Skip to content

Study to Explore the Effect of Mefloquine in Participants With Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)

A Randomized, Rater-Blinded Study to Explore the Effect of Mefloquine in Subjects With Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00746941
Enrollment
37
Registered
2008-09-04
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2014-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy

Keywords

PML, Human Polyomavirus JC, HIV, Central Nervous System Disease, Mefloquine, JC Virus

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study was to explore whether mefloquine can delay or stop progression of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) as measured by JC virus (human polyomavirus or JCV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The secondary objective of the study was to explore whether mefloquine can delay or stop progression of PML based on neurological deterioration, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of brain lesion evolution or the formation of new lesions, and mortality.

Interventions

DRUGmefloquine

250 mg orally each day for 3 days and then weekly up to 6 months.

Sponsors

Elan Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of PML confirmed by detection of JCV DNA in CSF. * Onset of PML symptoms within 6 months prior to study. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Other opportunistic infection of the central nervous system. * Current severe illness or any other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for enrollment. * Active severe mental illness (e.g., depression, anxiety, psychosis, and schizophrenia). * Hypersensitivity to mefloquine, quinine, or quinidine, or to any component of these drugs. * Current treatment with quinine, quinidine, chloroquine, or halofantrine. Note: Other protocol-defined criteria may also apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Day 0 (baseline), Week 4Change from baseline to Week 4 in JC viral load in CSF is expressed as log10 copies/mL. Negative values indicate a reduction in viral load. Only participants with measurable baseline values are included. Post-baseline values of 'Below the Limit of Quantification' or 'Below Limit of Detection' or 'Negative' were set to 50. Log10 (50) = 1.699
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)Day 0 (baseline), Week 8Change from baseline to Week 8 in JC viral load in CSF is expressed as log10 copies/mL. Negative values indicate a reduction in viral load. Only participants with measurable baseline values are included. Post-baseline values of 'Below the Limit of Quantification' or 'Below Limit of Detection' or 'Negative' were set to 50. Log10 (50) = 1.699

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8The SDMT is a simple substitution task. The test gives participants 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as a measure for screening cognitive impairment. The total score is the total number of correctly completed boxes in the time allowed. The test score range is from 0 (worst outcome) to 110 (best outcome). Negative change from baseline scores indicates a worsening outcome.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8Participants rate their neurological function on a scale of 100 mm line, where the 0 end of the scale indicates poor neurological function and 100 indicates excellent neurological function. VAS was not required for participants who had physical or cognitive impairments that limited their ability to perform the assessment. Negative change from baseline scores indicates a worsening outcome.
Participants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsDay 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreDay 0 (baseline), Week 4 and 8EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death) was calculated. Negative change scores indicate improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsDay 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8
Participants Who Died Within 6 MonthsDay 1 up to 6 monthsThe death event is counted under the treatment arm relative to adding mefloquine to the treatment regimen.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsDay 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index ScoreDay 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8The KPS Index classifies participants' functional impairment. KPS can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the KPS score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. The KPS index is subdivided into 3 categories: incapacitated (0 to 40), self-care (50 to 70), and normal activity (80 to 100). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improved prognosis.

Countries

Brazil, Germany, Italy, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Twelve sites enrolled participants prior to study termination.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were initially randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the local standard of care arm (represented below as 3 treatment arms depending on Week 4 and Week 8 decisions) or the local standard of care plus mefloquine 250 mg arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Local Standard of Care
Participants were randomized to receive local standard of care, which may have included any treatment or procedure that the Investigator would normally use in the treatment of a PML patient at their study site or hospital. These participants received only local standard of care throughout the study; they did not choose to add 250 mg mefloquine at Week 4 (Day 28) or Week 8 (Day 56).
7
Local Standard of Care; Mefloquine at Week 4
Participants were randomized to receive local standard of care, which may have included any treatment or procedure that the Investigator would normally use in the treatment of a PML patient at their study site or hospital. These participants chose to add 250 mg mefloquine by mouth at Week 4 for 3 days and then weekly through Week 24 to their local standard of care treatment.
5
Local Standard of Care; Mefloquine at Week 8
Participants were randomized to receive local standard of care, which may have included any treatment or procedure that the Investigator would normally use in the treatment of a PML patient at their study site or hospital. These participants chose to add 250 mg mefloquine by mouth at Week 8 for 3 days and then weekly through Week 24 to their local standard of care treatment.
5
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mg
Participants were randomized to receive local standard of care (which may have included any treatment or procedure that the Investigator would normally use in the treatment of a PML patient at their study site or hospital) and 250 mg mefloquine by mouth on Days 0, 1, and 2 and then weekly through Week 24.
20
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0001
Overall StudyDeath2006
Overall StudyOther, reason not provided2404
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0020
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3002

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLocal Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgLocal Standard of Care; Mefloquine at Week 8Local Standard of Care; Mefloquine at Week 4Local Standard of Care
Age, Continuous47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.16
48.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.37
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.56
Disease history
HIV negative
8 participants4 participants1 participants0 participants3 participants
Disease history
HIV positive: HAART Naive
24 participants13 participants3 participants5 participants3 participants
Disease history
HIV positive: History of HAART
5 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
JVC Titer at Screening
<= 50 copies/mL
4 participants4 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
JVC Titer at Screening
> 50 copies/mL
32 participants15 participants5 participants5 participants7 participants
JVC Titer at Screening
Missing
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants16 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants15 Participants3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 174 / 55 / 519 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 171 / 53 / 513 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

