Skip to content

Study of Vardenafil in Patients Suffering From Erectile Dysfunction and Metabolic Syndrome

Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized Study of Vardenafil to Determine Efficacy on Erectile Dysfunction (ED) in Men With ED and Metabolic Syndrome (ED-METABOLIC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00738400
Enrollment
150
Registered
2008-08-20
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2015-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction, Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

Vardenafil, Erectile Dysfunction, Double-blind study

Brief summary

This is a controlled, randomized, multi-center prospective study of vardenafil to determine efficacy on Erectile Dysfunction (ED), tolerability and safety in men with ED and Metabolic Syndrome. This study will explore the rate of patients who do need to switch to the highest dosage based upon the expectation that most men can stay on vardenafil 10 mg PRN (pro re nata)

Interventions

Vardenafil 10 mg tablets daily for 4 weeks, vardenafil 5 mg / 10 mg / 20 mg tablets for consecutive 4 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo tablets daily for 4 weeks, placebo tablets daily for consecutive 4 weeks

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable heterosexual relationship * History of erectile dysfunction for at least 6 months * IIEF- EF Domain entry score (at Visit 2): \>21 points * Documented metabolic syndrome according to the IDF (International Diabetes Foundation) * Subjects motivated for erectile dysfunction treatment * Documented, dated, written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Any underlying cardiovascular condition * History of myocardial infarction * Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation * Resting hypotension * Postural hypotension within 6 months of Visit 1 * History of congenital QT prolongation * Bleeding disorder * History of prostatectomy because of prostate cancer * Hereditary degenerative retinal disorders * History of loss of vision because of NAION (non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy) * 29 Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Subscore at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)baseline and up to 8 weeks or LOCFThe primary variable was the least square (LS)-mean difference between treatment groups in the IIEF-EF domain score (6-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: 6-10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; 26-30 'no erectile dysfunction \[ED\]'). The target variable is the LS-mean difference between treatment groups at endpoint. The LS-means of both treatment groups are derived from a baseline-adjusted endpoint measure (week 8/last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]) as calculated via an ANCOVA.
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 2) at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeksPercent successful penetrations were calculated per participant as the number of successful sexual attempts (penetrations) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful penetrations was then calculated across all participants.
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance (SEP3: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3) at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeksPercent successful maintenance of erection were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (maintenance of erection) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful maintenance of erection was then calculated across all participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Function at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)up to 8 weeks or LOCFResponders: percentage of participants achieving an IIEF-EF score \>25.(IIEF-EF domain score: 6-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: 6-10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; 26-30 'no ED')
Number of Participants Who Can Stay on the Initially Provided Dosage of Vardenafil (10 mg PRN (Pro re Nata))week 4 and week 8Number of participants with no recorded titration of Vardenafil after visit 3.
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection (SEP1) at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeksPercent successful erections were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (achievement of erection) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful erections was then calculated across all participants.
Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate (SEP6) at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeksPercent successful ejaculations were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (achievement of ejaculation) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful ejaculations was then calculated across all participants.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)
Vardenafil 10 mg tablets PRN (pro re nata) for 4 weeks, Vardenafil 5 mg/10 mg/20 mg tablets PRN for consecutive 4 weeks
75
Placebo
Matching placebo tablets PRN (pro re nata) for 4 weeks, placebo tablets PRN for consecutive 4 weeks
72
Total147

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyNon-compliant with study medication01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
56.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
BMI (body mass index)30.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
30.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
30.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
75 Participants72 Participants147 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 758 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 750 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Subscore at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The primary variable was the least square (LS)-mean difference between treatment groups in the IIEF-EF domain score (6-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: 6-10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; 26-30 'no erectile dysfunction \[ED\]'). The target variable is the LS-mean difference between treatment groups at endpoint. The LS-means of both treatment groups are derived from a baseline-adjusted endpoint measure (week 8/last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]) as calculated via an ANCOVA.

Time frame: baseline and up to 8 weeks or LOCF

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Subscore at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)20.96 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Subscore at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)14.20 Scores on a scale
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline covariate, endpoint week 8 or LOCF. Factors: treatment, pooled centers. Ls mean at endpointp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-9.03, -4.49]ANCOVA
Primary

Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance (SEP3: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3) at Week 8

Percent successful maintenance of erection were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (maintenance of erection) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful maintenance of erection was then calculated across all participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance (SEP3: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3) at Week 853.15 Percent erection maintenance
PlaceboChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Erection Maintenance (SEP3: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3) at Week 827.00 Percent erection maintenance
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline covariate, endpoint week 8 or LOCF. Factors: treatment, pooled centers. Ls mean at endpointp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-37.48, -14.83]ANCOVA
Primary

Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 2) at Week 8

Percent successful penetrations were calculated per participant as the number of successful sexual attempts (penetrations) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful penetrations was then calculated across all participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Change in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 2) at Week 873.50 Percent successful penetrations
PlaceboChange in Percentage From Baseline in Success of Penetration (SEP2: Sexual Encounter Profile Question 2) at Week 852.79 Percent successful penetrations
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline covariate, endpoint week 8 or LOCF. Factors: treatment, pooled centers. Ls mean at endpointp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-30.66, -10.76]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate (SEP6) at Week 8

Percent successful ejaculations were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (achievement of ejaculation) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful ejaculations was then calculated across all participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate (SEP6) at Week 871.29 Percent successful ejaculations
PlaceboChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Ejaculate (SEP6) at Week 843.96 Percent successful ejaculations
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline covariate, endpoint week 8 or LOCF. Factors: treatment, pooled centers. Ls mean at endpointp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-37.24, -17.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection (SEP1) at Week 8

Percent successful erections were calculated per participant as the number of successful attempts (achievement of erection) divided by the total number of attempts. The mean percent successful erections was then calculated across all participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Change in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection (SEP1) at Week 891.36 Percent successful erections
PlaceboChange in Percentage From Baseline in Ability to Obtain an Erection (SEP1) at Week 875.79 Percent successful erections
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline covariate, endpoint week 8 or LOCF. Factors: treatment, pooled centers. Ls mean at endpointp-value: 0.000395% CI: [-23.8, -7.34]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Can Stay on the Initially Provided Dosage of Vardenafil (10 mg PRN (Pro re Nata))

Number of participants with no recorded titration of Vardenafil after visit 3.

Time frame: week 4 and week 8

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Number of Participants Who Can Stay on the Initially Provided Dosage of Vardenafil (10 mg PRN (Pro re Nata))28 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Can Stay on the Initially Provided Dosage of Vardenafil (10 mg PRN (Pro re Nata))13 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Function at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Responders: percentage of participants achieving an IIEF-EF score \>25.(IIEF-EF domain score: 6-30 ordinal points, specifying the severity of erectile dysfunction: 6-10 'severe'; 11-16 'moderate'; 17-21 'mild to moderate'; 22-25 'mild'; 26-30 'no ED')

Time frame: up to 8 weeks or LOCF

Population: Number of participants analyzed differs due to missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vardenafil (Levitra, BAY38-9456)Percentage of Participants Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Function at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)35 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Back to Normal Erectile Function at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)10 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Mantel-Haenszel Testp-value: 0.0004Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026