Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) for Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Lu AA21004 in Acute Treatment of Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00744627
Enrollment
301
Registered
2008-09-01
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2014-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Keywords

Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Drug Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, once daily (QD), in adults with Generalized Anxiety Disorders.

Detailed description

The drug that was tested in this study is called Vortioxetine. Vortioxetine is being tested to treat anxiety in adults who have general anxiety disorder (GAD). This study looked at GAD relief in people who took vortioxetine. The study enrolled 301 patients. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which remained undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there was an urgent medical need): * Vortioxetine 5 mg * Placebo (dummy inactive pill) - this was a capsule that looked like the study drug but had no active ingredient. All participants were asked to take one capsule at the same time each day throughout the study. This multi-center trial was conducted in Europe. The overall time to participate in this study was up to 13 weeks. Participants made 7 visits to the clinic, and were contacted by telephone 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.

Interventions

DRUGVortioxetine

Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate-release tablets.

DRUGPlacebo

Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

H. Lundbeck A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Suffers from a primary diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. * Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score ≥20 at Screening and Baseline. * Has a Hamilton Anxiety Scale score ≥2 on both Item 1 (anxious mood) and Item 2 (tension) at Screening and Baseline. * Has a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≤16 at Screening and Baseline. * Male and females of childbearing potential who are sexually active agree to use adequate contraception from Screening throughout the duration of the study and for 1 month after the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion criteria

* Has received any investigational compound \<30 days before Screening or 5 half-lives prior to Screening. * Has received Lu AA21004 in a previous clinical study or as a therapeutic agent. * Has 1 or more of the following: * Any current psychiatric disorder other than Generalized Anxiety Disorder as defined in the DSM-IV-TR. * Current or past history of: manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in the DSM-IV-TR. * Any substance disorder (except nicotine and caffeine) within the previous 6 months as defined in the DSM-IV-TR. * Presence or history of a clinically significant neurological disorder (including epilepsy). * Neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington disease, etc). * Any Axis II disorder that might compromise the study. * Is required to take excluded medications or it is anticipated that the participant will require treatment with at least 1 of the disallowed concomitant medications during the study including: * Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs * Rifampin * Macrolide antibiotics * Hormones * Hypoglycemic agents and Insulin * Systemic steroids * Antineoplastics * Antiobesity agents * Antidiarrheal agents (episodic use allowed) * Antifungal agents (episodic topical use allowed) * Antihistamines (episodic use of loratadine, desloratadine, cetirizine allowed) * Cough/cold agents (episodic use allowed but preparations containing pseudoephedrine and narcotics are NOT allowed) * Diuretics (episodic use allowed) * Has a significant risk of suicide according to the investigator's opinion or has a score ≥5 on item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or has made a suicide attempt in the previous 6 months. * Has previously failed to respond to adequate treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. * Has received electroconvulsive therapy within 6 months prior to Screening. * Is currently receiving formal cognitive or behavioral therapy, systematic psychotherapy, or plans to initiate such therapy during the study. * Has a clinically significant unstable illness, for example, hepatic impairment or renal insufficiency, or a cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, rheumatologic, immunologic, infectious, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, or metabolic disturbance. * Has an alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin level \>1.5 times the upper limits of normal. * Has a serum creatinine of \>1.5 times the upper limits of normal. * Has a previous history of cancer that had been in remission for less than 5 years prior to the first dose of study medication. This criterion does not include those participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. * Has clinically significant abnormal vital signs as determined by the investigator. * Has 1 or more laboratory values outside the normal range, based on the blood or urine samples taken at Screening, that are considered by the investigator to be clinically significant. * Has thyroid stimulating hormone value outside the normal range at Screening and is deemed clinically significant by the investigator. * Has an abnormal electrocardiogram as determined by the central reader and confirmed as clinically significant by the investigator. * Has a disease or takes medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the assessments of safety, tolerability, or efficacy. * Has previously participated in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. Least Squares (LS) means were from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 8Baseline and Week 8Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Baseline to Week 8The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6.The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1 and 4The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1, 2 and 4The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).
Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness on the following scale: 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 1, 4 and 8The HAD-Depression subscale is completed by the participant and measures depression, focusing on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response. The subscale is made up of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Participants are required to indicate the response which most accurately reflects the way they have felt over the last few days. The item scores are summed and the total subscore ranges from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2 and 4The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The physical functioning subscale assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-physical subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The bodily pain sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The general health sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-emotional subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedBaseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The mental health sub-score assesses general mental health (psychological distress and well-being) and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.
Health Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline and Week 8Healthcare resource utilization was assessed by the Health Economic Assessment (HEA) questionnaire, which monitors the participants absenteeism from work, as well as resource use such as visits to a general practitioner, outpatient and inpatient services, hospitalization, medications, and other relevant services over the past 8 weeks.
Percentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8Remission is defined as a Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score ≤ 7. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).