Change from baseline to Week 4 in JC viral load in CSF is expressed as log10 copies/mL. Negative values indicate a reduction in viral load. Only participants with measurable baseline values are included. Post-baseline values of 'Below the Limit of Quantification' or 'Below Limit of Detection' or 'Negative' were set to 50. Log10 (50) = 1.699

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4

Population: Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.~Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline were not included in the efficacy analysis. All other enrolled participants were included in the efficacy analysis if values for Week 4 were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)-0.2424 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.83556
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)-0.0675 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.52685
p-value: 0.7132Student's t-test
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

Change from baseline to Week 8 in JC viral load in CSF is expressed as log10 copies/mL. Negative values indicate a reduction in viral load. Only participants with measurable baseline values are included. Post-baseline values of 'Below the Limit of Quantification' or 'Below Limit of Detection' or 'Negative' were set to 50. Log10 (50) = 1.699

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 8

Population: Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.~Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline were not included in the efficacy analysis. All other enrolled participants were included in the efficacy analysis if values for Week 8 were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 8 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)-0.2843 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.68666
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 8 in JC Virus (JCV) Load in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)-0.3455 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.9396
p-value: 0.9086Student's t-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index Score

The KPS Index classifies participants' functional impairment. KPS can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the KPS score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. The KPS index is subdivided into 3 categories: incapacitated (0 to 40), self-care (50 to 70), and normal activity (80 to 100). Negative change from baseline scores indicate improved prognosis.

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline by the central laboratory were not included in the efficacy analysis.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index ScoreWeek 4 (n=12, 21)0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.771
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index ScoreWeek 8 (n=7, 16)-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.46
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index ScoreWeek 4 (n=12, 21)-8.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.891
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Index ScoreWeek 8 (n=7, 16)-10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Participants rate their neurological function on a scale of 100 mm line, where the 0 end of the scale indicates poor neurological function and 100 indicates excellent neurological function. VAS was not required for participants who had physical or cognitive impairments that limited their ability to perform the assessment. Negative change from baseline scores indicates a worsening outcome.

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. VAS was not required for participants who had physical or cognitive impairments that limited their ability to perform the assessment.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 (n=9,16)8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.14
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 (n=4,13)26.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 49
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 4 (n=9,16)-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.71
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Participants' Neurological Function Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Week 8 (n=4,13)3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

The SDMT is a simple substitution task. The test gives participants 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures as a measure for screening cognitive impairment. The total score is the total number of correctly completed boxes in the time allowed. The test score range is from 0 (worst outcome) to 110 (best outcome). Negative change from baseline scores indicates a worsening outcome.

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. SDMT was not required for participants who had physical or cognitive impairments that limited their ability to perform the assessment.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Week 4 (n=6,8)4.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.723
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Week 8 (n=3,6)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.12
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Week 4 (n=6,8)-1.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)Week 8 (n=3,6)3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' Brains

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline by the central laboratory were not included in the efficacy analysis.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,11)0.1407 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.20345
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,11)0.0248 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.12425
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,11)0.1631 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.22523
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T1 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,11)0.1029 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.26502
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' Brains

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline by the central laboratory were not included in the efficacy analysis.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,11)0.1704 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.22012
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,10)0.1738 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.21454
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,11)0.1619 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.17501
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in T2 Lesion Volume as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,10)0.1050 log10 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.23429
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score

EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death) was calculated. Negative change scores indicate improvement.

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4 and 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. EDSS was not required for participants who had physical or cognitive impairments that limited their ability to perform the assessment.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreWeek 4 (n=12, 21)0.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.054
Local Standard of CareChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreWeek 8 (n=7, 16)0.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.868
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreWeek 4 (n=12, 21)0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.129
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgChange From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 8 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) ScoreWeek 8 (n=7, 16)0.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Secondary

Participants Who Died Within 6 Months

The death event is counted under the treatment arm relative to adding mefloquine to the treatment regimen.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 6 months

Population: Safety population: All participants who enrolled in the study and were dosed, and who have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.~The death event is counted under the treatment arm relative to adding mefloquine to the treatment regimen.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Local Standard of CareParticipants Who Died Within 6 Months2 participants
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgParticipants Who Died Within 6 Months5 participants
Secondary

Participants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' Brains

Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Week 4, Week 8

Population: Participants with values at the time frames being measured. Participants with undetectable CSF JCV load at baseline by the central laboratory were not included in the efficacy analysis.~Local standard of care participants who added mefloquine at Week 4 or Week 8 were counted as being dosed under both treatment arms.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Local Standard of CareParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 0 (n=15,21)8 participants
Local Standard of CareParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,12)5 participants
Local Standard of CareParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,11)1 participants
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 0 (n=15,21)8 participants
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 4 (n=12,12)8 participants
Local Standard of Care Plus Mefloquine 250 mgParticipants With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8 as Seen on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans of Participants' BrainsWeek 8 (n=5,11)7 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026