Skip to content

Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil vs Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Chlorambucil Versus Chlorambucil Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00748189
Acronym
COMPLEMENT 1
Enrollment
447
Registered
2008-09-08
Start date
2008-12-22
Completion date
2018-05-17
Last updated
2019-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic

Keywords

Safety, Untreated, Efficacy, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), untreated, Ofatumumab, Oncology

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to chlorambucil in patients with untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Detailed description

Chlorambucil, is currently approved for treatment of frontline chronic lymphocytic leukemia, especially, but not limited to the ailing and elderly patient population. Several other more aggressive treatment options are available (e.g. fludarabine), however they are not suitable for all CLL patients, especially the ailing and elderly, due to greater toxicity. Ofatumumab is effective with low toxicity. The addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil offers potentially a more effective therapy, with limited toxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall response and overall survival in subjects with previously untreated CLL with ofatumumab added to chlorambucil versus chlorambucil.

Interventions

2mg tablets, chlorambucil dose: 10mg/m2 PO at days 1-7 every 28 days; duration: minimum of 3 cycles until best response or maximum of 12 cycles

iv infusion; dose: cycle 1 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1 every 28 days;

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* confirmed CLL diagnosis and active CLL requiring treatment * considered inappropriate for fludarabine-based therapy * not been treated for CLL before * fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours * age 18yrs or older * signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* prior CLL therapy * abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver, and kidney function * certain heart problems, active or chronic infections, serious significant diseases, active autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) requiring treatment, other current cancer or within last 5 years * CLL transformation * CLL central nervous system involvement * current participation in other clinical study * inability to comply with the protocol activities * lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occured first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to about 49 monthsPFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event or death occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time or if new anti-cancer therapy was started were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)From randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)MRD was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization up to about 111 monthsOverall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the total IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization uo to about 27 monthsTime to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders (CR, CRi, PR, nPR) were included in the analysis.
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization up to about 43 monthsDOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time (\>= 12 weeks) were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment. Par. with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders.
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization up to about 49 monthsTime to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to disease progression (PD). PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.
Time to Next TherapyFrom randomization up to about 49 monthsTime to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment.
Number of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, 1 month Follow-upThe ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead. Participants with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are shown..
Number of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 month Follow-upAssessment for the presence of the following symptoms were performed at Screening, Day 1 of each treatment cycle and at every Follow-up visit: night sweats (without signs of infection); unexplained, unintentional weight loss \>= 10% within the previous 6 months; recurrent, unexplained fever of greater than 38 degrees celsius or 100.5 degrees fahrenheit for 2 weeks; and extreme fatigue. The best response refers to overall best response in terms of CR, CRi, PR or nPR. Data are presented for constitutional response= yes and no.
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive ResultBaseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, 1 Month Follow-up, and 6 Month Follow-upSerum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), Cycle 4 Day 1 (after 3 months of treatment), and at 1 month and 6 months post last dose of ofatumumab. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive and further evaluated in the titration test to obtain a titer of HAHA.
Cmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCycle 1 Day 1,Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, and Cycle 9 Day 1Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and observed drug concentration prior to the next dose (Ctrough) were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of treatment.
Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of OfatumumabCycle 4 Day 1Plasma clearance is defined as the plasma volume which is totally cleared of drug per unit of time. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Number of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred, up to about 49 monthsOR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) is defined as the distribution of a drug between plasma and the rest of the body at steady state. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at predose and 0.5 hour after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Plasma Half Life (t1/2) of OfatumumabCycle 4 Day 1The terminal half-life (t1/2) of ofatumumab is defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to reach half of its original concentration. Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma half-life of ofatumumab. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.
Dose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Cycle 3 Day 1Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of chlorambucil and PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) \[No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00\].
Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Cycle 3 Day 1Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUC\[0-inf\]) and over 6 hours (AUC\[0-6\]) of chlorambucil and AUC(0-6) of PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) \[No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00\].
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)Baseline, Cycle 4 day 1, cycle 7 day 1, 1 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-upHRQOL was assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTCQLQC30), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16), EuorQoL-Five Dimension (EQ-5D), and HCQ. Period (P)1 (Day 85, Day 169, Day 253) and P2 (scheduled follow-up (FU) and withdrawal visits) analysis were considered. Baseline (BL) for P1 was defined as score from screening visit and BL for P2 was defined as the last on-treatment score. The 2 principal QoL outcomes were pre-specified as the Global Health scale (GHS/QOL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and fatigue scale of the EORTC QLQ-CLL16. For EORTC QLQ-C30,GHS/Qol, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 100 being 'best') and a positive difference from BL is indicative of better functioning (range -100 to +100). For the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 fatigue scale, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 0 being 'best') and a negative difference from BL represents an improvement in fatigue (range -100 to +100).
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherFrom the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.Participants with a Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented by treatment cycle. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) DiseaseFrom the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.AIHA is a disease where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants diagnosed with AIHA are presented.
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyFrom start of treatment to the last study visit/withdrawal visit (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products are counted in this table.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMFrom start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatmentImmunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants. Baseline IgA, IgG, and IgM values are the last pre-dose assessment values performed on Cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
AUC(0-tau) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1Area under the concentration time curve over the dosing interval \[AUC(0-tau)\] is a measure of drug exposure over time. AUC(0-tau) is defined as the area under the ofatumumab plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to time tau, where tau is the length of the dosing interval of ofatumumab. For estimation of AUC(0-tau), blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hous after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, India, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants (par.) were stratified by age (\<65 years vs. \>=65years), stage (Binet A vs. B vs. C) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0-1 vs. 2). Participants in each stratum were then centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ofatumumab plus chlorambucil (O+CHL) or chlorambucil alone (CHL).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Chlorambucil
Participants with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) received chlorambucil monotherapy 10 milligram (mg)/meter squared (m\^2) orally on Days 1-7 of every 28-day cycle for a minimum of 3 cycles until best response or a maximum of 12 cycles.
226
Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil
Participants with CLL received intravenous (IV) infusions of ofatumumab on Day 1 (300 mg) and Day 8 (1000 mg) in the first cycle, followed by IV infusions of 1000 mg on the first day of each subsequent 28-day cycle in combination with chlorambucil 10 mg/m\^2 orally on Days 1-7 of every 28-day cycle for a minimum of 3 cycles until best response or a maximum of 12 cycles.
221
Total447