Countries

Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, Ukraine

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 47 investigative sites in Europe from 23 September 2008 to 07 July 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder were enrolled equally in one of two treatment groups, once a day placebo or 5 mg vortioxetine.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Vortioxetine placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
151
Vortioxetine 5 mg
Vortioxetine 5 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
150
Total301

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event69
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy73
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyNoncompliance01
Overall StudyOther10
Overall StudyProtocol Deviations02
Overall StudyVoluntary Withdrawal96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVortioxetine 5 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.07
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.49
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.76
Age, Customized
≤55 years
111 participants112 participants223 participants
Age, Customized
>55 years
39 participants39 participants78 participants
Alcohol Consumption
2 to 6 times per week
10 participants6 participants16 participants
Alcohol Consumption
Daily
3 participants4 participants7 participants
Alcohol Consumption
Never
47 participants49 participants96 participants
Alcohol Consumption
Once a week
18 participants15 participants33 participants
Alcohol Consumption
Once monthly or less often
72 participants77 participants149 participants
Body Mass Index25.69 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.419
26.29 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.98
25.99 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.71
Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale score4.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
4.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
4.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.69
Hamilton Anxiety Scale Total Score26.3 scores on a a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.92
26.8 scores on a a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95
26.6 scores on a a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.94
Height168.21 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.653
169.56 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.457
168.89 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.075
Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Anxiety subscale13.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
14.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.08
14.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.04
Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale7.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.89
7.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.03
7.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score12.25 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.219
12.12 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.375
12.18 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.296
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian (White, including Hispanic)
150 participants151 participants301 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
5 participants8 participants13 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic/Non-Latino
145 participants143 participants288 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
3 participants7 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
37 participants34 participants71 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
5 participants7 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
11 participants8 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
31 participants28 participants59 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
49 participants48 participants97 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
11 participants14 participants25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants93 Participants196 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants58 Participants105 Participants
Smoking Classification
Current Smoker
38 participants29 participants67 participants
Smoking Classification
Ex-smoker
22 participants23 participants45 participants
Smoking Classification
Never Smoked
90 participants99 participants189 participants
Weight72.97 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.981
75.76 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.37
74.37 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.729

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 15048 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1500 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8

The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. Least Squares (LS) means were from a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set included all patients who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and had at least 1 post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8-10.49 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.697
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8-14.30 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.695
Comparison: P-values were tested at the 5% level of significance (ie, statistical significance if P\<0.05). To control for multiplicity, a pre-specified sequential testing procedure was applied to compare 5 mg vortioxetine to placebo; as soon as an endpoint was non-significant at 0.05, the testing procedure stopped for all subsequent endpoints.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.74, -1.88]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The bodily pain sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)6.49 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.702
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)6.81 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.875
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)10.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.903
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)7.40 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.681
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)10.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.856
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Bodily Pain Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)15.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.883
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The general health sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)4.54 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.992
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)8.45 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.292
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)9.76 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.409
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)6.04 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.979
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)10.36 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.28
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) General Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)16.30 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.396
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The mental health sub-score assesses general mental health (psychological distress and well-being) and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)5.58 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.166
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)9.79 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.432
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)13.51 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.693
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)21.75 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.681
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)8.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.152
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Health Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)14.73 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.421
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The physical functioning subscale assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)2.54 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)2.15 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.149
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)4.48 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.271
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)3.39 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.146
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)8.34 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.137
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)10.69 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.258
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-emotional subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)7.27 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)13.41 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.871
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)18.96 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.138
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)9.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.463
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)19.04 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.856
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Emotional Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)28.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.121
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The role-physical subscale assesses limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)8.96 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.897
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)4.72 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.488
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)6.89 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.592
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)5.99 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.474
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)11.89 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.578
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Role-Physical Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)18.39 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)8.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.536
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)11.41 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.773
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)8.83 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.519
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)18.45 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.758
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 8

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The social functioning subscale assesses limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems. The sub-score scale ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 818.02 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.991
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Social Functioning Subscore at Week 826.80 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.974
Comparison: Results presented are for the number of participants at week 8 only.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [3.32, 14.25]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week Assessed

The Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (best) - 100 (worst). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set with available data at Baseline. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)5.44 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.275
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)8.36 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n= 128, 129)12.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.686
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 149)8.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.261
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)13.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.486
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality Subscore at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n= 128, 129)22.53 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.671
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week Assessed

The Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness on the following scale: 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)-0.53 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)-1.09 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)-0.87 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=126, 128)-1.26 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.096
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-0.23 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.039
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=126, 128)-1.78 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-0.19 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.039
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)-0.60 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)-1.04 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity of Illness at Each Week AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)-1.40 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed

The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6.

