Skip to content

A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00739284
Acronym
JJVsPCN08
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-08-21
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2008-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Disease

Keywords

preferred, procedure, drainage, obstructed, kidney, stone

Brief summary

Kidney obstruction might be caused by a stone in the urinary tract. In case of accompanying fever or renal failure, an urgent drainage might be needed. This can be done either by placing an ureteral stent or a nephrotomy tube. Only limited number of studies examined the question which of the two is preferred. A debate exist regarding the effectiveness of each procedure to improve symptoms, renal function and treating an infection. Our goal is to resolve this debate and to state whether one way is preferred on the other.

Interventions

DEVICEnephrostomy tube and ureteral stent

Sponsors

Rabin Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient suffering from obstructed kidney by a stone and at least one of these situations: 1. fever (above 38c) 2. A rise in creatine to above 1.5 3. Pain resistent to multiple analgetic treatments

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with medical condition that prevent the use of one of the procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
quality of life

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactShay Golan, MD
shayg@clalit.org.il972-3-9376560

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026