Skip to content

Typical Flutter Ablation:A Comparison of 4 mm Versus 2 mm Irrigated cathéters

Typical Flutter Ablation:A Comparison of 4 mm Versus 2 mm Irrigated cathéters

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00750711
Enrollment
200
Registered
2008-09-10
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2008-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irrigated Catheters, Radiofrequency Ablation, Typical Atrial Flutter

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 4 mm irrigated catheters with 2 mm irrigated catheters for ablation of typical flutter.It's a prospective randomised multicenter study.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadiofrequency ablation for atrial flutter by catheters

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients above the age 18 years undergoing a first catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Hemodynamic instability * A recurrence of previous ablated typical atrial flutter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedural success rate, procedure duration, number of RF applications, delivered power, impedance, complication rate, recurrence at six months6 months

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactDipen DS Shah, professor
dipen.shah@hcuge.ch0041223727197
Backup ContactHenri HS Sunthorn, doctor
henri.sunthorn@hcuge.ch0041223727194

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026