Skip to content

Patient-Reported Effectiveness and Safety of Etoricoxib in Osteoarthritis (OA)(0663-113)

Patient-reported Outcomes With Etoricoxib in Real Life

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00757627
Enrollment
500
Registered
2008-09-23
Start date
2007-12-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to collect disease burden of OA and the effectiveness and patient satisfaction of treatment by Etoricoxib in the normal practice setting.

Interventions

DRUGetoricoxib

etoricoxib 60 mg QD for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must Be Over 20 Years Of Age, Regardless Of Sex * Must Have A Diagnosis Of OA That Requiring Treatment * Patients Must Have Taken an NSAID, Cox-2 Or Opioids On The Majority Of Days During The Last 4 Weeks Before Enrollment Who Are Intolerant (Due To Gastrointestinal Adverse Events) Or Inadequately Respond To Current Therapy (Vas \>= 40 mm On A Pain Scale From 0-100 mm) * Excluding Osteoarthritis, The Patient Is Judged To Be In Otherwise General Good Health Based On Medical History, Physical Examination, And Routine Laboratory Tests * Must Agree To Participate Voluntarily In The Study * Must Have The Capacity To Understand And Answer The Questionnaires Used In The Study * Must Agree To Return For A Follow-Up Visit With The Treating Physician Four Weeks After The Initiation Of Treatment With Etoricoxib * Patient Is Willing To Sign Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

* Under 20 Years Of Age * Severe Hepatic Insufficiency (Child-Pugh Score \> 9) * Advanced Renal Insufficiency (Creatinine Clearance \< 30 Ml/Min) * Any Contraindication Or Warning Or Precaution As Mentioned In The Approved Study Drug Package Insert * Gi Ulcer With Active Bleeding Present At Study Enrollment * Patient Has A Recent History Of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction Or Transient Ischemic Attack (Within The Previous 2 Years)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4Baseline and end of week 4WOMAC for pain assessment by patient (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 represent no pain and 100 represent extreme pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)BaselineThe IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at baseline were collected.
Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTWeek 4The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at week 4 were collected.
Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineBaselineThe percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[Not present, moderate and extreme\] for discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Week 4The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[ Not present, moderate and extreme\]for discomfort and anxiety/depression
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4Baseline and Week 4The change from baseline in 3 domain scores (pain, stiffness, and difficult in doing daily activity) of WOMAC at week 4 were measured. Each domain comprises of questions and VAS scales for scoring. For pain domain, 0 represents no pain and 100 represents extreme pain; for stiffness domain, 0 represents no stiffness and 100 represents extreme stiffness; for difficult in doing daily activity domain, 0 represents no difficulty and 100 represents most difficulty.
Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4Baseline and Week 4TSQM consists of four domains (effectiveness; side effect; convenience and overall satisfaction), domain scores ranged from 0 (0=worst) to 100 (100=best) were derived from converting the original Likert's scales to VAS scale.
Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4Baseline and Week 4Weighted scores of the 8 domains of SF36 (i.e., physical functioning; role limiting due to physical problem; bodily pain; general health; vitality; social functioning; role limiting due to emotional problem; mental health) were scored on a scale from 0 \ 100, with 100 representing the best possible functioning)
Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4Baseline and Week 4BPI consists of pain and pain interference domains. For pain (0=no pain to 10=extreme pain); for pain interference ( 0=no interference to 10= greatest interference).

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etoricoxib
Etoricoxib 60 mg once a day (q.d.)
500
Total500

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event15
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up28
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtoricoxib
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Bodily pain
52.4 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.9
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 General health
52.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.5
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Mental health
61.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 66.3
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Physical functional
45.1 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 51.3
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Role limitation due to emotional problem
41.3 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.6
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Role limitation due to physical problem
24.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.5
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Social functioning
69.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78.3
Patient-SF36 (Short form 36) domain scores
SF-36 Vitality
55.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
365 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
135 Participants
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI-Average pain
4.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI - Enjoyment of life
3.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI -Interference on general activities
2.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI -Least pain
3.2 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI - Mood
3.2 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI - Normal work
4.2 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI -Pain right now
4.4 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI- Relations with other people
2.5 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI - Sleep
3.3 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI -Walking
4.3 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
The mean of patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) scores
BPI -Worst pain
6.4 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale
WOMAC Pain subscale
38.5 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.9
The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale
WOMAC Physical Function subscale
38.0 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
The mean of patient WOMAC ( Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) subscale
WOMAC Stiffness subscale
36.3 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.9
TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores
TSQM - Convenience
68.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 68.8
TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores
TSQM - Effectiveness
52.1 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.6
TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores
TSQM - Overall satisfaction
44.1 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.7
TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication )domain scores
TSQM - Side effect
56.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 500
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 500

Outcome results

Primary

The Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4

WOMAC for pain assessment by patient (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 represent no pain and 100 represent extreme pain)

Time frame: Baseline and end of week 4

Population: Per protocol (all patients who completed the WOMACpain walking on a flat surface question at baseline and follow up visit at week 4 will be included for analysis of this endpoint.~Among the 419 patients with follow up visit data, 27 patients rated 0 in their VAS pain score at baseline and were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtoricoxibThe Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥30% Decrease From Baseline in Pain Intensity as Measured by WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Question 1 Pain Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 452.04 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Only patients with both baseline and week 4 data were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4Days Missed From Work (n=138)-0.4 DaysStandard Deviation 1.6
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Number of Days Patient Miss From Work or House Keeping Work at Week 4Days Missed From Housekeeping Work (n=411)-2.3 DaysStandard Deviation 6.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4

