Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
Paranoid Schizophrenia, Paranoid Delusions, CBT, D-Cycloserine
Brief summary
This study will examine whether pretreatment with D-cycloserine before cognitive behavioral therapy can reduce impairments still present in people with stable cases of schizophrenia as well as determine which traits make schizophrenics most likely to respond to D-cycloserine treatment.
Detailed description
Schizophrenia is a debilitating chronic condition that affects approximately 1 % of Americans, who experience symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and disorders of thought and movement. These symptoms are described as positive symptoms, because they are experienced in addition to what healthy individuals experience. Negative symptoms, which are reductions in normal functioning, and cognitive deficits, which are problems in thinking, also plague people with schizophrenia. The negative symptoms and cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia are produced in otherwise healthy people by neurotransmitters inhibiting the glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate NMDA receptors in the brain. This inhibition of NMDA receptors also causes intensification of psychotic symptoms in otherwise stabilized schizophrenic patients. The drug D-cycloserine partially excites NMDA receptors, and it has been used to help patients with anxiety disorders to overcome phobias while they are receiving cognitive behavioral therapy. This study will examine whether D-cycloserine can increase the cognitive flexibility of someone undergoing CBT and thereby enhance the therapy's ability to reduce a patient's belief in paranoid delusions, preoccupation with delusions, and related distress. All participants will be screened to ensure proper diagnosis of schizophrenia without other conditions. Those who pass will be randomly assigned to receive either D-cycloserine first or a placebo pill first. One week after the screening, participants in the D-cycloserine group will be given the drug before a 1-hour session of simulated CBT treatment. Those in the placebo condition will receive a placebo pill before an identical session. Two weeks after the screening, both groups will be called back for another session of CBT, but the pills they receive will be switched. Those who received D-cycloserine the first week will receive placebo, and those who received placebo will receive D-cycloserine. The CBT sessions will attempt to increase cognitive flexibility in patients by asking them to provide alternate explanations for common situations. At screening, at the start of visits on the first and second weeks, and at a follow-up visit on the third week, participants will undergo a series of assessments, including interviews, computerized tests, and self-report measures. Belief in, preoccupation with, and distress caused by delusions, as well as degree of cognitive flexibility, will be assessed.
Interventions
Single, fixed 50-mg dose of D-cycloserine administered 1 hour prior to a CBT session
One-hour talk therapy session with a trained clinician aimed at increasing cognitive flexibility by examining alternative explanations to everyday situations
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Meets DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophrenia, paranoid subtype, based on chart review, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and consultation with the patient's clinicians * Medicated with an antipsychotic agent other than clozapine at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks * Scores at least 3, or moderate, on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms global delusion rating * Paranoid or referential delusional content * Never engaged in formal CBT psychotherapy in the past
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of a comorbid Axis I disorder other than schizophrenia * Active substance abuse or dependence within 6 months * Significant suicidal ideation within 6 weeks * Pregnant or nursing * Unstable medical disorder * impaired renal clearance (creatinine \<60mg/dL/min) * Suffering from dementia * Suffering from seizure disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Alternative Beliefs Assessment | Baseline to Week 2 | Number of alternative beliefs generated on the Alternative Beliefs Assessment. This assessment used nine vignettes describing social interactions: three of neutral content, three negatively-valanced, and three tailored to the patient's specific delusions. Participants were asked to generate as many explanations (alternative beliefs) as they could for each scenario, and the number of explanations produced in response to each item was recorded. Scores could range from 0 to as many explanations a person could produce (no maximum value). The total score was calculated by adding all alternative beliefs generated from each vignette. A higher number of alternative beliefs generated reflects a greater degree of cognitive flexibility. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale | Baseline to Week 2 | This scale is a one-question item added on to the Bead Task. The one item asks for a certainty rating, from 1-3. Higher scores represent better outcomes. |
| Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score | Baseline to Week 2 | The Delusions subscale is a 6 item clinician administered scale, with Likert items 0-4 and range is 0-24. Higher scores represent worse outcomes |
| Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Baseline to Week 2 | The BCIS is a 15-item self-report scale with Likert items 0-3. It consists of a composite score, where higher scores represent better outcomes, and there are 2 subscales: 1) Self-Reflectiveness (higher scores represent better outcomes) and 2) Self-Certainty (higher scores represent worse outcomes). The total score for each scale is the sum of the item scores that comprise it (see below). The BCIS composite index is calculated as self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty. Step 1. Score every item on the BCIS from 0 to 3 according to the following rule: Do Not Agree at All = 0, Agree Slightly = 1, Agree a Lot = 2, Agree Completely = 3 Step 2. Calculate self-reflectiveness subscale: sum items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 15. Step 3. Calculate self-certainty subscale: sum items 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13. Step 4. Calculate BCIS composite index: self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty. |
| Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning | Baseline to Week 2 | The Bead task is a reasoning task, where the number of beads guessed is the numeric value represented in the data. The lower end range is 1, and there is no upper range limit. Higher scores represent better outcomes. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited from an urban community mental health center in Boston, MA from September 2006 to May 2010.
