Skip to content

A Comparison of the Effects of Intraoperative Administration of Metoprolol or Esmolol on General Anesthetic Requirement

A Comparison of the Effect of Intraoperative Administration of Metoprolol or Esmolol on General Anesthetic Requirement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00756236
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-09-22
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2015-09-02
Last updated
2017-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Brief summary

We will compare three study groups receiving metoprolol, esmolol, or placebo. Level of anesthesia will be titrated to achieve the same range of BIS value in all groups. Our hypothesis is that the metoprolol and esmolol groups will require a lower level of anesthetic agent to achieve the targeted BIS range, compared to the placebo group. Our objective is to clarify if metoprolol, in a dose range used for perioperative cardiac protection, decreases anesthetic requirement.

Detailed description

Beta-receptor antagonists are commonly used in the perioperative setting. These agents have been shown to decrease the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia and are recommended by a recent practice guideline in certain patient groups.1 Besides protection from ischemia, there are other situations where beta-receptor antagonists are used intraoperatively such as control of the sympathetic response to tracheal intubation and certain types of surgical stimuli. There is new evidence suggesting that administration of esmolol, a short-acting beta-receptor antagonist, might reduce the actual anesthetic requirement. This was initially shown by studies in which esmolol decreased the amount of anesthetic required to prevent movement after skin incision.2;3 Subsequent studies used bispectral index (BIS) as an endpoint and demonstrated decreased BIS values in subjects receiving esmolol during general anesthesia. 4;5 This anesthetic-sparing effect observed with esmolol has not been prospectively studied with other beta-receptor antagonists. Since perioperative beta-blockade is commonly achieved using longer acting agents such as metoprolol or atenolol, it is clinically relevant to understand the effects of these medications on anesthetic requirement. We aim to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the anesthetic-sparing effect of metoprolol and esmolol administered intraoperatively.

Interventions

DRUGMetoprolol

60ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl, 5ml syringes of metoprolol at 1mg/ml concentration

DRUGEsmolol

60ml syringes of esmolol at 10 mg/ml concentration, 5ml syringes of 0.9% of NaCl

DRUGP-Group

0.9%NaCl dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes

Sponsors

University of Oklahoma
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being older than 18 but, not older than 75 * Scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia * Duration of surgery scheduled as 2 hours or longer

Exclusion criteria

* Intracranial or intrathoracic surgery (due to difficulty using a BIS monitor or frequent need for beta-receptor antagonism) * Indication for perioperative beta-receptor antagonism * Current use of calcium-channel antagonists * History of coronary artery disease * History of reactive airway disease * History of diabetes or other disorders of glucose metabolism * Reported allergy to any of the study drugs * Reported substance abuse (except nicotine and caffeine) * Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor drugs * Hypersensitivity to metoprolol, esmolol and related derivatives, or to any of the excipients of either. * Hypersensitivity to other beta-blockers (cross-sensitivity between beta-blockers can occur). * Sick-sinus Syndrome. * Heart block greater than first degree, cardiogenic shock, and overt cardiac failure. * Significant first-degree heart block (P-R interval greater than or equal to 0.24 sec; systolic pressure \< 100mmHg; or moderate- to-severe cardiac failure). * Severe peripheral arterial circulatory disorders. * Pheochromocytoma. * Baseline heart rate of \< 60 * Systolic pressure less than 100 mm Hg * Pregnant women * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First HourEvery 5 minutes for 2 hoursWe will measure the amount of Sevoflurane used to achieve the same level Bispectral Index. Each patient will have their percentage of sevoflurane in expired breath measured every 5 minutes for 2 hours, resulting in 24 data points per person. The primary endpoint will be area under the curve (AUC) for each subject for the first hour.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were consented at the pre-surgical clinical visit if they were outpatients. Inpatients were consented while they were in the hospital. Each patient were provided with a copy of the informed consent and be given at least 12 hours to make a decision.

Pre-assignment details

Group assignments were randomized by a pharmacist who also prepared the study drugs. Investigators and subjects were blinded to the group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
M-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to Metoprolol Group. The drug was dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl and 1mg/ml Metoprolol. Investigators and patients were blinded to the group assignment. Metoprolol: 60ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl, 5ml syringes of metoprolol at 1mg/ml concentration
20
E-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to Esmolol Group. The drug was dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes of 0.9% NaCl and 10mg/ml Esmolol. Investigators and patients were blinded to the group assignment. Esmolol: 60ml syringes of esmolol at 10 mg/ml concentration, 5ml syringes of 0.9% of NaCl
20
P-Group
Patients were randomly assigned to this group. Patients received 0.9% NaCl only. To maintain the blind, 0.9% NaCl was also dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes. P-Group: 0.9%NaCl dispensed in 60ml & 5ml syringes
20
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicM-GroupP-GroupE-GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants17 Participants18 Participants55 Participants
Age, Continuous44 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
48 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
49 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
46.8 YEARS
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants20 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants14 Participants17 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants3 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First Hour

We will measure the amount of Sevoflurane used to achieve the same level Bispectral Index. Each patient will have their percentage of sevoflurane in expired breath measured every 5 minutes for 2 hours, resulting in 24 data points per person. The primary endpoint will be area under the curve (AUC) for each subject for the first hour.

Time frame: Every 5 minutes for 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
M-GroupArea Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First Hour1.77 percent*hourStandard Deviation 0.38
E-GroupArea Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First Hour1.46 percent*hourStandard Deviation 0.29
P-GroupArea Under the Curve of etSEV Over the First Hour1.73 percent*hourStandard Deviation 0.47

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026