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath9984
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up815
Overall StudyPhysician Decision165
Overall StudyStudy terminated by Sponsor7079
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2329

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOfatumumab + ChlorambucilTotalChlorambucil
Age, Customized
Years
69 Years69 Years70 Years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
19 Participants41 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Mixed Race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
196 Participants397 Participants201 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants165 Participants86 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
142 Participants282 Participants140 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
99 / 22784 / 217183 / 444
other
Total, other adverse events
175 / 227183 / 217358 / 444
serious
Total, serious adverse events
57 / 22753 / 217110 / 444

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event or death occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time or if new anti-cancer therapy was started were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.

Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occured first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to about 49 months

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all par. randomized to study treatment regardless of whether or not they received treatment. PFS was assessed by a blinded independent review committee according to the International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) updated National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilProgression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)13.1 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilProgression-Free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)22.4 Months
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.45, 0.72]Log Rank
Secondary

AUC(0-tau) of Ofatumumab

Area under the concentration time curve over the dosing interval \[AUC(0-tau)\] is a measure of drug exposure over time. AUC(0-tau) is defined as the area under the ofatumumab plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to time tau, where tau is the length of the dosing interval of ofatumumab. For estimation of AUC(0-tau), blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hous after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: PK Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were assessed. The number of participants assessed at each time point is indicated by n=X,X.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilAUC(0-tau) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Day 1, n=0, 1932621 µg x hours/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.76
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilAUC(0-tau) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Day 8, n=0, 20825369 µg x hours/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.87
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilAUC(0-tau) of OfatumumabCycle 4 Day 1, n=0, 18365100 µg x hours/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.73
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

HRQOL was assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTCQLQC30), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16), EuorQoL-Five Dimension (EQ-5D), and HCQ. Period (P)1 (Day 85, Day 169, Day 253) and P2 (scheduled follow-up (FU) and withdrawal visits) analysis were considered. Baseline (BL) for P1 was defined as score from screening visit and BL for P2 was defined as the last on-treatment score. The 2 principal QoL outcomes were pre-specified as the Global Health scale (GHS/QOL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and fatigue scale of the EORTC QLQ-CLL16. For EORTC QLQ-C30,GHS/Qol, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 100 being 'best') and a positive difference from BL is indicative of better functioning (range -100 to +100). For the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 fatigue scale, the possible scale range was 0-100 (with 0 being 'best') and a negative difference from BL represents an improvement in fatigue (range -100 to +100).

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 4 day 1, cycle 7 day 1, 1 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up, 12 month follow-up

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 4 Day 1, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=139,1591.92 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.22
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 7 Day 1, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=52, 558.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1,Cycle 4 Day 1,QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=145,163-4.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.48
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 7 Day 1,QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=55,57-1.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.43
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2,1 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=118, 1504.79 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.13
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 6 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=83, 1293.01 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.07
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 12 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=48, 963.82 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.27
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 1 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=121, 152-1.24 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.75
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 6 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=85, 131-7.06 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.96
ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 12 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=51, 95-2.94 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.86
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 1 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=121, 152-0.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.13
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 4 Day 1, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=139,1596.08 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.08
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 6 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=83, 1293.75 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.83
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 7 Day 1, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=52, 556.97 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.55
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 12 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=51, 950.88 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.91
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1,Cycle 4 Day 1,QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=145,163-4.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.23
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 12 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=48, 961.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.69
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P1, Cycle 7 Day 1,QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=55,57-9.36 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.93
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2, 6 month FU, QLQCLL16 fatigue score, n=85, 131-2.93 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.34
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)P2,1 month FU, QLQC30 GHS/QoL score, n=118, 1500.56 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.31
Secondary

Cmax and Ctrough of Ofatumumab

Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab. Maximum concentration (Cmax) and observed drug concentration prior to the next dose (Ctrough) were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of treatment.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1,Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, and Cycle 9 Day 1

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population: all participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained and analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCmax, Cycle 1 Day 1, n=0, 17651.8 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.03
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCmax, Cycle 1 Day 8, n=0, 193241 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.46
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCmax, Cycle 4 Day 1, n=0, 169285 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.44
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 1 Day 8, n=0, 992.5 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.85
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 2 Day 1, n=0, 1385.2 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.37
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 3 Day 1, n=0, 1426.2 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.06
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 4 Day 1, n=0, 14715.5 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 7.99
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 5 Day 1, n=0, 14933.5 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.61
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 6 Day 1, n=0, 15545.9 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 2.77
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilCmax and Ctrough of OfatumumabCtrough, Cycle 9 Day 1, n=0, 5655.6 Micrograms/Milliliter (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 3.5
Secondary

Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)

Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUC\[0-inf\]) and over 6 hours (AUC\[0-6\]) of chlorambucil and AUC(0-6) of PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) \[No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00\].

