Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Lithium Carbonate in the Treatment of Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries

Efficacy and Safety pf Lithium Carbonate in the Treatment of Chronic Spinal Cord Injuries: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00750061
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-09-10
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2015-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury

Brief summary

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Forty patients will be randomized into two groups. The subjects in the Treatment Group will be administered with lithium carbonate, while the Control Group will receive placebo. Each subject will receive oral lithium carbonate or placebo for six weeks. In the treatment group, the dose will be adjusted according to the serum lithium level while in the control group there will be a sham adjustment. The outcomes will be assessed 6 weeks and 6 months after the onset of the medication. The outcomes will be compared with baseline pre-treatment data to obtain neurological change scores. The efficacy and safety will be analyzed comparing the results of the treatment group with those of the control group.

Interventions

DRUGLithium Carbonate

The subject start at a dosage regime of three times a day and one tablet of lithium carbonate, 250mg/table, oral administration each time for three days. The daily dose will be adjusted according to the serum lithium level and the clinical findings. Target serum lithium level is 0.6-1.2mM. The course of medication is 6 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo

Sponsors

China Rehabilitation Research Center
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
China Spinal Cord Injury Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects of either gender and 18-60 years of age; * Subjects with chromic spinal cord injury (defined as a history of spinal cord injury for 12 months or longer); * Subjects with ASIA - classification of A, B, or C for at least 6 months unchanged; * Spinal cord injury vertebral level should be between C4 and T10; * Subjects must be able to read, understand, and complete the VAS; * Subjects who have voluntarily signed and dated an informed consent form, approved by an IRB/IEC, prior to any study specific procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* A history of hypersensitivity or other adverse reaction to lithium; * Significant renal, cardiovascular, hepatic and psychiatric disease; * Significant medical diseases or infection; * Addison's disease; * Debilitation or dehydration; * Recently taken or are taking diuretics or other drugs with known interaction with lithium, such as tricyclic antidepressants, NSAIDs and tetracyclines; * A history of alcohol abuse or drug abuse; * Pregnant or lactating women; * Female of childbearing potential and are unwilling to use an effective contraceptive method while enrolled in the study; * Subjects who are currently participating in another investigational study or has been taking any investigational drug within the last 4 weeks prior to screening of this study; * Subjects who have taken lithium for manic depression or other psychiatric conditions,and finally; * Any criteria, which, in the opinion of the investigator, suggests that the subject would not be compliant with the study protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of Neurological Scores for Baseline6 monthsChanges of Motor Scores (0 \ 100), Pin Prick Scores (0 \ 112) and Light Touch Scores (0 \ 112) from Baseline to Week 6 and Month 6. The higher the changes the better the functional improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain6 monthsChanges from Baseline to Week 6 and Month 6 in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor subscale (0 \ 91, the higher the better), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (0 \ 100, the less the better)

Countries

China, Taiwan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo Placebo: Matching placebo
20
Lithium Carbonate
Lithium Carbonate Lithium Carbonate: The subject start at a dosage regime of three times a day and one tablet of lithium carbonate, 250mg/table, oral administration each time for three days. The daily dose will be adjusted according to the serum lithium level and the clinical findings. Target serum lithium level is 0.6-1.2mM. The course of medication is 6 weeks.
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboLithium CarbonateTotal
Age, Continuous38.05 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.092
41.4 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.785
39.624 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.617
Age, Customized
18-30 years-old
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Age, Customized
31-40 years-old
9 participants8 participants17 participants
Age, Customized
41-50 years-old
4 participants10 participants14 participants
Age, Customized
51-60 years-old
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants19 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 2016 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Changes of Neurological Scores for Baseline

Changes of Motor Scores (0 \ 100), Pin Prick Scores (0 \ 112) and Light Touch Scores (0 \ 112) from Baseline to Week 6 and Month 6. The higher the changes the better the functional improvement.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange light touch score (wk6-d0)-0.158 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.688
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange light touch score (m6-d0)2.208 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.141
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange pin-prick score (wk6-d0)0.053 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.229
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange pin-prick score (m6-d0)1.906 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.775
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange motor score (wk6-d0)-1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.607
PlaceboChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange motor score (m6-d0)0.844 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.471
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange motor score (wk6-d0)0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange light touch score (wk6-d0)0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange pin-prick score (m6-d0)-0.982 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.498
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange light touch score (m6-d0)-0.766 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.014
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange motor score (m6-d0)1.316 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.657
Lithium CarbonateChanges of Neurological Scores for Baselinechange pin-prick score (wk6-d0)0.053 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.229
Comparison: change light touch score (wk6-d0)p-value: 0.343Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: change light touch score (m6-d0)p-value: 0.69Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: change pin-prick score (wk6-d0)p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: change pin-prick score (m6-d0)p-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: change motor score (wk6-d0)p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: change motor score (m6-d0)p-value: 0.582Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Changes in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

Changes from Baseline to Week 6 and Month 6 in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor subscale (0 \ 91, the higher the better), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain (0 \ 100, the less the better)

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in FIM (Wk6 - D0)0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in FIM (M6 - D0)3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
PlaceboChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in VAS (Wk6 - D0)1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
PlaceboChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in VAS (M6 - D0)-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Lithium CarbonateChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in VAS (M6 - D0)-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Lithium CarbonateChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in FIM (Wk6 - D0)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Lithium CarbonateChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in VAS (Wk6 - D0)-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Lithium CarbonateChanges in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor Subscale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Painchange in FIM (M6 - D0)0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Comparison: FIM change (Wk6 - D0)p-value: 0.257Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: FIM change (M6 - D0)p-value: 0.168Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: VAS change (Wk6 - D0)p-value: 0.013Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: VAS change (M6 - D0)p-value: 0.137Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026