Skip to content

Heart Rate Variability Modulation Following a Manipulation in Pain Free Patients Versus Patients in Pain

Heart Rate Variability Modulation Following a Manipulation in Pain Free Patients Versus Patients in Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00740558
Enrollment
53
Registered
2008-08-25
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2006-07-31
Last updated
2008-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

HRV, Activator, Chiropractic, VLF, HF, LF, LF/HF

Brief summary

Background The purpose of this study was to examine the heart rate variability (HRV) in the presence or the absence of pain in the lower back (L5), while receiving chiropractic care. Methods A total of 53 healthy participants were randomly assigned to a control, 2 treatment or 2 sham groups (n = 10 per group). Participants underwent an eight-minute acclimatizing period. The HRV tachygram (RR interval) data were recorded directly into a Suunto watch (model T6). The investigators analyzed the five minute pre-treatment and post treatments intervals. The spectral analysis of the tachygram was performed with the Kubios Software (University of Kuopio, Finland).

Detailed description

Background The chiropractic profession has in the past utilized research results from other fields of and extrapolated them into their science and clinical interpretation 1-4. More recently, chiropractic researchers looked into autonomic nervous system (ANS) adaptations in an animal model following a mechanical stress to the spinal column 5, a noxious mechanical stimulation 6 or a spinal manipulation 7. In the human model, several investigations have been done to measure modifications of the heart rate variability (HRV) following cervical 8 and thoracic manipulations 9 or in a multisite clinical study 10 where details of the manipulation site were not provided. The site of interest for the chiropractic intervention was defined at the level of the lumbar spine, left and right L-5. This site was selected because most studies 8-10 measuring HRV have used the cervical or thoracic component of the spine. The effect of the lumbar parasympathetic nervous system has not been evaluated. In these studies 8-10, changes were observed in various HRV variables, while in two of those studies 8, 9, where sham groups were included, the sham conditions did not demonstrate any changes in the reported HRV parameters. There are strong indications that HRV is a good marker of ANS activity 19-24. Thus, in the three above mentioned studies, it appears that chiropractic interventions have an effect on the ANS. At present, however, no studies to evaluate whether a lumbar spinal manipulation would produce a change in the HRV have been reported. Thus, the present study seeks to measure the effect of a lumbar adjustment, with a manually assisted mechanical force, producing a chiropractic adjustment, in participants without lumbar pain and a traditional adjustment in participants with lumbar pain on HRV. The hypothesis being that a lumbar intervention would have an acute effect on the ANS as demonstrated by the modulation of HRV variables.

Interventions

PROCEDUREActivator methods technique

Chiropractic adjustment by a manually assisted mechanical force

PROCEDURETraditional chiropractic adjustment

Lumbar roll according to the Diversified technique of chiropractic adjusting

Sponsors

Université du Québec a Montréal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Acute low back pain (pain group) * Maintenance care for the pain free group and the control group

Exclusion criteria

* For the control group (pain) * For the non pain group pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean R-R interval, the number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms, and the proportion of NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms the very low frequency, the low frequency, the high frequency, the LF/HF ratioPre and post measurements of one intervention

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026