Time frame: Cycle 3 Day 1

Population: Chlorambucil/PAAM pharmacokinetic (PK) Population (substudy): all participants for whom a chlorambucil/PAAM sample is obtained and analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil AUC(0-6)/Dose67.84 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.24
ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil AUC(0-inf)/Dose74.42 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.23
ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)PAAM AUC(0-6)/Dose71.52 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.26
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil AUC(0-6)/Dose65.43 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.44
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil AUC(0-inf)/Dose67.10 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.45
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDose-normalized AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-inf) of Chlorambucil and Dose-normalized AUC(0-6) of Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)PAAM AUC(0-6)/Dose80.32 Hours*nanogram/milliliter/milligramStandard Deviation 0.26
90% CI: [0.77, 1.4]
90% CI: [0.82, 1.5]
90% CI: [0.72, 1.1]
Secondary

Dose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)

Blood samples for the determination of serum concentrations of chlorambucil and its metabolite PAAM were collected from participants in a substudy on Cycle 3 Day 1. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of chlorambucil and PAAM normalized to the administered dose was determined as a measure of exposure and compared to reference data from a prior study (LEUA1001) \[No NCT number available for this study; GlaxoSmithKline Document Number RM1998/00449/00\].

Time frame: Cycle 3 Day 1

Population: Chlorambucil/PAAM pharmacokinetic (PK) Population (substudy): all participants for whom a chlorambucil/PAAM sample is obtained and analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ChlorambucilDose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil Cmax/Dose27.1 nanograms per milliliter per milligramStandard Deviation 0.32
ChlorambucilDose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)PAAM Cmax/Dose19.3 nanograms per milliliter per milligramStandard Deviation 0.23
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)Chlorambucil Cmax/Dose38.4 nanograms per milliliter per milligramStandard Deviation 0.36
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDose-normalized Cmax of Chlorambucil and Phenylacetic Acid Mustard (PAAM)PAAM Cmax/Dose24.3 nanograms per milliliter per milligramStandard Deviation 0.3
90% CI: [0.53, 0.94]
90% CI: [0.63, 0.99]
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC

DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Par. who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time (\>= 12 weeks) were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment. Par. with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders.

Time frame: From randomization up to about 43 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. Only responders (CR, CRi, PR, nPR) were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilDuration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC13.2 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilDuration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC22.1 Months
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM

Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured in the blood samples of the participants. Baseline IgA, IgG, and IgM values are the last pre-dose assessment values performed on Cycle 1 Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: From start of treatment up to 30 days after last treatment

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the Safety Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgA, n=175, 1860.047 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.5706
ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgG, n=175, 186-0.458 Gram per literStandard Deviation 3.6177
ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgM n=175, 186-0.398 Gram per literStandard Deviation 4.7864
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgA, n=175, 1860.048 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.4257
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgG, n=175, 186-0.268 Gram per literStandard Deviation 2.543
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilMean Change From Baseline in the Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMIgM n=175, 186-0.031 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.2507
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study

Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products are counted in this table.

Time frame: From start of treatment to the last study visit/withdrawal visit (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyNo transfusions159 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyAt least one transfusion68 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyNo transfusions168 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyAt least one transfusion49 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

MRD was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.

Time frame: From randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred (Median follow-up approximately 28.9 months)

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative, irrespective of response8 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative, with an IRC-assessed CR0 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative, irrespective of response26 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)MRD negative, with an IRC-assessed CR10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 431 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 336 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 413 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 354 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 525 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 525 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 536 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 367 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 436 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny AE, Grade 536 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 419 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAny SAE, Grade 334 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result

Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), Cycle 4 Day 1 (after 3 months of treatment), and at 1 month and 6 months post last dose of ofatumumab. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive and further evaluated in the titration test to obtain a titer of HAHA.

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1, 1 Month Follow-up, and 6 Month Follow-up

Population: Safety population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of a study drug. Only participants with post-ofatumumab HAHA Results are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE205 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE84 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any AE208 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Any SAE97 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)

Participants with a Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented by treatment cycle. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)92 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression (Anemia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)83 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease

AIHA is a disease where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants diagnosed with AIHA are presented.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication and until follow-up for SAEs unless initiation of subsequent anti-CLL therapy, up to approximately 111 months.

