Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Automatic Testing Feature in New ICDs and CRT-Ds

A Clinical Evaluation of the Current™ Radio Frequency (RF) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Models 2215/1215 and Promote™ RF Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) Model 3215 Pulse Generators

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00746356
Enrollment
128
Registered
2008-09-04
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2019-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Ventricular Arrythmias

Keywords

heart failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy, autocapture, Current RF, Promote RF

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical trial that will assess the safety and effectiveness of investigational models of the Promote™ RF CRT-D and Current™ RF ICD devices. These new ICD and CRT-D devices have new features that allow the device to periodically check how much energy is needed to pace a patient's heart and to automatically adjust the amount of energy used to pace the heart.

Detailed description

All patients enrolled in the study will have their device tested to determine if the device can automatically measure how much energy is needed to pace the patient's heart. If the test is successful, the patient's device will be programmed to turn that feature on. 3 months after enrollment, the patient will return to the clinic to have their device re-tested using an automatic test method to measure the amount of energy needed to make the patient's heart beat. A manual test method will also be used to measure the amount of energy needed to make the patient's heart beat. The intent of the study is to show the automatic method works just as well as the manual method.

Interventions

DEVICETesting of the autocapture features of the device

Patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy will have new autocapture features tested on right atrial, right ventricular and left ventricular leads.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have an approved indication, as outlined by American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/HRS) guidelines, for implantation of an ICD or CRT-D for the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia(s) or heart failure, or undergo revision of their ICD or CRT-D system to replace the pulse generator. * Have the ability to provide informed consent for study participation and be willing and able to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

* Have a classification of Status 1 for cardiac transplantation or consideration for transplantation over the next 3 months. * Have had a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), Stent or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft(CABG)) within 40 days of enrollment. * Have had a recent cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months of enrollment. * Are allergic to dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP). * Be currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm. * Be pregnant or are planning for pregnancy within 6 months following enrollment. * Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months. * Be less than 18 years of age.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Free of System-related Complications at 3-months Post Implant3 months post implant
Atrial AutoCapture (ACap) Confirm Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test3 months post implantAtrial AutoCapture Confirm is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the atrial pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the atria. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the atrial pulse voltage and determines the atrial threshold by viewing the EKG.
Ventricular Autocapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test3 months post implantVentricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.
Right Ventricular (RV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test3 months post implantRight Ventricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.
Left Ventricular (LV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test3 months post implantLeft Ventricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in August 2008 at hospitals where patients were being implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillators or in and physician offices where these patients were being followed. Recruitment was completed on April 1, 2009.

Pre-assignment details

All patients who were enrolled in the study had the autocapture feature tested at each study visit, starting with at the implant visit when the study device was implanted.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Patients
All patients enrolled in the study
128
Total128

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath73
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPatient relocated10
Overall StudyRemoval of Device01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Patients
Age, Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Cardiomyopathy
Ischemic Etiology
87 Participants
Cardiomyopathy
Non-Ischemic Etiology
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 128
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 128

Outcome results

Primary

Atrial AutoCapture (ACap) Confirm Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test

Atrial AutoCapture Confirm is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the atrial pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the atria. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the atrial pulse voltage and determines the atrial threshold by viewing the EKG.

Time frame: 3 months post implant

Population: Per protocol, the first 19 participants who successfully completed both an automatic and manual capture threshold test were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesAtrial AutoCapture (ACap) Confirm Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestAtrial AutoCapture Threshold0.743 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.357
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesAtrial AutoCapture (ACap) Confirm Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestManual Capture Threshold0.737 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.195
Comparison: The null hypothesis was rejected at significance level 1.67% if the mean difference between the automatic test and the manual test was \<0.25 volts.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Left Ventricular (LV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test

Left Ventricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.

Time frame: 3 months post implant

Population: Per protocol, the first 43 CRT-D participants who successfully completed both an automatic and manual threshold in the left ventricle were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesLeft Ventricular (LV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestAutomatic Capture Threshold1.458 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.631
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesLeft Ventricular (LV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestManual Capture Threshold1.456 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.618
Comparison: The null hypothesis was rejected at significance level 1.67% if the mean difference between the automatic test and the manual test was \<0.25 volts.p-value: 0.0001t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Percentage of Participants Free of System-related Complications at 3-months Post Implant

Time frame: 3 months post implant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesPercentage of Participants Free of System-related Complications at 3-months Post Implant93.6 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Right Ventricular (RV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test

Right Ventricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.

Time frame: 3 months post implant

Population: Per protocol, the first 43 CRT-D participants who successfully completed both an automatic and manual capture threshold in the right ventricle were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesRight Ventricular (RV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestAutomatic Capture Threshold0.739 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.279
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesRight Ventricular (RV) AutoCapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestManual Capture Threshold0.794 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.278
Comparison: The null hypothesis was rejected at significance level 1.67% if the mean difference between the automatic test and the manual test was \<0.25 volts.p-value: 0.0001t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Ventricular Autocapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold Test

Ventricular AutoCapture is an automatic test that the device performs without any interaction by the physician and is one of the features being evaluated in the study. The test temporarily decreases the ventricular pacing voltage until it determines that the device is no longer capturing the ventricles. That value is reported to the physician when the device is read by the programmer. This endpoint looks at the absolute difference between this automated test and a manual test in which the physician decreases the ventricular pulse voltage and determines the ventricular threshold by viewing the EKG.

Time frame: 3 months post implant

Population: Per protocol, the first 38 participants with an ICD who successfully completed both an automatic and manual capture threshold test were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesVentricular Autocapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestAutomatic Capture Threshold0.809 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.405
Participants Successfully Implanted With DevicesVentricular Autocapture Effectiveness Endpoint - Absolute Difference Between the Automatic and Manual Capture Threshold TestManual Capture Threshold0.862 VoltsStandard Deviation 0.442
Comparison: The null hypothesis was rejected at significance level 1.67% if the mean difference between the automatic test and the manual test was \<0.25 volts.p-value: 0.0001t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026