Skip to content

Taperloc Versus Taplerloc Microplasty

Clinical Evaluation of Taperloc Total Hip System With Two Different Stem Lengths

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00757107
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-09-22
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2016-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Short femoral stem, Stress shielding, Stem migration, Implant Survival, DEXA, Radiostereometric analysis

Brief summary

This evaluation is conducted to evaluate the safety and performance of two different stem lengths of the Taperloc Total Hip System. Per implant bone loss and migration of the stem are compared between the two groups with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and radiostereomektric analysis

Detailed description

Consecutive patients between 50 - 70 years diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis of the hip and eligible for total hip arthroplasty will be asked to participate in the study. Periprosthetic bone loss, migration of the components and clinical scores will be recorded prospectively at 3,6,12 and 24 months.

Interventions

DEVICETaperloc Microplasty

primary total hip arthroplasty

DEVICETaperloc standard

primary total hip arthroplasty

Sponsors

Biomet U.K. Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ingemar Ivarsson
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip scheduled for THA. * Suitable anatomy for both stems * Willingness and ability to follow study-protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Malignancy or metastatic bone disease. * Any other disease severely affecting bone and mineral metabolism * Ongoing or previous treatment (within 5 years prior to inclusion) with steroids * Ongoing or previous treatment (within 5 years prior to inclusion) with antiresorptives. * Ongoing or previous treatment (within 5 years prior to inclusion) with immunosuppressive drugs. * Ongoing or previous treatment (within 5 years prior to inclusion) with anticonvulsive therapy. * Ongoing or previous treatment (within 5 years prior to inclusion) with hormonal therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bone remodelling, i e change in bone mineral density around the stem, as measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) [ Time Frame:bone mineral density (BMD) measured postoperatively at 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Migration of stem components in six degrees of freedom and maximum total point motion measured with radiostereometric analysis2 years

Other

MeasureTime frame
Clinical outcome measures with Harris Hip Score comparing patients receiving different stems.3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Clinical outcome measures with Womac Score comparing patients receiving different stems.3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026