Skip to content

A Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study of Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013) in Japanese Participants With Chronic Pain

A Study of a Long-term Administration of JNS013 in Patients With Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00736957
Enrollment
219
Registered
2008-08-18
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2014-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Chronic Pain, Acetaminophen, Tramadol, JNS013

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol hydrochloride plus acetaminophen (JNS013) with long term administration in participants with chronic pain.

Detailed description

This is an open-label (both physician and participant know the name of the study drug), non-randomized, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) and long-term efficacy and safety study of JNS013 (combination of tramadol hydrochloride (TRAM) with acetaminophen \[APAP\]) in participants with chronic pain (aching sensation that persists for more than a few months. It may or may not be associated with trauma or disease, and may persist after the initial injury has healed. Its localization, character, and timing are more vague than with acute pain). This study consists of 4 periods; screening period: 1 week, treatment period I: 4 weeks, treatment period II: 48 weeks and follow-up period: 1 week. During Treatment Period I, restrictions on concomitant treatments will be established and the participants will be treated with one or two tablets of JNS013, four times daily for four weeks. During Treatment Period II, the participants will be treated for 48 weeks using the same dosing method and dose level for JNS013 as was used during Treatment Period I, permitting modifications to the concomitant drugs/therapies as during normal medical care. Throughout both Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II, the decision will be made to permit the participants to select to use either one or two tablets of JNS013 per dose according to the extent of the participant's pain and tolerability. The total duration of treatment period will be of 52 weeks. Efficacy will be assessed using change from baseline in Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS24) score at the pre-defined time point until Week 52. Participants safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGTramadol Hydrochloride (HCL) plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)

Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 milligram (mg) plus acetaminophen 325 mg (JNS013) one or two tablets will be given orally four times daily (maximum dose is 8 tablets per day) for 4 weeks during treatment period 1 (restrictions on concomitant treatments will be established) and for 48 weeks during treatment period 2 (permitting modifications to the concomitant drugs/therapies). The dosing interval will be of at least 4 hours.

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants whose pain cannot be controlled sufficiently with at least 14-day continuous treatment with identical oral non steroid anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at a usual maximum dose during 3 months prior to this study * Ambulatory participants without need for any supportive device or assistance during daily life * Outpatients * Participants who do not plan to change the therapeutic policy and content of the medications for underlying disease during screening period to the end of Treatment Period I * Sustention of chronic pain due to Osteo Arthritis (OA), Low Back Pain (LBP), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Neck Shoulder Arm Syndrome (NSAS), Diabetic Neuropathy (DN), Post herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) or other for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with conditions for which opioids are contraindicated * Participants with conditions for which APAP are contraindicated * Participants with history of convulsion or the possibility of convulsive seizure * Participants with concurrent, previous, or possible alcohol dependence, drug dependence, or narcotic addiction * Pregnant Participants or those who may be pregnant, lactating mothers, and Participants who wish pregnancy during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS24) Score at Week 4Baseline and Week 4Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 millimeter (mm)=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.
Change From Baseline in VAS24 Score at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Relief (PAR) Score at Week 4Week 4Pain relief was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale from 4 (complete relief) to 0 (no relief). An increase in score represented improvement and decrease represented disease progression
Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 ScoreWeek 4 and 52Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreBaseline, Week 4 and 52SF-36 is a metric for general health and Quality of Life (QOL), consists of 8 sub-scale indices related to health and QOL (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each of the sub-scale scores ranged from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate a better health status or a better mental status.
Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at Week 4Week 4PRID was sum of the PID and PAR for each participant at each evaluation time point (2 hours after dosing, 4 hours after dosing). Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranges from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain and PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved). PAR ranges from 0 (no improved) to +4 (the most improved). PRID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +7 (the most improved).
Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Week 4Week 4PID is defined as the amount of change in the pain intensity at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the study drug dosing) from the baseline for each participant. Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranging from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain. PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved).

