Skip to content

A(f)MAZE-CABG Study

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Freedom From Atrial Fibrillation at One Year Post CABG in Patients Undergoing Concomitant Left Atrial Ablation Using HIFU Versus CABG in Patients With Persistent or Long Standing Persistent AF

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00735722
Acronym
AFMAZE-CABG
Enrollment
188
Registered
2008-08-15
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2019-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Keywords

AF, CAD

Brief summary

Concomitant AF ablation with HIFU in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF undergoing CABG will be superior in restoring SR, compared with patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF undergoing CABG treated with best medical treatment according to ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines and no AF ablation.

Detailed description

Primary Objective • To compare the efficacy of concomitant AF ablation using HIFU to no ablation at 12 months in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF undergoing CABG according to ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines and HRS/EHRA/ECAS Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation . Secondary Objectives * To compare the safety of concomitant AF ablation using HIFU to no ablation in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF undergoing CABG. * To compare AF burden in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF treated with concomitant HIFU AF ablation undergoing CABG to those receiving no ablation. * To compare the quality of life of patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF treated with concomitant HIFU AF ablation undergoing CABG to those receiving no ablation. * To compare the health economic impact of concomitant AF ablation with HIFU in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF undergoing CABG to those receiving no ablation. * To compare the morbidity associated with persistent or long standing persistent AF in patients following CABG and ablation compared to those receiving no ablation. * To compare cardiac function and left atrial transport associated with persistent or long standing persistent AF patients following CABG and ablation compared to those receiving no ablation. * To document the incidence of immediate post ablation bidirectional conduction block through the pulmonary venous cinch and mitral lines. * To document the effect of Intra-operative pre and post ablation stimulation and ablation of the autonomic ganglia.

Interventions

DEVICEHIFU AF Ablation

Concomitant left atrial ablation using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Legal age in host country * Scheduled for CABG surgery * Patient suffering from persistent or long-standing persistent AF * Patients having the ability to fully comply with the study requirements * Life expectancy \> 2 years * Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant local or systemic infection or active endocarditis * Sutures, pacing/defibrillator leads on the left side of the heart, valve prostheses or rings, or other implanted material in or adjacent to target treatment area. * Stent in the coronary artery preventing an adequate mitral line * Any other concomitant operation on the heart * Previous heart surgery * Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant * Previous catheter ablation for atrial arrhythmia * LA size more than 60 mm in apical view on Trans-Thoracic Echocardiogram (TTE) * LA thrombus on intra-operative Trans-Oesophageal Echocardiogram (TOE) * Known contraindication to Amiodarone * Inability to undergo TOE * Patients who are unable to give full informed consent for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom from Atrial Arrhythmias (AF, Atrial Flutter, Atrial Tachycardia) at 12 months12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Freedom from AF and other atrial arrhythmias at 24 months post ablation procedure (determined by 72 hour Holter monitor)24 months
AF burden (determined by 24 and 72 hour Holter monitor).24 months
Morbidity performing concurrent ablation in patients undergoing CABG assessed using length of ICU and hospital stay24 months
Incidence of stroke, TIA, PV stenosis, bleeding, thromboembolic complications, subsequent pace maker implantation, and death24 months
Freedom from AF and other atrial arrhythmias at 3, 6, 9 and 18 months post ablation procedure (determined by 24 hour Holter monitor)18 months
Incidence of conduction block post ablation both intraoperatively across the pulmonary venous and mitral linesAt intervention
Effect of autonomic ganglia stimulation pre and post ablation intra-operativelyDischarge
Quality of life measurements (SF-36)24 months
LV function and dimensions and LA size/transport capability24 months

Countries

Canada, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026