years Of Age * Severe Hepatic Insufficiency (Child-Pugh Score \> 9) * Advanced Renal Insufficiency (Creatinine Clearance \< 30 Ml/Min) * Any Contraindication Or Warning Or Precaution As Mentioned In The Approved Study Drug Package Insert * Gi Ulcer With Active Bleeding Present At Study Enrollment * Patient Has A Recent History Of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction Or Transient Ischemic Attack (Within The Previous 2 Years)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4 | Baseline and end of week 4 | WOMAC for pain assessment by patient (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 represent no pain and 100 represent extreme pain) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | Baseline | The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at baseline were collected. |
| Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | Week 4 | The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at week 4 were collected. |
| Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Baseline | The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[Not present, moderate and extreme\] for discomfort and anxiety/depression. |
| Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Week 4 | The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[ Not present, moderate and extreme\]for discomfort and anxiety/depression |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 | The change from baseline in 3 domain scores (pain, stiffness, and difficult in doing daily activity) of WOMAC at week 4 were measured. Each domain comprises of questions and VAS scales for scoring. For pain domain, 0 represents no pain and 100 represents extreme pain; for stiffness domain, 0 represents no stiffness and 100 represents extreme stiffness; for difficult in doing daily activity domain, 0 represents no difficulty and 100 represents most difficulty. |
| Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 | TSQM consists of four domains (effectiveness; side effect; convenience and overall satisfaction), domain scores ranged from 0 (0=worst) to 100 (100=best) were derived from converting the original Likert's scales to VAS scale. |
| Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 | Weighted scores of the 8 domains of SF36 (i.e., physical functioning; role limiting due to physical problem; bodily pain; general health; vitality; social functioning; role limiting due to emotional problem; mental health) were scored on a scale from 0 \ 100, with 100 representing the best possible functioning) |
| Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | Baseline and Week 4 | BPI consists of pain and pain interference domains. For pain (0=no pain to 10=extreme pain); for pain interference ( 0=no interference to 10= greatest interference). |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Etoricoxib Etoricoxib 60 mg once a day (q.d.) | 500 |
| Total | 500 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 15 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 28 |
| Overall Study | Other | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 27 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Etoricoxib |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Bodily pain | 52.4 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.9 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 General health | 52.7 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.5 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Mental health | 61.7 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 66.3 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Physical functional | 45.1 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.3 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Role limitation due to emotional problem | 41.3 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.6 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Role limitation due to physical problem | 24.0 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.5 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Social functioning | 69.0 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.3 |
| Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores SF-36 Vitality | 55.9 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 365 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 135 Participants |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI-Average pain | 4.9 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI - Enjoyment of life | 3.0 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI -Interference on general activities | 2.9 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI -Least pain | 3.2 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI - Mood | 3.2 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI - Normal work | 4.2 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI -Pain right now | 4.4 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI- Relations with other people | 2.5 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI - Sleep | 3.3 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI -Walking | 4.3 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 |
| The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores BPI -Worst pain | 6.4 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 |
| The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale WOMAC Pain subscale | 38.5 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.9 |
| The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale WOMAC Physical Function subscale | 38.0 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8 |
| The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale WOMAC Stiffness subscale | 36.3 Units on a Scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.9 |
| TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores TSQM - Convenience | 68.0 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 68.8 |
| TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores TSQM - Effectiveness | 52.1 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.6 |
| TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores TSQM - Overall satisfaction | 44.1 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.7 |
| TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores TSQM - Side effect | 56.9 Units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.7 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 82 / 500 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 500 |
Outcome results
The Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4
WOMAC for pain assessment by patient (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 represent no pain and 100 represent extreme pain)
Time frame: Baseline and end of week 4
Population: Per protocol (all patients who completed the WOMACpain walking on a flat surface question at baseline and follow up visit at week 4 will be included for analysis of this endpoint.~Among the 419 patients with follow up visit data, 27 patients rated 0 in their VAS pain score at baseline and were excluded from this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | The Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4 | 52.04 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: Only patients with both baseline and week 4 data were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4 | Days Missed From Work (n=138) | -0.4 Days | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4 | Days Missed From Housekeeping Work (n=411) | -2.3 Days | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4
Weighted scores of the 8 domains of SF36 (i.e., physical functioning; role limiting due to physical problem; bodily pain; general health; vitality; social functioning; role limiting due to emotional problem; mental health) were scored on a scale from 0 \ 100, with 100 representing the best possible functioning)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: Intention to treat (ITT)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Physical Functioning (n=418) | 5.2 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Role Limiting Due to Physical Problem (n=418) | 17.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 49.3 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Bodily Pain (n=418) | 10.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 General Health (n=419) | 2.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Vitality (n=417) | 1.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Social Functioning (n=419) | 8.7 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Role Limiting Due to Emotional Problem(n=418) | 14.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 50.4 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4 | SF36 Mental Health (n=417) | 4.4 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4