Pre-assignment details
31 participants were screened, 10 were excluded (7 did not meet inclusion criteria and 2 refused to participate, 1 excluded for reasons not listed in study publication)
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 1 D-cycloserine, Then Placebo Participants received 50 mg D-cycloserine 1 hour before a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) session on Week 1, and then received placebo 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 2. | 11 |
| 2 Placebo, Then D-cycloserine Participants received placebo 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 1, and then received 50 mg D-cycloserine 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 2. | 9 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 1 D-cycloserine, Then Placebo | Total | 2 Placebo, Then D-cycloserine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 50.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 | 51.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 11 participants | 20 participants | 9 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 11 | 0 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 11 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Change in Alternative Beliefs Assessment
Number of alternative beliefs generated on the Alternative Beliefs Assessment. This assessment used nine vignettes describing social interactions: three of neutral content, three negatively-valanced, and three tailored to the patient's specific delusions. Participants were asked to generate as many explanations (alternative beliefs) as they could for each scenario, and the number of explanations produced in response to each item was recorded. Scores could range from 0 to as many explanations a person could produce (no maximum value). The total score was calculated by adding all alternative beliefs generated from each vignette. A higher number of alternative beliefs generated reflects a greater degree of cognitive flexibility.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-cycloserine | Change in Alternative Beliefs Assessment | 14.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.71 |
| Placebo | Change in Alternative Beliefs Assessment | 10.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.08 |
Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning
The Bead task is a reasoning task, where the number of beads guessed is the numeric value represented in the data. The lower end range is 1, and there is no upper range limit. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-cycloserine | Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning | 0.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.47 |
| Placebo | Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning | 0.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.16 |
Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)
The BCIS is a 15-item self-report scale with Likert items 0-3. It consists of a composite score, where higher scores represent better outcomes, and there are 2 subscales: 1) Self-Reflectiveness (higher scores represent better outcomes) and 2) Self-Certainty (higher scores represent worse outcomes). The total score for each scale is the sum of the item scores that comprise it (see below). The BCIS composite index is calculated as self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty. Step 1. Score every item on the BCIS from 0 to 3 according to the following rule: Do Not Agree at All = 0, Agree Slightly = 1, Agree a Lot = 2, Agree Completely = 3 Step 2. Calculate self-reflectiveness subscale: sum items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 15. Step 3. Calculate self-certainty subscale: sum items 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13. Step 4. Calculate BCIS composite index: self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D-cycloserine | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Composite Score | -0.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.46 |
| D-cycloserine | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Self-Certainty Score | 0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.68 |
| D-cycloserine | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Self-Reflectiveness Score | -0.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| Placebo | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Composite Score | 0.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.16 |
| Placebo | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Self-Certainty Score | -0.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Placebo | Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS) | Self-Reflectiveness Score | -0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.23 |
Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score
The Delusions subscale is a 6 item clinician administered scale, with Likert items 0-4 and range is 0-24. Higher scores represent worse outcomes
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-cycloserine | Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score | -0.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Placebo | Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score | -0.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale
This scale is a one-question item added on to the Bead Task. The one item asks for a certainty rating, from 1-3. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-cycloserine | Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale | 0.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Placebo | Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale | -0.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |