Skip to content

Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel Plus Dasatinib to Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

A Randomized Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial Comparing Docetaxel Combined With Dasatinib to Docetaxel Combined With Placebo in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00744497
Acronym
READY
Enrollment
1930
Registered
2008-09-01
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether survival can be prolonged in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who receive dasatinib with docetaxel and prednisone.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo
DRUGDasatinib
DRUGDocetaxel
DRUGPrednisone

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of histologically diagnosed prostate cancer * Evidence of metastatic disease by any 1 of the following: computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan, or skeletal survey * Evidence of progression, as defined by 1 of the following: rising prostate specific antigen levels at least 1 week apart with the final value being \>=2 ng/mL; progression of measurable nodal or visceral disease, with nodal lesions \>=20 mm and visceral lesions measurable per response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors, version 1); 2 or more lesions appearing on bone scan compared with previous scan; or local recurrence in the prostate or prostate bed * Maintaining castrate status: Participants who have not undergone surgical orchiectomy should have received and continue on medical therapies, such as gonadotropin releasing hormone analogs, to maintain castrate levels of serum testosterone \<=50 ng/dL * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2 * At least 4 weeks since an investigational agent prior to starting study therapy * At least 8 weeks since radioisotope therapy prior to starting study therapy * Recovery from any local therapy including surgery or radiation/radiotherapy for a minimum of 7 days prior to starting study therapy * Required initial laboratory values: white blood cell count \>=3,000/mm\^3; absolute neutrophil count \>=1,500/mm\^3; platelet count \>=100,000/mm\^3; creatinine level \<=1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN); bilirubin \<=ULN; aspartate aminotransferase \<=2.5\*ULN; alanine aminotransferase \<=2.5\*ULN.

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases or leptomeningeal metastases * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction; ventricular tachyarrhythmia within 6 months; prolonged QTc \>450 msec; ejection fraction \<40%; or major conduction abnormality, unless a cardiac pacemaker is present * Pleural or pericardial effusion of any Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade * Peripheral neuropathy CTC Grade \>=2 * Currently active second malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancers. Participants are not considered to have a currently active malignancy if they have completed therapy and are now considered (by their physician) to be at less than 30% risk for relapse * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including ongoing or active infection, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * HIV infection-positive patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to the investigational agents * Receipt of any other investigational agents for the treatment of prostate cancer * Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, with the exception of estramustine * Patients may continue on a daily multivitamin but must discontinue all other herbal, alternative, and food supplements before enrollment * Ketoconazole must be discontinued 4 weeks prior to starting study therapy * Antiandrogens must be discontinued prior to starting study therapy. Patients with a history of response to an antiandrogen and subsequent progression while on that antiandrogen should be assessed for antiandrogen withdrawal response for 4 weeks. Observation for antiandrogen withdrawal response is not necessary for those who have never responded to antiandrogens * Bisphosphonates must not be initiated within 28 days prior to starting study therapy * QT prolonging agents strongly associated with torsade de pointes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival: Time From Randomization to Date of DeathFrom randomization to death or date of last contact (maximum reached: 45 months)Overall survival is defined as time in months from the randomization date to the date of death due to any cause (in the randomized population). If the patient did not die, survival was censored on the last date he or she was known to be alive.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First Skeletal-related Event (SRE)From day of randomization to date of first SRE or to last SRE assessment, if subsequent cancer therapy begun or no SRE (maximum reached: 42 months)Time to first SRE is defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of first SRE (unless SRE occurred while the patient was undergoing subsequent cancer therapy). Participants with a first SRE while on subsequent cancer therapy, those who died without a reported SRE, and those who did not have an SRE were censored on the date of their last SRE assessment prior to start of subsequent cancer therapy, if any. Participants who had no SRE assessments were censored on the day they were randomized.
Percentage of Participants With A Reduction in Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx) Level From BaselineAt baseline, prior to each docetaxel infusion (every 3 weeks) to end of treatment, at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 14 days of end of dosing)The percentage of participants who had an on-study uNTx value confirmed (at least 3 weeks later) within normal limits (or ≥3 and \<60 nmol/mmol creatinine, if normal limits were missing) or an on-study uNTx level reduction from baseline of ≥35%, even when on-study uNTx value remained abnormal.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)At baseline and every 12 weeks thereafter to end of treatment, at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 42 days of end of dosing)Objective tumor response rate=the percentage of randomized participants with a best tumor response of partial (PR) or complete response (CR), within 42 days of end of dosing, divided by total number of patients who were evaluable (with at least 1 target lesion at baseline). By RECIST: CR=disappearance of clinical and radiologic evidence of target and nontarget lesions confirmed by another evaluation at least 6 weeks later. PR=a \>30% or greater decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD confirmed by another evaluation at least 6 weeks later. Stable disease=neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor shrinkage to qualify for PR, and at least 8 weeks since start of study therapy. Progressive disease=a 20% or greater increase in sum of LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LD at or following baseline, or unequivocal progression on existing nontarget lesions, or new lesions are present.
Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ProgressionFrom randomization to date of first PSA measurement leading to confirmed PSA progression (or to last bone scan assessment, if no progression or if cancer therapy started) (maximum reached: 30 months)PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first PSA level measurement that led to confirmed PSA progression, for participants who had not started subsequent cancer therapy. For participants who did not progress or who progressed on cancer therapy, PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the last PSA level measurement before the start of cancer therapy, if any. Participants who had no on-study PSA level measurements were censored on the day they were randomized.
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Pain Intensity From BaselineAt baseline, prior to each docetaxel infusion (every 3 weeks), at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 14 days of end of dosing)The percentage of participants with a reduction in pain intensity from baseline was defined as the number of participants who achieved a 30% or more decrease in pain intensity from baseline for at least 2 consecutive pain assessments (at least 14 days apart) within 14 days of end of dosing divided by the number of randomized participants who had a baseline pain intensity of at least 2. Pain intensity was assessed based on question 3 of the brief pain inventory questionnaire.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From day of randomization to disease progression or death (or to last clinical assessment, if subsequent cancer therapy started or no progression or death) (maximum reached: approximately 43 months)PFS is defined as the time from the randomization date until the date of earliest evidence of disease progression or death, for participants who progressed or died before subsequent cancer therapy. Those who progressed or died while on subsequent cancer therapy and those who did not die or progress were censored at their last radiologic bone scan/imaging, skeletal related-event, or tumor assessment or at measurement of prostate specific antigen levels, whichever occurred last prior to start of subsequent cancer therapy ,if any. Participants with no assessments were censored on the day of randomization.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsContinuously throughout study to <=30 days after last dose of study drug; included AEs with an onset date >= day 1 and <= last dose date + 30 daysAE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Drug-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug
Number of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyAt baseline, approximately 12 weeks after start of treatment, and thereafter whenever clinically indicatedBL=baseline; OS=on-study
Number of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestContinuously throughout study to <=30 days after last dose of study drug; included AEs with an onset date >= day 1 and <= last dose date + 30 daysAE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs of Special Interest=recognized events in other agents within this drug class or events for which safety data from nonclinical and clinical studies with dasatinib indicate that careful evaluation is warranted. Drug-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Drug-related AEs of Special Interest are identified by the medical and safety representatives of the sponsor based on MedDRA preferred terms or laboratory data. ANC=absolute neutrophil count.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyAt baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle) and at end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.Abnormalities were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0, of the National Cancer Institute. CTC are graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening ). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Absolute neutrophil count, Grade 3, neutrophils \<1.0-0.5\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<0.5\*10\^9/L. Hemoglobin, Grade 3, \<4.9-4.0 mmol/L; Grade 4, \<4.0 mmol/L. Platelets, Grade 3, \<50.0-25.0\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<25.0\*10\^9/L. Leukocytes, Grade 3, \<2.0-1.0\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<1.0\*10\^9/L.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesAt baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle), to end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.ALP=alkaline phosphatase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ULN=upper limit of normal. Abnormalities were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0, of the National Cancer Institute. CTC are graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). ALP, ALT, and AST, Grade 3, \>5.0-20.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin, Grade 3, \>3.0-10.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>10.0\*ULN. Creatinine, Grade 3, \>3.0-6.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>6.0\*ULN. Hypercalcemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>3.1-3.4; Grade 4, \>3.4. Hypocalcemia (serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<1.75-1.5; Grade 4, \<1.5. Hyperkalemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>6.0-7.0; Grade 4, \>7.0. Hypokalemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<3.0-2.5; Grade 4, \<2.5. Hypernatremia (serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>155-160; Grade 4, \>160. Hyponatremia (serum sodium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<130-120; Grade 4, \<120. Phosphorus (serum sodium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<0.6-0.3; Grade 4, \<0.3.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisAt baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle), to end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.Abnormal=positive, defined as the presence of \>=30 mg/dL of protein; a small, moderate, or large amount of blood; or \>0 g/dL glucose in urine. BL=baseline; neg=negative
Number of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc IntervalAt baseline, approximately 12 weeks after starting treatment, and then whenever clinically indicated up to within 30 days of end of dosingQTc interval measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). Although a participant may have had several ECGs, only the longest QTc interval was included.
Number of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc IntervalAt baseline, approximately 12 weeks after starting treatment, and then whenever clinically indicated up to within 30 days of end of dosingQTc interval measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). Although a participant may have had several ECGs, only the longest QTc interval was included.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