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

219 participants were enrolled in this study out of which 29 participants did not meet the criteria to transfer to treatment period 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)
Tramadol hydrochloride 37.5 milligram (mg) plus acetaminophen 325 mg (JNS013) one or two tablets was given orally four times daily (maximum dose was 8 tablets per day) for 4 weeks during treatment period 1 (restrictions on concomitant treatments was established) and for 48 weeks during treatment period 2 (permitting modifications to the concomitant drugs/therapies). The dosing interval was of at least 4 hours.
190
Total190

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event43
Overall Studydid not attend hospital appointments1
Overall Studynot eligible for Treatment Period I22
Overall StudyPhysician Decision5
Overall Studyviolation of eligibility criteria2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)
Age, Continuous64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
84 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
189 / 190
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 190

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in VAS24 Score at Week 52

Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in VAS24 Score at Week 52Baseline65.80 millimeterStandard Deviation 11.629
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in VAS24 Score at Week 52Change at Week 52-36.54 millimeterStandard Deviation 21.936
Primary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS24) Score at Week 4

Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 millimeter (mm)=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS24) Score at Week 4Baseline65.80 millimeterStandard Deviation 11.629
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS24) Score at Week 4Change at Week 4-22.28 millimeterStandard Deviation 21.189
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score

SF-36 is a metric for general health and Quality of Life (QOL), consists of 8 sub-scale indices related to health and QOL (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Each of the sub-scale scores ranged from 0 to 100, where higher values indicate a better health status or a better mental status.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and 52

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure and n = the number of participants with measurements for that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScorePhysical functioning:Baseline33.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.03
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-emotional:Baseline39.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.97
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScorePhysical functioning:Change at Week 4 (n=150)2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.06
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScorePhysical functioning:Change at Week 52 (n=96)4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-physical:Baseline35.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.43
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-physical:Change at Week 4 (n=150)3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-physical:Change at Week 52 (n=96)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.76
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreBodily pain:Baseline33.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreBodily pain:Change at Week 4 (n=150)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreBodily pain:Change at Week 52 (n=96)9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.74
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreGeneral health:Baseline42.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreGeneral health:Change at Week 4 (n=150)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreGeneral health:Change at Week 52 (n=96)3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreVitality:Baseline44.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreVitality:Change at Week 4 (n=150)2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.37
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreVitality:Change at Week 52 (n=96)4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreSocial functioning:Baseline41.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.61
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreSocial functioning:Change at Week 4 (n=150)2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.36
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreSocial functioning:Change at Week 52 (n=96)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.57
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-emotional:Change at Week 4 (n=150)2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.43
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreRole-emotional:Change at Week 52 (n=96)5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.44
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreMental health:Baseline43.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreMental health:Change at Week 4 (n=150)2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) ScoreMental health:Change at Week 52 (n=96)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 Score

Pain over the last 24 hours was assessed by using VAS score ranges from 0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented improvement.

Time frame: Week 4 and 52

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 ScoreImprovement of 30 percent or more at Week 476 participants
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 ScoreImprovement of 50 percent or more at Week 451 participants
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 ScoreImprovement of 30 percent or more at Week 52110 participants
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Number of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in VAS24 ScoreImprovement of 50 percent or more at Week 5277 participants
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Week 4

PID is defined as the amount of change in the pain intensity at each evaluation time point (at 2 and 4 hours after the study drug dosing) from the baseline for each participant. Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranging from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain. PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved).

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment. Participants showing a Pain Intensity (PI) value of 0 prior to dosing at each evaluation time point were not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Week 42 hours after dosing at Week 40.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Week 44 hours after dosing at Week 40.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at Week 4

PRID was sum of the PID and PAR for each participant at each evaluation time point (2 hours after dosing, 4 hours after dosing). Pain Intensity was evaluated on a 4-stage scale ranges from 3=severe pain to 0=no pain and PID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +3 (the most improved). PAR ranges from 0 (no improved) to +4 (the most improved). PRID ranges from -3 (the worst) to +7 (the most improved).

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment. Participants showing a Pain Intensity (PI) value of 0 prior to dosing at each evaluation time point were not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at Week 42 hours after dosing at Week 41.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at Week 44 hours after dosing at Week 41.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Score at Week 4

Pain relief was evaluated based on a 5-stage scale from 4 (complete relief) to 0 (no relief). An increase in score represented improvement and decrease represented disease progression

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Full analysis set included all participants who met the eligibility criteria, received study medication and had at least one post-treatment efiicacy assessment. Participants showing a Pain Intensity (PI) value of 0 prior to dosing at each evaluation time point were not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Relief (PAR) Score at Week 42 hours after dosing at Week 41.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Tramadol Hydrochloride Plus Acetaminophen (JNS013)Pain Relief (PAR) Score at Week 44 hours after dosing at Week 41.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026