Skip to content

The Vertos MILD™ Preliminary Patient Evaluation Study

A Single-center, Prospective, Clinical Study to Assess the Clinical Application and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression With the MILD™ Devices in Patients With Symptomatic Central Foraminal Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00749073
Enrollment
10
Registered
2008-09-09
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2013-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Keywords

Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Laminotomy, Laminectomy, Spine Surgery

Brief summary

This is a single-center, open label, prospective clinical study to assess the clinical application and functional outcomes of symptomatic patients undergoing the Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD™) treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. In this study, patient-reported outcomes over a 3 month period following treatment will be collected by the investigator. Periodic surveys for each study subject's pain, functional status, quality of life and physical examination will track outcomes following MILD™ treatment.

Detailed description

The Vertos MILD™ devices are used for image-guided Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression, referred to as the MILD™ procedure. This percutaneous procedure is performed under fluoroscopic image guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine. Lumbar decompression is performed through the removal of tissue and bone, where indicated. All procedures are conducted in accordance with the product labeling and indications for use. A minimum of ten up to a maximum of twenty-five adult patients will be enrolled and followed for a period of up to 6 months. Patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis who meet the study enrollment criteria will be offered the MILD™ procedure as an alternative to surgery or continued standard non-surgical medical management.

Interventions

DEVICEMinimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD™)

The arthroscopic devices in this study are specialized surgical instruments intended to be used to perform percutaneous lumbar decompressive procedures for the treatment of various spinal conditions.

Sponsors

Vertos Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) primarily caused by dorsal element hypertrophy. 2. Prior failure of conservative therapy. 3. Radiologic evidence of LSS (L3-L5), Ligamentum flavum \> 2.5 mm, confirmed by pre op MRI and/or CT. 4. Central canal cross sectional area \< 100mm2. 5. Anterior listhesis \< 2 - 3mm. 6. Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain. 7. Available to complete 12 weeks of follow-up. 8. A signed Informed Consent Form is obtained from the patient. 9. Adults ≥ 18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior surgery at intended treatment level. 2. History of recent spinal fractures with concurrent pain symptoms. 3. Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than LSS (e.g. acute compression fracture, metabolic neuropathy, or vascular claudication symptoms, etc.). 4. Significant disk protrusion or osteophyte formation. 5. Excessive facet hypertrophy. 6. Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti coagulants. 7. Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 5 days of treatment. 8. Epidural steroids within prior three weeks. 9. Inability of the patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, etc.). 10. Any potential wound healing pathologies that may compromise outcomes, including: diabetes, excessive smoking history, cancer, connective tissue diseases, recent spine radiation and severe COPD. 11. Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent. 12. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Back Pain as Measured by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).Baseline and Six MonthsClinical relevance established by change of two points or more on a ten point scale where zero represents no pain and ten represents worst pain imaginable. Mean change from baseline to Month 6 was reported with a positive number representing the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
Function as Measured Subjectively by the Oswestry Disability Index Patient QuestionnaireBaseline and Month 6Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is used to measure permanent functional disability through a series of questions which characterize the disturbance of activities of daily living resulting from chronic back pain. The questionnaire is divided into 10 topics including pain intensity , personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling and employment/homemaking. Each topic is rated 0 (no pain or no limitation) to 5 (high pain or very limited physically). The worst possible score is 50 (100% disability) and best would be zero (0% disability), thus a higher ODI score indicates greater disability.
Quality of Life as Measured by the PCS Subscale of the Short-form 12 Question (SF-12) Survey.Baseline and Six monthsThe 12-question SF-12v2 Health Survey is a validated generic measure of health status & outcomes, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. The Physical Component Summary (PCS)takes into account the correlations among the Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), and Vitality (VT)SF-12v2 Health Survey scales to show the broad impact on PCS. Norm-based scoring is used so each scale has the same mean (50 points) and the same standard deviation (10 points) as the general US population in 1998. Scores below 50 indicate a decline in health status, with lower scores representing worse health status. Minimally Important Difference (MID) is a measure of true clinical relevance of a difference, with suggested MID for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) being 2 to 3 points. Change from baseline to 6 months is presented, where a positive value represents the 6 month value minus the baseline value.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study enrolled between September 2008 and January 2009. Recruitment derived from patient pool of complex cases, all with confirmed presence of hypertrophic ligament, wait-listed for decompression laminectomy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mild Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression
The single group in this pilot study included ten patients treated for lumbar spinal stenosis of the central canal using the mild device kit to perform minimally invasive percutaneous decompression.
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMild Percutaneous Lumbar Decompression
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants
Age Continuous62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.84
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Back Pain as Measured by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Clinical relevance established by change of two points or more on a ten point scale where zero represents no pain and ten represents worst pain imaginable. Mean change from baseline to Month 6 was reported with a positive number representing the baseline value minus the 6 month value.

Time frame: Baseline and Six Months

Population: All available treated patients at six months post treatment. Mean change from baseline to Month 6 was reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Percutaneous Lumbar DecompressionChanges in Back Pain as Measured by a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS).3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Primary

Function as Measured Subjectively by the Oswestry Disability Index Patient Questionnaire

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is used to measure permanent functional disability through a series of questions which characterize the disturbance of activities of daily living resulting from chronic back pain. The questionnaire is divided into 10 topics including pain intensity , personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling and employment/homemaking. Each topic is rated 0 (no pain or no limitation) to 5 (high pain or very limited physically). The worst possible score is 50 (100% disability) and best would be zero (0% disability), thus a higher ODI score indicates greater disability.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 6

Population: All treated patients having six month follow-up were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Percutaneous Lumbar DecompressionFunction as Measured Subjectively by the Oswestry Disability Index Patient Questionnaire19.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.73
Primary

Quality of Life as Measured by the PCS Subscale of the Short-form 12 Question (SF-12) Survey.

The 12-question SF-12v2 Health Survey is a validated generic measure of health status & outcomes, as opposed to one that targets a specific age, disease, or treatment group. The Physical Component Summary (PCS)takes into account the correlations among the Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), Bodily Pain (BP), General Health (GH), and Vitality (VT)SF-12v2 Health Survey scales to show the broad impact on PCS. Norm-based scoring is used so each scale has the same mean (50 points) and the same standard deviation (10 points) as the general US population in 1998. Scores below 50 indicate a decline in health status, with lower scores representing worse health status. Minimally Important Difference (MID) is a measure of true clinical relevance of a difference, with suggested MID for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) being 2 to 3 points. Change from baseline to 6 months is presented, where a positive value represents the 6 month value minus the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Six months

Population: All available treated patients with six month follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mild Percutaneous Lumbar DecompressionQuality of Life as Measured by the PCS Subscale of the Short-form 12 Question (SF-12) Survey.6.14 units on a scale95% Confidence Interval 9.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026