Skip to content

Using D-cycloserine to Enhance the Benefits of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Schizophrenia

Pilot Study of Pretreatment D-cycloserine for CBT-assessment of Paranoid Delusions in Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00742079
Enrollment
21
Registered
2008-08-27
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Paranoid Delusions, CBT, D-Cycloserine

Brief summary

This study will examine whether pretreatment with D-cycloserine before cognitive behavioral therapy can reduce impairments still present in people with stable cases of schizophrenia as well as determine which traits make schizophrenics most likely to respond to D-cycloserine treatment.

Detailed description

Schizophrenia is a debilitating chronic condition that affects approximately 1 % of Americans, who experience symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and disorders of thought and movement. These symptoms are described as positive symptoms, because they are experienced in addition to what healthy individuals experience. Negative symptoms, which are reductions in normal functioning, and cognitive deficits, which are problems in thinking, also plague people with schizophrenia. The negative symptoms and cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia are produced in otherwise healthy people by neurotransmitters inhibiting the glutamatergic N-methyl-d-aspartate NMDA receptors in the brain. This inhibition of NMDA receptors also causes intensification of psychotic symptoms in otherwise stabilized schizophrenic patients. The drug D-cycloserine partially excites NMDA receptors, and it has been used to help patients with anxiety disorders to overcome phobias while they are receiving cognitive behavioral therapy. This study will examine whether D-cycloserine can increase the cognitive flexibility of someone undergoing CBT and thereby enhance the therapy's ability to reduce a patient's belief in paranoid delusions, preoccupation with delusions, and related distress. All participants will be screened to ensure proper diagnosis of schizophrenia without other conditions. Those who pass will be randomly assigned to receive either D-cycloserine first or a placebo pill first. One week after the screening, participants in the D-cycloserine group will be given the drug before a 1-hour session of simulated CBT treatment. Those in the placebo condition will receive a placebo pill before an identical session. Two weeks after the screening, both groups will be called back for another session of CBT, but the pills they receive will be switched. Those who received D-cycloserine the first week will receive placebo, and those who received placebo will receive D-cycloserine. The CBT sessions will attempt to increase cognitive flexibility in patients by asking them to provide alternate explanations for common situations. At screening, at the start of visits on the first and second weeks, and at a follow-up visit on the third week, participants will undergo a series of assessments, including interviews, computerized tests, and self-report measures. Belief in, preoccupation with, and distress caused by delusions, as well as degree of cognitive flexibility, will be assessed.

Interventions

DRUGD-cycloserine

Single, fixed 50-mg dose of D-cycloserine administered 1 hour prior to a CBT session

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy

One-hour talk therapy session with a trained clinician aimed at increasing cognitive flexibility by examining alternative explanations to everyday situations

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meets DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophrenia, paranoid subtype, based on chart review, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, and consultation with the patient's clinicians * Medicated with an antipsychotic agent other than clozapine at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks * Scores at least 3, or moderate, on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms global delusion rating * Paranoid or referential delusional content * Never engaged in formal CBT psychotherapy in the past

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of a comorbid Axis I disorder other than schizophrenia * Active substance abuse or dependence within 6 months * Significant suicidal ideation within 6 weeks * Pregnant or nursing * Unstable medical disorder * impaired renal clearance (creatinine \<60mg/dL/min) * Suffering from dementia * Suffering from seizure disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Alternative Beliefs AssessmentBaseline to Week 2Number of alternative beliefs generated on the Alternative Beliefs Assessment. This assessment used nine vignettes describing social interactions: three of neutral content, three negatively-valanced, and three tailored to the patient's specific delusions. Participants were asked to generate as many explanations (alternative beliefs) as they could for each scenario, and the number of explanations produced in response to each item was recorded. Scores could range from 0 to as many explanations a person could produce (no maximum value). The total score was calculated by adding all alternative beliefs generated from each vignette. A higher number of alternative beliefs generated reflects a greater degree of cognitive flexibility.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions ScaleBaseline to Week 2This scale is a one-question item added on to the Bead Task. The one item asks for a certainty rating, from 1-3. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion ScoreBaseline to Week 2The Delusions subscale is a 6 item clinician administered scale, with Likert items 0-4 and range is 0-24. Higher scores represent worse outcomes
Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Baseline to Week 2The BCIS is a 15-item self-report scale with Likert items 0-3. It consists of a composite score, where higher scores represent better outcomes, and there are 2 subscales: 1) Self-Reflectiveness (higher scores represent better outcomes) and 2) Self-Certainty (higher scores represent worse outcomes). The total score for each scale is the sum of the item scores that comprise it (see below). The BCIS composite index is calculated as self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty. Step 1. Score every item on the BCIS from 0 to 3 according to the following rule: Do Not Agree at All = 0, Agree Slightly = 1, Agree a Lot = 2, Agree Completely = 3 Step 2. Calculate self-reflectiveness subscale: sum items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 15. Step 3. Calculate self-certainty subscale: sum items 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13. Step 4. Calculate BCIS composite index: self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty.
Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic ReasoningBaseline to Week 2The Bead task is a reasoning task, where the number of beads guessed is the numeric value represented in the data. The lower end range is 1, and there is no upper range limit. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from an urban community mental health center in Boston, MA from September 2006 to May 2010.

