Skip to content

A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Patients With Mantle Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib or Are Refractory to Bortezomib. The EMERGE Trial

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study To Determine The Efficacy And Safety Of Single-Agent Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) In Patients With Mantel Cell NHL Who Have Relapsed Or Progressed After Treatment With Bortezomib Or Are Refractory To Bortezomib

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00737529
Acronym
EMERGE
Enrollment
134
Registered
2008-08-19
Start date
2008-12-22
Completion date
2017-11-08
Last updated
2018-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, CC-5013, Revlimid, Lenalidomide

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide (Revlimid (R)) in subjects with mantle cell lymphoma who have relapsed, progressed or are refractory to bortezomib.

Detailed description

Follow up phase will continue until either 100% of the patients have died, are lost to follow up or have withdrawn consent or a maximum of 4 years from the last patient enrolled, whichever comes first. All other efficacy and safety endpoints will be updated at this time. In the unlikely event that the study will be closed and patients are still responding to treatment at this time, Celgene will discuss with the treating physicians options to provide further treatment to the patient after study closure in line with local regulation. Follow up for second primary malignancies and OS will continue until 100% of the patients have died, are lost to follow up, have withdrawn consent, or a maximum of 5 years from the last patient enrolled, whichever comes first. 10 October 2017: In regard to the last subject last visit date/study completion date, the prolongation of timelines is due to the bridging of a treatment gap for a patient responding to study medication until non-study medication is available.

Interventions

DRUGlenalidomide

25mg oral capsules continuous days 1-21 each of a 28 day cycle

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven mantle cell lymphoma * Patients must have documents relapsed, refractory or PD after treatment with bortezomib * Must have measureable disease on cross sectional imaging by CT * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0,1 or 2 * Willing to follow pregnancy precautions

Exclusion criteria

* Any of the following laboratory abnormalities * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1,500 cells/mm3 (1.5 x 109/L) * Platelet count \< 60,000/mm3 (60 x 109/L) * Serum aspartate transaminase/Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase(AST/SGOT) or alanine transaminase/Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) \> 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN), except in patients with documented liver involvement by lymphoma. * Serum total bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN, except in cases of Gilbert's Syndrome and documented liver involvement by lymphoma. * Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) of \< 30 mL /min * Patients who are candidates for high dose chemotherapy/allogeneic stem cell transplant are not eligible * History of active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma within the previous 3 months * Subjects not willing or unable to take deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis * Prior history of malignancies, other than MCL, unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 3 years * Positive Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active Hepatitis B or C

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses.
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.Kaplan Meier estimate for the duration of response (DoR) was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of initial response for responders (demonstrating evidence of at least a PR) to the date of first documented disease progression (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death (without documented progression) for participants who responded; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of disease progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 monthsKaplan Meier estimates of PFS was defined as the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last adequate assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last adequate tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment.
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression (TTP) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 monthsKaplan Meier estimate of time to progression was calculated as time from the start of the study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression. Participants who died without progression were censored at the date of death; otherwise, the censoring rules presented above for PFS applied to the analysis of TTP. Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion or increase by ≥50% from previously involved sites from nadir
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of treatment failure; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 daysTime to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated from the start of study drug therapy to early discontinuation from treatment due to any cause, including disease progression, toxicity, or death and was based on site-reported data.
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) /Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 daysThe percentage of participants whose best response was CR or CRu. Participants who had discontinued before CR/CRu was observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before a CR/CRu response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow.
Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to first documented CR/CRu or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 daysTime to Complete Response (CR+CRu) was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of the first occurrence of at least CRu and was calculated only for participants with CR or CRu.
Overall Survival (OS)From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of progressive disease or death; up to the final data cut-off date of 30 March 2017; median duration of follow-up for surviving participants was 62.94 monthsKaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was calculated from the time the first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From the first dose of lenalidomide through 28 days after the last dose during the follow-up phase; median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 94.0 (1.0, 1950 days)Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug.
Time to Response (TTR)From Day 1 of study drug to time of first documented PR or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 daysTime to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants.
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Complete Response (DoCR) (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review CommitteeFrom Day 1 of study drug to progression or early discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 monthsKaplan Meier estimates for the duration of CR/CRu was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of CR/CRu to the date of documented disease progression or death (without documented progression) for participants who obtained a CR/CRu; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Colombia, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled and treated at 42 centers in 12 countries: US/ Puerto Rico, France, Israel, Belgium, Spain, Turkey, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Colombia, Germany, and Singapore.

Pre-assignment details

All participants were required to have local histologic confirmation of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) for entry into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lenalidomide
Participants received lenalidomide 10 mg or 25 mg oral capsules on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle and was dependent on renal function; Participants with normal renal function (defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl)) of ≥ 60 mL/min) received 25 mg of lenalidomide by mouth (PO) daily, and those with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl) ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min) were started at a 10 mg daily dose. Participants could continue to receive treatment until disease progression, development of unacceptable adverse events (AEs), or voluntary withdrawal.
134
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event24
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyDisease Progression95
Overall StudyOther4
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLenalidomide
Age, Continuous67.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.38
Age, Customized
<65
49 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65
85 Participants
Bulky Disease
Missing
2 Participants
Bulky Disease
No
88 Participants
Bulky Disease
Yes
44 Participants
Duration of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
<3 years
52 years
Duration of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
≥ 3 years
82 years
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 = (Fully Active)
43 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 = (Restrictive but ambulatory)
73 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 = (Ambulatory but unable to work)
17 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
3 = (Limited self care)
1 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
4 = (Completely Disabled)
0 Participants
MCL (Ann Arbor) Stage at Diagnosis
I
2 Participants
MCL (Ann Arbor) Stage at Diagnosis
II
5 Participants
MCL (Ann Arbor) Stage at Diagnosis
III
19 Participants
MCL (Ann Arbor) Stage at Diagnosis
IV
105 Participants
MCL (Ann Arbor) Stage at Diagnosis
Missing
3 Participants
MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) Score Group at Enrollment
High
39 Participants
MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) Score Group at Enrollment
Intermediate
51 Participants
MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) Score Group at Enrollment
Low
39 Participants
MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) Score Group at Enrollment
Missing
5 Participants
Prior Bone Marrow Assessment
Indeterminate
8 Participants
Prior Bone Marrow Assessment
Missing
19 Participants
Prior Bone Marrow Assessment
Negative
52 Participants
Prior Bone Marrow Assessment
Positive
55 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
128 Participants
Renal function at baseline
Missing
6 Participants
Renal function at baseline
Moderate Renal Insufficiency (CrCl ≥ 30 and < 60mL
28 Participants
Renal function at baseline
Normal (CrCl > = 60 mL/min)
99 Participants
Renal function at baseline
Severe Renal Insufficiency (CrCl < 30 mL/min)
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
108 Participants
Tumor Burden
High = having 1 lesion ≥ 5 cm or 3 lesions ≥ 3cm
78 Participants
Tumor Burden
Low = < 5cm lesions
54 Participants
Tumor Burden
Missing = unable to characterize
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
106 / 134
other
Total, other adverse events
125 / 134
serious
Total, serious adverse events
70 / 134

Outcome results

Primary

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimate for the duration of response (DoR) was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of initial response for responders (demonstrating evidence of at least a PR) to the date of first documented disease progression (any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir) or death (without documented progression) for participants who responded; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

Population: Includes participants from the ITT population who achieved a PR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR) According to the Independent Review Committee16.64 months
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants whose best response was Complete Response, Complete Response unconfirmed or Partial Response. Participants who had discontinued before any response has been observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. Tumor Response was assessed by a modification of the International Lymphoma Workshop Response Criteria, IWRC, Cheson, 1999); CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow; PR = is defined ≥50% decrease in 6 largest nodes or nodal masses.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study treatment to progession or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days.

Population: ITT population defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomidePercentage of Participants Who Achieved an Overall Response According to the Independent Review Committee (IRC)29.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Complete Response (DoCR) (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimates for the duration of CR/CRu was calculated from the date of the first occurrence of CR/CRu to the date of documented disease progression or death (without documented progression) for participants who obtained a CR/CRu; participants who had not progressed (or died) were censored at the last valid assessment.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Population: Includes participants from the ITT population who achieved a CRu or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Complete Response (DoCR) (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee24.43 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS was defined as the start of study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. If a participant had not progressed or died, PFS was censored at the time of last adequate assessment when the participant was known not to have progressed. For participants who received other anti-lymphoma therapy with no evidence of progression, PFS was censored at time of last adequate tumor assessment with no evidence of progression prior to the start of new anti-lymphoma treatment.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of disease progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Population: Intent to Treat population defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to the Independent Review Committee4.01 months
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression (TTP) According to the Independent Review Committee

Kaplan Meier estimate of time to progression was calculated as time from the start of the study drug therapy to the first observation of disease progression. Participants who died without progression were censored at the date of death; otherwise, the censoring rules presented above for PFS applied to the analysis of TTP. Progressive Disease(PD): Appearance of new lesion or increase by ≥50% from previously involved sites from nadir

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of progression; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median time in follow-up was 16.34 months

Population: Intent to Treat population was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Progression (TTP) According to the Independent Review Committee5.46 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to the Independent Review Committee

Time to treatment failure (TTF) was calculated from the start of study drug therapy to early discontinuation from treatment due to any cause, including disease progression, toxicity, or death and was based on site-reported data.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented time of treatment failure; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Population: Intent to Treat population was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideKaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) According to the Independent Review Committee3.75 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events were assessed using National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 3: according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Adverse Event (AE), Grade 2 = Moderate AE, Grade 3 = Severe and Undesirable AE, Grade 4 = Life-threatening or Disabling AE, and Grade 5 = Death; Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose. A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: From the first dose of lenalidomide through 28 days after the last dose during the follow-up phase; median (minimum, maximum) duration of treatment was 94.0 (1.0, 1950 days)

Population: The safety population received at least one dose of lenalidomide was used for all safety analysis. This was identical to the ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE132 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Related to Investigational Product (IP)118 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Grade 3-5 AE106 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Grade 3 AE101 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Grade 4 AE57 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Grade 5 AE18 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3-5 AE Related to IP90 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 3 AE Related to IP88 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 4 AE Related to IP41 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Grade 5 AE Related to IP2 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Serious Adverse Event (SAE)70 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE Related to IP30 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE Leading to Stopping of IP28 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Stopping IP16 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE Leading to Dose Reduction55 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE Leading to IP Interruption81 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any Treatment Related AE Leading to Dose Reduction52 participants
LenalidomideNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment Related AE Leading to IP Interruption66 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival was calculated from the time the first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented date of progressive disease or death; up to the final data cut-off date of 30 March 2017; median duration of follow-up for surviving participants was 62.94 months

Population: Intent to Treat population defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideOverall Survival (OS)19.50 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) /Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

The percentage of participants whose best response was CR or CRu. Participants who had discontinued before CR/CRu was observed, or changed to other anti-lymphoma treatments before a CR/CRu response had been observed, were considered as non-responders. CR is defined as the disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease; CRu is defined as a CR, with a 1) residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm that has decreased by 75% in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD). Individual nodes previously confluent decreased by more than 75% in the SPD compared with original mass; 2) indeterminate bone marrow.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to progression or early treatment discontinuation; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; Median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Population: The ITT population was defined as all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LenalidomidePercentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) /Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee9.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee

Time to Complete Response (CR+CRu) was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of the first occurrence of at least CRu and was calculated only for participants with CR or CRu.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to first documented CR/CRu or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Population: Included participants from the ITT population who achieved a CRu or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideTime to Complete Response (CR+CRu) According to the Independent Review Committee3.9 months
Secondary

Time to Response (TTR)

Time to Response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the date of the first response (having at least a PR) and was calculated only for responding participants.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study drug to time of first documented PR or better; up to data cut-off date of 06 April 2016; median duration of treatment was 94.5 days

Population: Included participants from the ITT population who achieved a PR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LenalidomideTime to Response (TTR)3.5 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026