Non-invasive Blood Pressure (BP) Monitoring Compared to A-Line BP Monitoring

Accuracy and Precision of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Arm, Calf and Thighs of Medical ICU Patients When Compared to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00739700

Acronym

NIBP vs IABP

Enrollment

116

Registered

2008-08-22

Start date

2007-06-30

Completion date

2016-12-31

Last updated

2017-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Pressure

Keywords

hemodynamics, blood pressure, blood pressure monitors

Brief summary

Blood pressure cuffs (NIBP) are slowly replacing intra-arterial (IABP) measurement as the standard of care in the medical intensive care unit. There is little data to support this clinical normalization of deviance. This study aims to correlate NIBP with IABP.

Detailed description

It has become standard practice in inpatient and intensive care settings to monitor systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure by oscillometric technique. Several studies have confirmed the accuracy and precision of the oscillometric technique in ambulatory patients at both the level of the brachial and radial arteries. Multiple clinical research studies have demonstrated that when blood pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures) determined by non-invasive blood pressure monitors (NIBP) from various manufacturers are compared to direct invasive arterial pressure monitors, the two values are on average within 5 mm Hg of each other. There is limited data in critically ill patients. To date, there are no studies evaluating the accuracy or precision of these devices in intensive care patients for alternative sites (calf, thigh). In addition, there are no large clinical studies evaluating oscillometric NIBP monitoring in a complex medical intensive care population with varying hemodynamics. The goal of this study is to validate the oscillometric technique in measurement of blood pressure in the calf and thigh regions when compared to a gold standard. We may also be able to evaluate more specifically which situations for our patient population the blood pressure will be accurately portrayed as compared with the arterial pressure tracing. It has possible clinical value in either validating non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and eliminating/decreasing the need for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Our hypothesis is that NIBP in the medical intensive care patients is highly variable and not a reliable means of arterial blood pressure monitoring.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Arterial blood pressure line

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of arms and legs for cuff pressures * Medical or surgical indication that might prevent use of blood pressure cuffs

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Correlation between NIBP and IABP. NIBP is measured in both upper arms, both wrists, both thighs, and both ankles.	All NIBP's are measured within 10 minutes.

Countries

United States

Outcome results