Skip to content

Study of Gabapentin Extended Release (G-ER) in the Treatment of Vasomotor (Hot Flashes/Hot Flushes) Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin Extended Release (G-ER) Tablets in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00755417
Enrollment
541
Registered
2008-09-19
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2012-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hot Flashes

Keywords

Hot flashes, Hot flushes, Postmenopausal symptoms, Vasomotor symptoms

Brief summary

Depomed's Gabapentin Extended Release (G-ER) is an investigational, extended release formulation of gabapentin that is being studied for the treatment of hot flashes in postmenopausal women.

Detailed description

The primary study objective is to assess the efficacy of G-ER dosed in either of the following regimens: * G-ER 1200 mg daily (single evening dose) * G-ER 1800 mg daily (dosed asymmetrically; 600 mg in AM/1200 mg in PM) compared to placebo in reducing the average daily frequency and severity score of moderate to severe hot flashes in postmenopausal women after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment with a stable dose, compared with the baseline week.

Interventions

G-ER 1200 mg daily dosage given as two 600-mg tablets.

G-ER 1800 mg daily dosage given as one 600-mg tablet in the morning and two 600-mg tablets in the evening.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo dosages of 1200 mg daily (two 600-mg tablets) and 1800 mg daily (one 600-mg tablet in the morning and two 600-mg tablets in the evening).

Sponsors

Depomed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Postmenopausal women aged 18 to 70 years experiencing ≥7 moderate to severe hot flashes per day (or ≥50 per week) accompanied by sweating during previous 30 days or longer. 2. Had amenorrhea for ≥12 months, amenorrhea for 6 to 12 months with serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels \>40 mIU/mL, or was ≥6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy. 3. Willing to discontinue the following: vaginal hormonal products; transdermal or oral estrogen or estrogen/progestin combination; intrauterine progestin; progestin implants; injectable estrogen; topical progesterone cream. 4. Had to have daily average of ≥7 moderate to severe hot flashes and had to complete ≥4 days of diary entries during baseline week to be randomized. 5. If treated with antidepressants, could not have had any changes in drug doses during past month. Other Inclusions apply.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient treated with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist, anti-estrogens, or aromatase inhibitors within 2 months prior to study entry. 2. Patient treated with estrogen pellets or progestin injectable drugs within 6 months prior to study entry. 3. Patient experience only nighttime hot flashes or worked night shifts on a regular basis. 4. Patient was concurrently treated with gabapentin for other indications. If patient was using gabapentin for treatment of hot flashes, she could be screened after a 7-day washout period provided hot flashes returned. 5. Patient had previously experienced dose-limiting adverse events that prevented titration of gabapentin to an effective dose. 6. Patient had a hypersensitivity to gabapentin. 7. Patient was in an immunocompromised state. 8. Patient had a malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma within 2 years prior to study entry. 9. Patient had gastric reduction surgery, severe chronic diarrhea, chronic constipation, uncontrolled irritable bowel syndrome, uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, or unexplained weight loss. 10. Patient had clinically significant abnormal chemistry or hematology results, or calculated glomerular filtration rate \<60 mL/min. 11. Patient had history of substance abuse within year prior to study entry. 12. Patient was concurrently taking morphine. 13. Patient had history of chronic hepatitis B or C, hepatitis within 3 months prior to study entry, or history of human immunodeficiency virus. Other Exclusions apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to PlaceboFrom baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline in average daily frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes after 4 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to PlaceboForm baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline in average daily frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes after 12 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to PlaceboFrom baseline to 4 weeksChange from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate to severe hot flashes after 4 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Severity score is on a 3-point scale where 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to PlaceboFrom baseline to 12 weeksChange from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate to severe hot flashes after 12 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Severity score is on a 3-point scale were 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

541 participants were randomized (enrolled), but only 532 participants received treatment and are included as STARTED.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
G-ER 1200 mg
Gabapentin extended-release (G-ER) 1200 mg
174
G-ER 1800 mg
Gabapentin extended-release (G-ER) 1800 mg
181
Sugar Pill
Placebo 1200 mg or 1800 mg
177
Total532

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event28207
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy849
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up301
Overall StudyNot specified or missing data91812
Overall StudyProtocol Violation211
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject121212

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicG-ER 1200 mgG-ER 1800 mgSugar PillTotal
Age Continuous52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
53.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Age, Customized
<65 years
170 Participants176 Participants170 Participants516 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
4 Participants5 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Number of hot flashes in 24-hour period
Moderate hot flashes
6.1 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
6.2 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
6.3 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
6.2 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
Number of hot flashes in 24-hour period
Severe hot flashes
6.4 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
7.4 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
7.1 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
7.0 Hot flashes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
39 Participants37 Participants50 Participants126 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
12 Participants13 Participants12 Participants37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
121 Participants125 Participants111 Participants357 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
174 Participants181 Participants177 Participants532 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
148 / 174167 / 18165 / 177
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1746 / 1814 / 177

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo

Change from baseline in average daily frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes after 12 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

Time frame: Form baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
G-ER 1200 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-7.4 Moderate or severe hot flashes
G-ER 1800 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-7.4 Moderate or severe hot flashes
Sugar PillChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-6.9 Moderate or severe hot flashes
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily number of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 12p-value: 0.18397.5% CI: [-1.49, 0.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily number of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 12.p-value: 0.197597.5% CI: [-1.46, 0.4]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo

Change from baseline in average daily frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes after 4 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

Time frame: From baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
G-ER 1200 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-6.8 Moderate or severe hot flashes
G-ER 1800 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-7.3 Moderate or severe hot flashes
Sugar PillChange From Baseline in Average Daily Frequency of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-5.8 Moderate or severe hot flashes
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily number of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 4p-value: 0.011797.5% CI: [-1.81, -0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily number of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 4.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-2.35, -0.66]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo

Change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate to severe hot flashes after 12 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Severity score is on a 3-point scale were 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe.

Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
G-ER 1200 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.7 Score on a numerical scale
G-ER 1800 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.7 Score on a numerical scale
Sugar PillChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.5 Score on a numerical scale
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 12.p-value: 0.043397.5% CI: [-0.43, 0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 12.p-value: 0.046897.5% CI: [-0.42, 0.03]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo

Change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate to severe hot flashes after 4 weeks of treatment with stable daily doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg compared with placebo, using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method of imputation for missing data in intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Severity score is on a 3-point scale where 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe.

Time frame: From baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
G-ER 1200 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.5 Score on a numerical scale
G-ER 1800 mgChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.6 Score on a numerical scale
Sugar PillChange From Baseline in Average Daily Severity Score of Hot Flashes After 4 Weeks of Treatment With Daily Doses of G-ER 1200 mg or G-ER 1800 mg Compared to Placebo-0.3 Score on a numerical scale
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 4.p-value: 0.001697.5% CI: [-0.44, -0.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there were no treatment differences relative to placebo in mean change from baseline in average daily severity score of moderate or severe hot flashes at stable dosing Week 4.p-value: <0.000197.5% CI: [-0.51, -0.14]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026