1930 participants enrolled, 1522 randomized to a treatment group (762 dasatinib, 760 placebo). 408 not randomized. Reasons for non-randomization include 7 adverse events, 42 withdrew consent, 6 deaths, 2 lost to follow up, 3 poor/non compliance, 332 no longer met study criteria, 1 administrative reason by sponsor, and 15 non-specified reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo, given orally once daily, plus docetaxel, 75 mg/m\^2, given intravenously every 3 weeks as a 1-hour infusion, plus prednisone, 5 mg, given orally twice daily
760
Dasatinib
Participants received dasatinib, 100 mg, orally once daily plus docetaxel, 75 mg/m\^2, given intravenously every 3 weeks as a 1-hour infusion, plus prednisone, 5 mg, given orally twice daily
762
Total1,522

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Reason By Sponsor258
Overall StudyAdverse event unrelated to study drug78122
Overall StudyDeath119
Overall StudyDisease progression312219
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up42
Overall StudyMaximum clinical benefit141142
Overall StudyNo longer meets study criteria73
Overall StudyNot defined1913
Overall StudyPatient requested to stop study drug6580
Overall StudyPoor compliance/noncompliance95
Overall StudyStudy drug toxicity68141
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2118

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalDasatinib
Age, Customized
65 to younger than 75 years
323 participants656 participants333 participants
Age, Customized
75 years or older
174 participants352 participants178 participants
Age, Customized
Younger than 65 years
263 participants514 participants251 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
56 Participants111 Participants55 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
34 Participants57 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
24 Participants51 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
645 Participants1301 Participants656 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
760 Participants1522 Participants762 Participants
Type of metastatic disease
Bone disease only
286 Participants593 Participants307 Participants
Type of metastatic disease
Both bone and visceral/nodal disease
399 Participants772 Participants373 Participants
Type of metastatic disease
No evidence of metastatic disease
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Type of metastatic disease
Visceral/nodal disease only
73 Participants153 Participants80 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
701 / 757716 / 761
serious
Total, serious adverse events
317 / 757381 / 761

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival: Time From Randomization to Date of Death

Overall survival is defined as time in months from the randomization date to the date of death due to any cause (in the randomized population). If the patient did not die, survival was censored on the last date he or she was known to be alive.

Time frame: From randomization to death or date of last contact (maximum reached: 45 months)

Population: All participants who were randomized to receive any treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboOverall Survival: Time From Randomization to Date of Death21.2 Months
DasatinibOverall Survival: Time From Randomization to Date of Death21.5 Months
Comparison: Confidence intervals for median overall survival calculated using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Compared survival in arms by 2-sided, alpha=0.0447 level, log-rank test, stratified by bisphosphonate intake (yes/no) and urinary N-telopeptide category (\<60 vs ≥60 nmol/mmol creatinine) defined at randomization. Null hypothesis was survival equal in both arms. Power calculations were that ≥858 deaths would lead to ≥90% power at 5% level for rejecting null hypothesis, given true hazard ratio of 0.8.p-value: 0.900995.53% CI: [0.87, 1.13]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Objective tumor response rate=the percentage of randomized participants with a best tumor response of partial (PR) or complete response (CR), within 42 days of end of dosing, divided by total number of patients who were evaluable (with at least 1 target lesion at baseline). By RECIST: CR=disappearance of clinical and radiologic evidence of target and nontarget lesions confirmed by another evaluation at least 6 weeks later. PR=a \>30% or greater decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions in reference to the baseline sum LD confirmed by another evaluation at least 6 weeks later. Stable disease=neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor shrinkage to qualify for PR, and at least 8 weeks since start of study therapy. Progressive disease=a 20% or greater increase in sum of LD of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of LD at or following baseline, or unequivocal progression on existing nontarget lesions, or new lesions are present.

Time frame: At baseline and every 12 weeks thereafter to end of treatment, at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 42 days of end of dosing)

Population: Participants with at least 1 target lesion at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)31.85 Percentage of participants
DasatinibPercentage of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response by Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)30.45 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The odds ratio is presented for experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.688, 1.271]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Pain Intensity From Baseline

The percentage of participants with a reduction in pain intensity from baseline was defined as the number of participants who achieved a 30% or more decrease in pain intensity from baseline for at least 2 consecutive pain assessments (at least 14 days apart) within 14 days of end of dosing divided by the number of randomized participants who had a baseline pain intensity of at least 2. Pain intensity was assessed based on question 3 of the brief pain inventory questionnaire.

Time frame: At baseline, prior to each docetaxel infusion (every 3 weeks), at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 14 days of end of dosing)

Population: Participants with a baseline pain intensity of 2 or greater

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Pain Intensity From Baseline71.52 Percentage of participants
DasatinibPercentage of Participants With a Reduction in Pain Intensity From Baseline66.59 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The odds ratio is presented for of experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.594, 1.052]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With A Reduction in Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx) Level From Baseline

The percentage of participants who had an on-study uNTx value confirmed (at least 3 weeks later) within normal limits (or ≥3 and \<60 nmol/mmol creatinine, if normal limits were missing) or an on-study uNTx level reduction from baseline of ≥35%, even when on-study uNTx value remained abnormal.

Time frame: At baseline, prior to each docetaxel infusion (every 3 weeks) to end of treatment, at end of treatment, and at follow-up (within 14 days of end of dosing)

Population: Participants who entered the study with baseline urinary N-telopeptide values higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN), or ≥60 nmol/mmol creatinine, if ULN was missing

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With A Reduction in Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx) Level From Baseline60.60 Percentage of participants
DasatinibPercentage of Participants With A Reduction in Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx) Level From Baseline66.04 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The odds ratio is presented for experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.93, 1.763]
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the randomization date until the date of earliest evidence of disease progression or death, for participants who progressed or died before subsequent cancer therapy. Those who progressed or died while on subsequent cancer therapy and those who did not die or progress were censored at their last radiologic bone scan/imaging, skeletal related-event, or tumor assessment or at measurement of prostate specific antigen levels, whichever occurred last prior to start of subsequent cancer therapy ,if any. Participants with no assessments were censored on the day of randomization.

Time frame: From day of randomization to disease progression or death (or to last clinical assessment, if subsequent cancer therapy started or no progression or death) (maximum reached: approximately 43 months)

Population: All participants who were randomized to receive any treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboProgression-free Survival (PFS)11.1 Months
DasatinibProgression-free Survival (PFS)11.8 Months
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The hazard ratio is presented for experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.82, 1.05]
Secondary

Time to First Skeletal-related Event (SRE)

Time to first SRE is defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of first SRE (unless SRE occurred while the patient was undergoing subsequent cancer therapy). Participants with a first SRE while on subsequent cancer therapy, those who died without a reported SRE, and those who did not have an SRE were censored on the date of their last SRE assessment prior to start of subsequent cancer therapy, if any. Participants who had no SRE assessments were censored on the day they were randomized.

Time frame: From day of randomization to date of first SRE or to last SRE assessment, if subsequent cancer therapy begun or no SRE (maximum reached: 42 months)

Population: All participants who were randomized to receive any treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to First Skeletal-related Event (SRE)31.1 Months
DasatinibTime to First Skeletal-related Event (SRE)NA Months
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The hazard ratio is presented for experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.64, 1.02]
Secondary

Time to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first PSA level measurement that led to confirmed PSA progression, for participants who had not started subsequent cancer therapy. For participants who did not progress or who progressed on cancer therapy, PSA progression is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the last PSA level measurement before the start of cancer therapy, if any. Participants who had no on-study PSA level measurements were censored on the day they were randomized.

Time frame: From randomization to date of first PSA measurement leading to confirmed PSA progression (or to last bone scan assessment, if no progression or if cancer therapy started) (maximum reached: 30 months)

Population: All participants who were randomized to receive any treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression6.9 Months
DasatinibTime to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression7.2 Months
Comparison: Since superiority of the dasatinib treatment group was not demonstrated for Overall Survival, secondary endpoints were not tested. The hazard ratio is presented for experimental to control group.95% CI: [0.79, 1.01]
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval

QTc interval measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). Although a participant may have had several ECGs, only the longest QTc interval was included.

Time frame: At baseline, approximately 12 weeks after starting treatment, and then whenever clinically indicated up to within 30 days of end of dosing

Population: All participants who received treatment. n=number evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval<450 msecs (n=600, 548)550 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval450-500 msecs (n=600, 548)43 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>500 msecs (n=600, 548)7 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval<450 msecs (n=600, 548)497 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval450-500 msecs (n=600, 548)48 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants by Maximal On-study Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>500 msecs (n=600, 548)3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and Electrolytes

ALP=alkaline phosphatase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ULN=upper limit of normal. Abnormalities were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0, of the National Cancer Institute. CTC are graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). ALP, ALT, and AST, Grade 3, \>5.0-20.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin, Grade 3, \>3.0-10.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>10.0\*ULN. Creatinine, Grade 3, \>3.0-6.0\*ULN; Grade 4, \>6.0\*ULN. Hypercalcemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>3.1-3.4; Grade 4, \>3.4. Hypocalcemia (serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<1.75-1.5; Grade 4, \<1.5. Hyperkalemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>6.0-7.0; Grade 4, \>7.0. Hypokalemia(serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<3.0-2.5; Grade 4, \<2.5. Hypernatremia (serum calcium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \>155-160; Grade 4, \>160. Hyponatremia (serum sodium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<130-120; Grade 4, \<120. Phosphorus (serum sodium, mmol/L), Grade 3, \<0.6-0.3; Grade 4, \<0.3.

Time frame: At baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle), to end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.

Population: All participants who received treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesTotal bilirubin (All grades)49 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALP (Grades 3 and 4)91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALT (All grades)186 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALT (Grades 3 and 4)5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesAST (All grades)212 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesAST (Grades 3 and 4)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALP (All grades)447 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesTotal bilirubin (Grades 3 and 4)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesCreatinine (All grades)153 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesCreatinine (Grades 3 and 4)3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypercalcemia (All grades)56 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypercalcemia (Grades 3 and 4)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypocalcemia (All grades)308 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypocalcemia (Grades 3 and 4)23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyperkalemia (All grades)164 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyperkalemia (Grades 3 and 4)11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypokalemia (All grades)107 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypokalemia (Grades 3 and 4)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypernatremia (All grades)93 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypernatremia (Grades 3 and 4)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyponatremia (All grades)230 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyponatremia (Grades 3 and 4)36 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesPhosporus (All grades)189 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesPhosphorus (Grades 3 and 4)43 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypocalcemia (All grades)377 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALP (All grades)375 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesPhosphorus (Grades 3 and 4)93 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALP (Grades 3 and 4)68 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypocalcemia (Grades 3 and 4)25 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALT (All grades)256 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypernatremia (Grades 3 and 4)0 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesALT (Grades 3 and 4)6 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyperkalemia (All grades)152 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesAST (All grades)266 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesPhosporus (All grades)257 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesAST (Grades 3 and 4)5 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyperkalemia (Grades 3 and 4)14 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesTotal bilirubin (All grades)41 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyponatremia (All grades)241 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesTotal bilirubin (Grades 3 and 4)3 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypokalemia (All grades)152 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesCreatinine (All grades)184 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypercalcemia (Grades 3 and 4)1 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesCreatinine (Grades 3 and 4)5 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypokalemia (Grades 3 and 4)16 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypercalcemia (All grades)34 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHyponatremia (Grades 3 and 4)43 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests Assessing Liver Function, Renal Function, and ElectrolytesHypernatremia (All grades)101 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in Hematology

Abnormalities were graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0, of the National Cancer Institute. CTC are graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening ). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Absolute neutrophil count, Grade 3, neutrophils \<1.0-0.5\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<0.5\*10\^9/L. Hemoglobin, Grade 3, \<4.9-4.0 mmol/L; Grade 4, \<4.0 mmol/L. Platelets, Grade 3, \<50.0-25.0\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<25.0\*10\^9/L. Leukocytes, Grade 3, \<2.0-1.0\*10\^9/L; Grade 4, \<1.0\*10\^9/L.

Time frame: At baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle) and at end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.