Population: The Full Analysis Set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)-5.05 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.407
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-2.46 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.272
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)-7.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.539
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)-9.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.609
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)-11.93 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.608
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)-9.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.538
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-2.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)-6.21 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.408
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed

The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2 and 4

Population: Full analysis set where Baseline data were available. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used. n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=121, 117)-1.32 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.314
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=122, 114)-2.93 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=112, 107)-4.35 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.546
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=121, 117)-1.12 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.329
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=122, 114)-3.04 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.459
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=112, 107)-5.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.566
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8

The Sheehan Disability Scale assesses functional impairment in 3 domains: work/school, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each aspect is impaired on a 10-point visual analog scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). The 3 scores are added together to calculate the total score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating more impairment. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8-6.14 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.631
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 8-8.10 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.656
p-value: 0.03195% CI: [-3.74, -0.18]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25

The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6

Population: Full analysis set patients with a HAM-A Baseline score ≥25. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 1 (n=100, 95)-2.64 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.332
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 2 (n=99, 92)-4.89 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.507
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 4 (n=89, 89)-7.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.694
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 6 (n=83, 83)-9.02 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.763
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 6 (n=83, 83)-12.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.771
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 1 (n=100, 95)-2.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.341
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 4 (n=89, 89)-10.08 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.702
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25Week 2 (n=99, 92)-6.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.522
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25

The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 to 56 where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe. Total scores above 30 are rare, but indicate very severe anxiety. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Full analysis set patients with a HAM-A Baseline score ≥25. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25-10.44 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.895
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score at Week 8 in Participants With Baseline HAM-A ≥25-15.55 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.904
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-7.61, -2.6]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks Assessed

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1 and 4

Population: The Full Analysis Set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-1.42 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.226
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=140, 140)-3.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.298
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-1.14 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.223
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=140, 140)-4.07 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.296
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety sub-scale consists of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety). The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts and panic attacks. Scores are summed and range from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8-4.20 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.396
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Anxiety Subscale at Week 8-6.49 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.393
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.39, -1.2]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week Assessed

The HAD-Depression subscale is completed by the participant and measures depression, focusing on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response. The subscale is made up of 7 items that are assessed on a scale from 0 (no depression) to 3 (severe feeling of depression). Participants are required to indicate the response which most accurately reflects the way they have felt over the last few days. The item scores are summed and the total subscore ranges from 0 to 21 (maximal severity). LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 4 and 8

Population: The Full Analysis Set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-0.18 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.178
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=140, 140)-1.08 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.245
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)-1.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.297
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)-0.28 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.176
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=140, 140)-1.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.245
Vortioxetine 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Depression Subscale at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=128, 129)-3.18 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.295
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks Assessed

The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with Baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6

Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used; n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)3.58 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.053
PlaceboClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)2.99 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)3.31 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)2.74 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Vortioxetine 5 mgClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=147, 144)3.10 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Vortioxetine 5 mgClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)3.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.053
Vortioxetine 5 mgClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=128, 129)2.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.086
Vortioxetine 5 mgClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=136, 137)2.66 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 8

The Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement scale assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician relative to Baseline on a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. LS means were from a MMRM with baseline-by-week, center, week and week-by-treatment as factors in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Full analysis set. A mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) based on observed cases was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 82.66 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.098
Vortioxetine 5 mgClinical Global Impression Scale-Global Improvement at Week 82.19 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.098
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.73, -0.19]Mixed model for repeated measurements
Secondary

Health Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment Questionnaire

Healthcare resource utilization was assessed by the Health Economic Assessment (HEA) questionnaire, which monitors the participants absenteeism from work, as well as resource use such as visits to a general practitioner, outpatient and inpatient services, hospitalization, medications, and other relevant services over the past 8 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Full analysis set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Hospitalization related to anxiety4 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any resource use14 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any hospitalization-related services7 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any hospitalization-related service0 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Hospitalization related to anxiety0 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any sick leave7 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any sick leave2 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any resource use79 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Sick leave related to anxiety2 participants
PlaceboHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Sick leave related to anxiety4 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Sick leave related to anxiety3 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any resource use84 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any hospitalization-related services3 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Hospitalization related to anxiety2 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Any sick leave7 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireBaseline: Sick leave related to anxiety4 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any resource use25 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Hospitalization related to anxiety0 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any sick leave4 participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgHealth Care Resource Utilization as Assessed by the Health Economic Assessment QuestionnaireWeek 8: Any hospitalization-related service1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week Assessed

Remission is defined as a Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score ≤ 7. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

Population: Full analysis set; Last observation carried forward was used. n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=148, 149)2.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 6 (n=148, 149)12.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=148, 149)6.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=148, 149)17.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)0 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 8 (n=148, 149)30.2 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)0 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 2 (n=148, 149)2.7 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 4 (n=148, 149)8.7 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Participants in HAM-A Remission at Each Week AssessedWeek 6 (n=148, 149)16.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks Assessed

Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6

Population: Full analysis set; Last observation carried forward was used. n indicates the number of patients included in the analysis at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)2.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=148, 149)20.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=148, 149)12.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=148, 149)29.7 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 2 (n=148, 149)12.1 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 1 (n=146, 148)2.0 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 6 (n=148, 149)43.6 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Other Weeks AssessedWeek 4 (n=148, 149)28.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 8

Response was defined as participants with a ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score. The HAM-A is an anxiety rating scale consisting of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behavior at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 56 (maximum severity).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Full analysis set; Last observation carried forward was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 839.9 percentage of participants
Vortioxetine 5 mgPercentage of Responders in HAM-A Total Score at Week 861.7 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.496, 3.83]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026