Weighted scores of the 8 domains of SF36 (i.e., physical functioning; role limiting due to physical problem; bodily pain; general health; vitality; social functioning; role limiting due to emotional problem; mental health) were scored on a scale from 0 \ 100, with 100 representing the best possible functioning)

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Physical Functioning (n=418)5.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.9
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Role Limiting Due to Physical Problem (n=418)17.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 49.3
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Bodily Pain (n=418)10.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.7
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 General Health (n=419)2.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.2
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Vitality (n=417)1.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.1
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Social Functioning (n=419)8.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.3
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Role Limiting Due to Emotional Problem(n=418)14.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 50.4
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline in Patient-SF36 (Short Form 36) Domain Scores at Week 4SF36 Mental Health (n=417)4.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Change From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4

BPI consists of pain and pain interference domains. For pain (0=no pain to 10=extreme pain); for pain interference ( 0=no interference to 10= greatest interference).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Only patients with both baseline and week 4 follow up data were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Worst pain (n=418)-1.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.4
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Least pain (n=417)-0.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.2
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Average pain (n=419)-1.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Pain right now (n=416)-1.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.6
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on general activities (n=419)-0.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.5
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Mood (n=419)-1.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.7
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Walking (n=419)-1.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.5
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Normal work (n=419)-1.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.8
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Relations (n=418)-0.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.6
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Sleep (n=419)-1.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.8
EtoricoxibChange From Baseline of Patient BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Scores at Week 4BPI Interference on Enjoyment of life(n=419)-0.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Changes From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4

TSQM consists of four domains (effectiveness; side effect; convenience and overall satisfaction), domain scores ranged from 0 (0=worst) to 100 (100=best) were derived from converting the original Likert's scales to VAS scale.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: 22 patients who reported side effects at baseline and week 4 were included in side effect evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtoricoxibChanges From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4Effectiveness ((n=418)2.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17
EtoricoxibChanges From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4Side Effect (n=22)-3.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.4
EtoricoxibChanges From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4Convenience (n=418)0.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.8
EtoricoxibChanges From Baseline in Patient TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) Domain Scores at Week 4Overall (n=419)1.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4

The change from baseline in 3 domain scores (pain, stiffness, and difficult in doing daily activity) of WOMAC at week 4 were measured. Each domain comprises of questions and VAS scales for scoring. For pain domain, 0 represents no pain and 100 represents extreme pain; for stiffness domain, 0 represents no stiffness and 100 represents extreme stiffness; for difficult in doing daily activity domain, 0 represents no difficulty and 100 represents most difficulty.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included in this analysis of change

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtoricoxibMean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4WOMAC Pain subscale (n=418)-10.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.5
EtoricoxibMean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4WOMAC Stiffness subscale (n=418)-7.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 25.7
EtoricoxibMean Change From Baseline in Patient WOMAC Domain Scores at Week 4WOMAC Physical Function subscale (n=416)-8.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Secondary

Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Baseline

The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[Not present, moderate and extreme\] for discomfort and anxiety/depression.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included in the analysis.~Week 4 N Values; Motility 423 , Self care 422 , Daily Activity 421 , Pain/Discomfort 421 , Anxiety/Depressed 422

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineDaily activity (n=499) No problem54.91 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineDaily activity (n=499) Some problem43.69 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineMotility (n=499) No problem54.91 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineMotility (n=499) Some problem45.09 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineMotility (n=499) Not able to carry out0.00 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineSelf care (n=499) No problem86.97 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineSelf care (n=499) Some problem12.63 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineSelf care (n=499) Not able to carry out0.40 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineDaily activity (n=499) Not able to carry out1.40 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselinePain/Discomfort (n=500) Not present10.00 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselinePain/Discomfort (n=500) Moderate79.60 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselinePain/Discomfort (n=500) Extreme10.40 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineAnxiety/Depressed (n=500) Not present51.60 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineAnxiety/Depressed (n=500) Moderate44.00 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at BaselineAnxiety/Depressed (n=500) Extreme4.40 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Patient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4

The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 3 categories of EQ-5D at baseline and at week 4 were collected.The EQ-5D comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression) to be answered using a 3-categorical Likert's scales of: \[No problem, Some problem, and Not able to carry out\] for mobility, self-care and usual activities and \[ Not present, moderate and extreme\]for discomfort and anxiety/depression

Time frame: Week 4

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Motility (n=423) No problem67.61 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Motility (n=423) Some problem32.39 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Motility (n=423) Not able to carry out0.00 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Self care (n=422) No problem90.05 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Self care (n=422) Some problem9.48 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Self care (n=422) Not able to carry out0.47 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Daily activity (n=421) No problem61.76 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Daily activity (n=421) Some problem37.29 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Daily activity (n=421) Not able to carry out0.95 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Not present23.04 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Moderate73.63 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Pain/Discomfort (n=421) Extreme3.33 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Not present61.37 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Moderate36.97 Percentage of participants
EtoricoxibPatient Assessment of General Health Outcome by EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 4Anxiety/Depressed (n=422) Extreme1.66 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)

The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants who met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at baseline were collected.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Only patients with baseline and week 4 data were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)Poor Response57.60 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)No Response4.40 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)Fair Response36.40 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)Good Response1.60 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Baseline Using IGART (Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy)Excellent Response0.00 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Physicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGART

The IGART comprised of five categories: No response, poor response, fair response, good response, and excellent response. The percentage of participants met the criteria of any of the 5 categories at week 4 were collected.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Per Protocol

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTNo response5.81 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTPoor response16.05 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTFair response35.35 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTGood response36.74 Percentage of Participants
EtoricoxibPhysicians' Global Assessment of Patients' Response to Therapy at Week 4 Using IGARTExcellent response6.05 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026