Pre-assignment details

31 participants were screened, 10 were excluded (7 did not meet inclusion criteria and 2 refused to participate, 1 excluded for reasons not listed in study publication)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 D-cycloserine, Then Placebo
Participants received 50 mg D-cycloserine 1 hour before a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) session on Week 1, and then received placebo 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 2.
11
2 Placebo, Then D-cycloserine
Participants received placebo 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 1, and then received 50 mg D-cycloserine 1 hour before a CBT session on Week 2.
9
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 D-cycloserine, Then PlaceboTotal2 Placebo, Then D-cycloserine
Age, Continuous49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
50.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants20 participants9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Alternative Beliefs Assessment

Number of alternative beliefs generated on the Alternative Beliefs Assessment. This assessment used nine vignettes describing social interactions: three of neutral content, three negatively-valanced, and three tailored to the patient's specific delusions. Participants were asked to generate as many explanations (alternative beliefs) as they could for each scenario, and the number of explanations produced in response to each item was recorded. Scores could range from 0 to as many explanations a person could produce (no maximum value). The total score was calculated by adding all alternative beliefs generated from each vignette. A higher number of alternative beliefs generated reflects a greater degree of cognitive flexibility.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineChange in Alternative Beliefs Assessment14.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.71
PlaceboChange in Alternative Beliefs Assessment10.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.08
Secondary

Change in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning

The Bead task is a reasoning task, where the number of beads guessed is the numeric value represented in the data. The lower end range is 1, and there is no upper range limit. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineChange in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning0.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.47
PlaceboChange in Bead Task Score Measuring Probabilistic Reasoning0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Secondary

Change in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)

The BCIS is a 15-item self-report scale with Likert items 0-3. It consists of a composite score, where higher scores represent better outcomes, and there are 2 subscales: 1) Self-Reflectiveness (higher scores represent better outcomes) and 2) Self-Certainty (higher scores represent worse outcomes). The total score for each scale is the sum of the item scores that comprise it (see below). The BCIS composite index is calculated as self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty. Step 1. Score every item on the BCIS from 0 to 3 according to the following rule: Do Not Agree at All = 0, Agree Slightly = 1, Agree a Lot = 2, Agree Completely = 3 Step 2. Calculate self-reflectiveness subscale: sum items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 15. Step 3. Calculate self-certainty subscale: sum items 2, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13. Step 4. Calculate BCIS composite index: self-reflectiveness minus self-certainty.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Composite Score-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
D-cycloserineChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Self-Certainty Score0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.68
D-cycloserineChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Self-Reflectiveness Score-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
PlaceboChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Composite Score0.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.16
PlaceboChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Self-Certainty Score-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
PlaceboChange in Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)Self-Reflectiveness Score-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.23
Secondary

Change in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score

The Delusions subscale is a 6 item clinician administered scale, with Likert items 0-4 and range is 0-24. Higher scores represent worse outcomes

Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineChange in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score-0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
PlaceboChange in Psychotic Rating Scales (PSYRATS) Delusion Score-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Secondary

Change in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale

This scale is a one-question item added on to the Bead Task. The one item asks for a certainty rating, from 1-3. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
D-cycloserineChange in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange in the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Scale-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026