Skip to content

Conservative Versus Aggressive Revascularization in Patients With Intermediate Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Angiography Guidance Alone

Conservative Versus Aggressive Revascularization in Patients With Intermediate Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Angiography Guidance Alone (SMART-CASE)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00743899
Acronym
SMART-CASE
Enrollment
899
Registered
2008-08-29
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2013-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, Everolimus-eluting stent

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare conservative versus aggressive strategy in patients with intermediate lesions with angiography guidance alone.

Detailed description

To investigate whether conservative revascularization using criteria of 70% diameter stenosis would be non-inferior to aggressive revascularization using criteria of 50% diameter stenosis in coronary intermediate lesions, we conducted the Conservative Revascularization versus Aggressive Revascularization for Coronary Stenting with Everolimus-Eluting Stents (SMART-CASE) trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe aggressive group

Stents were implanted in lesions with diameter stenosis \>50% and RD ≥2.25 mm and balloon angioplasty was performed in lesions with diameter stenosis \>50% and RD ≥2.0 mm and \<2.25 mm.

PROCEDUREThe conservative group

Stenting was performed only in lesions with diameter stenosis \>70% and reference diameter (RD) ≥2.25 mm

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Intermediate coronary lesion(s) (diameter stenosis between 50% and 70% by quantitative coronary analysis) * Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥2.25 mm and ≤4.25 mm

Exclusion criteria

* cardiogenic shock * myocardial infarction (MI) within 48 hours * left main lesion * drug-eluting stent implantation in the target vessel prior to enrollment * ≥2 chronic total occlusions in major coronary territories * history of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy * gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within 3 months or major surgery within 2 months * platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 * planned elective surgical procedure that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridine during the first 6 months after enrollment * non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A composite of all cause death, MI, or any revascularization1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cardiac death1 years
Myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q wave)1 years
Any revascularization1 years
All cause Death1 years
Revascularization of target intermediate lesion1 years
Target vessel failure1 years
Stent thrombosis1 years

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026