BPI consists of pain and pain interference domains. For pain (0=no pain to 10=extreme pain); for pain interference ( 0=no interference to 10= greatest interference).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: Only patients with both baseline and week 4 follow up data were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Worst pain (n=418) | -1.5 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Least pain (n=417) | -0.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Average pain (n=419) | -1.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Pain right now (n=416) | -1.3 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on general activities (n=419) | -0.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Mood (n=419) | -1.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Walking (n=419) | -1.2 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Normal work (n=419) | -1.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Relations (n=418) | -0.6 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Sleep (n=419) | -1.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Etoricoxib | Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4 | BPI Interference on Enjoyment of life(n=419) | -0.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4
TSQM consists of four domains (effectiveness; side effect; convenience and overall satisfaction), domain scores ranged from 0 (0=worst) to 100 (100=best) were derived from converting the original Likert's scales to VAS scale.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: 22 patients who reported side effects at baseline and week 4 were included in side effect evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Effectiveness ((n=418) | 2.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Etoricoxib | Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Side Effect (n=22) | -3.8 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Etoricoxib | Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Convenience (n=418) | 0.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Etoricoxib | Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4 | Overall (n=419) | 1.1 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4
The change from baseline in 3 domain scores (pain, stiffness, and difficult in doing daily activity) of WOMAC at week 4 were measured. Each domain comprises of questions and VAS scales for scoring. For pain domain, 0 represents no pain and 100 represents extreme pain; for stiffness domain, 0 represents no stiffness and 100 represents extreme stiffness; for difficult in doing daily activity domain, 0 represents no difficulty and 100 represents most difficulty.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included in this analysis of change
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4 | WOMAC Pain subscale (n=418) | -10.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Etoricoxib | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4 | WOMAC Stiffness subscale (n=418) | -7.9 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Etoricoxib | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4 | WOMAC Physical Function subscale (n=416) | -8.0 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline
The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[Not present, moderate and extreme\] for discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included in the analysis.~Week 4 N Values; Motility 423 , Self care 422 , Daily Activity 421 , Pain/Discomfort 421 , Anxiety/Depressed 422
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Daily activity (n=499) No problem | 54.91 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Daily activity (n=499) Some problem | 43.69 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Motility (n=499) No problem | 54.91 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Motility (n=499) Some problem | 45.09 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Motility (n=499) Not able to carry out | 0.00 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Self care (n=499) No problem | 86.97 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Self care (n=499) Some problem | 12.63 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Self care (n=499) Not able to carry out | 0.40 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Daily activity (n=499) Not able to carry out | 1.40 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Pain/Discomfort (n=500) Not present | 10.00 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Pain/Discomfort (n=500) Moderate | 79.60 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Pain/Discomfort (n=500) Extreme | 10.40 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Anxiety/Depressed (n=500) Not present | 51.60 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Anxiety/Depressed (n=500) Moderate | 44.00 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline | Anxiety/Depressed (n=500) Extreme | 4.40 Percentage of Participants |
Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4
The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[ Not present, moderate and extreme\]for discomfort and anxiety/depression
Time frame: Week 4
Population: per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Motility (n=423) No problem | 67.61 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Motility (n=423) Some problem | 32.39 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Motility (n=423) Not able to carry out | 0.00 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Self care (n=422) No problem | 90.05 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Self care (n=422) Some problem | 9.48 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Self care (n=422) Not able to carry out | 0.47 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Daily activity (n=421) No problem | 61.76 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Daily activity (n=421) Some problem | 37.29 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Daily activity (n=421) Not able to carry out | 0.95 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Not present | 23.04 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Moderate | 73.63 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Extreme | 3.33 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Not present | 61.37 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Moderate | 36.97 Percentage of participants |
| Etoricoxib | Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4 | Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Extreme | 1.66 Percentage of participants |
Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)
The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at baseline were collected.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | Poor Response | 57.60 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | No Response | 4.40 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | Fair Response | 36.40 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | Good Response | 1.60 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy) | Excellent Response | 0.00 Percentage of Participants |
Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART
The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at week 4 were collected.
Time frame: Week 4
Population: Per Protocol
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | No response | 5.81 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | Poor response | 16.05 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | Fair response | 35.35 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | Good response | 36.74 Percentage of Participants |
| Etoricoxib | Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART | Excellent response | 6.05 Percentage of Participants |