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease6 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) Disease4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)

Assessment for the presence of the following symptoms were performed at Screening, Day 1 of each treatment cycle and at every Follow-up visit: night sweats (without signs of infection); unexplained, unintentional weight loss \>= 10% within the previous 6 months; recurrent, unexplained fever of greater than 38 degrees celsius or 100.5 degrees fahrenheit for 2 weeks; and extreme fatigue. The best response refers to overall best response in terms of CR, CRi, PR or nPR. Data are presented for constitutional response= yes and no.

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 month Follow-up

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, Baseline, n=226, 221120 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, Cycle 3 Day 1, n=198, 19944 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, 1 Month Follow-up, n=198, 20023 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, Baseline, n=226, 221118 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, Cycle 3 Day 1, n=198, 19933 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in Constitutional Symptoms (CS)CS present, 1 Month Follow-up, n=198, 20022 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1

The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead. Participants with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are shown..

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 3 Day 1, 1 month Follow-up

Population: ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) at Baseline209 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) at Cycle 3 Day 1184 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) 1 Month Follow-up183 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) at Baseline200 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) at Cycle 3 Day 1189 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With Improvement in ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1ECOG (0, 1) 1 Month Follow-up191 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC

OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.

Time frame: From randomization until the 259th PFS event occurred, up to about 49 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed. OR was according to the International Workshop for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) updated National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines. The 95% exact binomial confidence interval is for CR+CRi+nPR+PR.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCR3 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCRi0 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCnPR0 Participants
ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCPR152 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCPR149 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCR27 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCnPR1 Participants
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilNumber of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCRi5 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the total IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From randomization up to about 111 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilOverall Survival84.67 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilOverall SurvivalNA Months
p-value: 0.36395% CI: [0.65, 1.17]Log Rank
Secondary

Plasma Half Life (t1/2) of Ofatumumab

The terminal half-life (t1/2) of ofatumumab is defined as the time required for the plasma concentration of ofatumumab to reach half of its original concentration. Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma half-life of ofatumumab. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilPlasma Half Life (t1/2) of Ofatumumab445 hoursGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1.05
Secondary

Time to Next Therapy

Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment.

Time frame: From randomization up to about 49 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilTime to Next Therapy24.67 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilTime to Next Therapy39.82 Months
Secondary

Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC

Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to disease progression (PD). PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis or if a progression event occurred after extensive lost-to-follow-up time were censored at the date of the last visit with adequate assessment.

Time frame: From randomization up to about 49 months

Population: ITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilTime to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC13.6 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilTime to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC23.1 Months
Secondary

Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC

Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders (CR, CRi, PR, nPR) were included in the analysis.

Time frame: From randomization uo to about 27 months

Population: ITT population. Time to response was measured using the International Workshop for CLL (IWCLL) updated National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines 2008.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ChlorambucilTime to Response, as Assessed by the IRC1.9 Months
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilTime to Response, as Assessed by the IRC1.2 Months
Secondary

Total Plasma Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab

Plasma clearance is defined as the plasma volume which is totally cleared of drug per unit of time. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at pre-dose and 0.5 hours after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to the ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on duration of treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Time frame: Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: PK Population.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilTotal Plasma Clearance (CL) of Ofatumumab15.4 Milliliter/hour (mL/h)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.73
Secondary

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Ofatumumab

Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) is defined as the distribution of a drug between plasma and the rest of the body at steady state. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus chlorambucil at predose and 0.5 hour after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, pre-dose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 12 (Days 29, 57, 113, 141, 225 and 309), depending on the duration of the treatment. Samples were also collected during clinic visits on Day 15 (during Cycle 1) and Day 43 (during Cycle 2) and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8, and Cycle 4 Day 1

Population: PK Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were assessed. The number of participants assessed at each time point is indicated by n=X,X.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of OfatumumabVss, Cycle 1 Day 1, n=0, 1937.78 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.55
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of OfatumumabVss, Cycle 1 Day 8, n=0, 2087.77 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.54
Ofatumumab + ChlorambucilVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of OfatumumabVss, Cycle 4 Day 1, n=0, 1838.06 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 0.53

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026