Population: All participants who received treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyAbsolute neutrophil count (All grades)84 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyAbsolute neutrophil count (Grades 3 and 4)41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyHemoglobin (All grades)712 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyHemoglobin (Grades 3 and 4)44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyPlatelets (All grades)108 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyPlatelets (Grades 3 and 4)6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyLeukocytes (All grades)128 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyLeukocytes (Grades 3 and 4)32 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyLeukocytes (Grades 3 and 4)30 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyAbsolute neutrophil count (All grades)161 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyPlatelets (All grades)100 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyAbsolute neutrophil count (Grades 3 and 4)46 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyLeukocytes (All grades)149 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyHemoglobin (All grades)720 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyPlatelets (Grades 3 and 4)3 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests in HematologyHemoglobin (Grades 3 and 4)59 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormal Results in Urinalysis

Abnormal=positive, defined as the presence of \>=30 mg/dL of protein; a small, moderate, or large amount of blood; or \>0 g/dL glucose in urine. BL=baseline; neg=negative

Time frame: At baseline, within 3 days prior to each infusion of docetaxel (each cycle), to end of treatment. If docetaxel is discontinued, every other cycle.

Population: All participants who received treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisProtein, urine: postive246 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisBlood, urine: positive289 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisGlucose, urine: positive179 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisProtein, urine: postive336 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisBlood, urine: positive307 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Abnormal Results in UrinalysisGlucose, urine: positive154 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-study

BL=baseline; OS=on-study

Time frame: At baseline, approximately 12 weeks after start of treatment, and thereafter whenever clinically indicated

Population: All participants who were randomized to receive any treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/absent OS3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/present OS0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/not reported OS1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/ absent OS584 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/present OS24 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/not reported OS132 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial not reported at BL16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF OS <40%2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF OS >=40%607 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF not reported OS151 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF OS <40%2 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/absent OS1 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/not reported OS184 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/present OS1 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF not reported OS194 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion at BL/not reported OS0 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial not reported at BL5 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/ absent OS545 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyLVEF OS >=40%566 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With and Without Pericardial Effusion at Baseline and On-study and With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40% and >=40% On-studyPericardial effusion absent at BL/present OS26 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval

QTc interval measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). Although a participant may have had several ECGs, only the longest QTc interval was included.

Time frame: At baseline, approximately 12 weeks after starting treatment, and then whenever clinically indicated up to within 30 days of end of dosing

Population: All participants who received treatment. n=number evaluable

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval0 to 30 msecs increase (n=591, 540)203 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>30 to 60 msecs increase (n=591, 540)52 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>60 msecs increase (n=591, 540)32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc IntervalDecrease (n=591, 540)304 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc IntervalDecrease (n=591, 540)268 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval0 to 30 msecs increase (n=591, 540)199 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>60 msecs increase (n=591, 540)26 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc Interval>30 to 60 msecs increase (n=591, 540)47 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. AEs of Special Interest=recognized events in other agents within this drug class or events for which safety data from nonclinical and clinical studies with dasatinib indicate that careful evaluation is warranted. Drug-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Drug-related AEs of Special Interest are identified by the medical and safety representatives of the sponsor based on MedDRA preferred terms or laboratory data. ANC=absolute neutrophil count.

Time frame: Continuously throughout study to <=30 days after last dose of study drug; included AEs with an onset date >= day 1 and <= last dose date + 30 days

Population: All participants who received treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestRash46 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestPulmonary arterial hypertension0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Superficial edema77 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestGastrointestinal tract bleeding6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Pleural effusion13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestNausea/vomiting127 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Other37 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestCentral nervous system bleeding1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFatigue216 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestMyalgias/arthralgias29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestOther hemorrhage14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestDiarrhea167 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestPulmonary arterial hypertension0 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestNausea/vomiting170 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFatigue236 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestMyalgias/arthralgias29 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestGastrointestinal tract bleeding14 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestCentral nervous system bleeding2 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestOther hemorrhage24 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Superficial edema76 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Pleural effusion87 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestFluid retention: Other52 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestDiarrhea229 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs) of Special InterestRash72 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Drug-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug

Time frame: Continuously throughout study to <=30 days after last dose of study drug; included AEs with an onset date >= day 1 and <= last dose date + 30 days

Population: All participants who received treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll deaths505 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDeaths within 30 days of end of treatment50 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDrug-related SAEs90 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll Drug-related AEs482 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDrug-related AEs leading to discontinuation76 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll SAEs317 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDrug-related SAEs150 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll deaths506 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDrug-related AEs leading to discontinuation144 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsDeaths within 30 days of end of treatment79 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll SAEs381 Participants
DasatinibNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related AEs, Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All DeathsAll Drug-related AEs553 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026