Skip to content

Immediate Management of the Patient With Rupture : Open Versus Endovascular Repair

Can Emergency Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (eEVAR) Improve the Survival From Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00746122
Acronym
IMPROVE
Enrollment
613
Registered
2008-09-03
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2016-07-21
Last updated
2019-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Keywords

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether a strategy of endovascular repair (if aortic morphology is suitable, open repair if not) versus open repair reduces early mortality for patients with suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

Detailed description

Rupture of the main blood vessel of the body in the abdomen (ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm) is fatal in over three-quarters of cases. In the past, those that survive have reached hospital alive and undergone emergency open surgery to repair the aneurysm and stop the bleeding: however, after this major emergency surgery only half the patients leave hospital alive. A newer, less-invasive method of aneurysm repair, endovascular repair, is based on repairing the aneurysm by inserting the repair graft up through one of the arteries in the groin. Endovascular repair has been tested in the elective situation and is associated with a 3-fold reduction in operative mortality versus the standard open surgery. Early work with selected patients has suggested that endovascular repair may be associated with up to a 2-fold reduction in operative mortality and more rapid recovery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, only 55-70% patients are anatomically suitable for endovascular repair. Therefore, this research aims to determine whether a strategy of preferential emergency endovascular repair reduces both the mortality and cost of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Critically ill patients with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm will be randomised, in the emergency room, to a strategy of endovascular repair if possible (endovascular first) or to current standard care (immediate transfer to the operating theatre for emergency open surgery). Patients randomised to endovascular first will require a specialist radiological examination (computed tomography, CT scan) to assess anatomical suitability and plan for endovascular repair. This will cause a short delay before definitive repair can be commenced. Those patients not suitable for endovascular repair, after CT scan, will be taken for standard open surgery. Patients will be randomised at 16-20 specialist centres in the United Kingdom (UK), who have already attained sufficient experience in using endovascular repair for ruptured aneurysms and can offer a routine service. The primary outcome measure is 30-day operative mortality, which we hope will improve by 14% with the endovascular first strategy (from 47% to 33%). Secondary outcome measures include 24h, in-hospital and 1-year and 3-year mortality, re-interventions associated with the two treatment strategies as well as quality of life, costs and cost-effectiveness. The research team includes specialists in clinical trials, health economics, statistics, pre-hospital & emergency care, interventional radiology, vascular & endovascular surgery, critical care, aneurysm research and a service user.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen repair

Standard treatment of emergency open surgery

PROCEDUREEVAR

Emergency endovascular aneurysm repair

Sponsors

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cambridge
CollaboratorOTHER
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
St George's, University of London
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical suspicion of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after review in Accident and Emergency (or other hospital unit). * Men and women over the age of 50 years will be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known connective tissue disorders (eg Marfan syndrome) where endovascular repair may not be beneficial. * Patients with known previous repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, because procedures either open or endovascular are likely to be very complex and there are no guidelines for anatomical restriction to repair. * Deeply unconscious and moribund patients since the chances of recovery are minimal.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality30 days, 1-year and 3-years from randomisationMortality, at 3 pre-specified time points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation3-years from randomisationQALYs are a product of length of life and quality of life, since both of these are important to patients. Therefore, it is a measure of the state of health of a person or group in which the benefits, in terms of length of life, are adjusted to reflect the quality of life. One QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health. QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment or intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). It is often measured in terms of the person's ability to carry out the activities of daily life, and freedom from pain and mental disturbance.
Hospital Costs to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation3 yearsHospital costs to enable cost-effectiveness evaluation in Pounds (£)

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment from 1st September 2009 to 31st July 2013. After 600 recruitment target 13 more patients were randomised before sites could be closed down.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusions: persons younger than 50 years, prior AAA repair

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Open Repair
Immediate Open Surgery Open repair: Standard treatment of emergency open surgery
297
Endovascular Strategy
Endovascular strategy involves immediate computed tomography (CT) and emergency EVAR, with open repair for patients anatomically unsuitable for EVAR EVAR: Emergency endovascular aneurysm repair
316
Total613

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOpen RepairEndovascular StrategyTotal
Age, Continuous76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
6 participants7 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
291 participants309 participants600 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants70 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
234 Participants246 Participants480 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
297 / 297316 / 316
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 2435 / 259
serious
Total, serious adverse events
125 / 297117 / 316

Outcome results

Primary

Mortality

Mortality, at 3 pre-specified time points

Time frame: 30 days, 1-year and 3-years from randomisation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Open RepairMortality1-year mortality133 Participants
Open RepairMortality3-year mortality165 Participants
Open RepairMortality30-day mortality111 Participants
Endovascular StrategyMortality30-day mortality112 Participants
Endovascular StrategyMortality1-year mortality130 Participants
Endovascular StrategyMortality3-year mortality151 Participants
Secondary

Hospital Costs to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation

Hospital costs to enable cost-effectiveness evaluation in Pounds (£)

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open RepairHospital Costs to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation19483 GBP (£)Standard Deviation 22412
Endovascular StrategyHospital Costs to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation16878 GBP (£)Standard Deviation 19624
Secondary

Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation

QALYs are a product of length of life and quality of life, since both of these are important to patients. Therefore, it is a measure of the state of health of a person or group in which the benefits, in terms of length of life, are adjusted to reflect the quality of life. One QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health. QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment or intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). It is often measured in terms of the person's ability to carry out the activities of daily life, and freedom from pain and mental disturbance.

Time frame: 3-years from randomisation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Open RepairQuality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation0.97 life-yearsStandard Deviation 1.02
Endovascular StrategyQuality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) to Enable Cost-effectiveness Evaluation1.14 life-yearsStandard Deviation 1.03

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026