Skip to content

Combining Objective and Subjective Sedation Assessment Tools

Combining Objective and Subjective Sedation Assessment Tools - Second Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00734409
Acronym
COST_2
Enrollment
300
Registered
2008-08-14
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2013-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation, Human, conscious sedation, bispectral index, monitoring, critical care, propofol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a device called the BIS monitor in addition to the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale will give better assessment of a subject's level of sedation.

Detailed description

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who require a ventilator to help them breathe also require sedation in order to keep them comfortable and prevent injury. The national guidelines for sedation management include a daily interruption of sedation performed once each morning. To determine the amount of sedation needed, the current standard practice is to use a system called the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). The patient is stimulated by calling their name or by tapping their shoulder until the patient's responses indicate that a satisfactory level of sedation has been achieved. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a device called the BIS monitor in addition to the RASS will give better assessment of a subject's level of sedation. The BIS monitor is a sensor strip taped to the forehead and attached to a device that reads electrical activity from the brain. It is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring patients under sedation.

Interventions

DEVICEBispectral Index (BIS) Monitor

BIS monitoring in addition to RASS assessments

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient in the ICU * continuous IV sedation with propofol midazolam or dexmedetomidine * age \> 18 * expected to require mechanical ventilation for \>=48 hours

Exclusion criteria

* prisoners * no available space on forehead * continuous electroencephalography(EEG) monitoring * bifrontal brain injury * barbiturate coma therapy * known hypersensitivity to study medications * high risk for ethanol (ETOH) withdrawal * resuscitation from cardiac arrest without recovery of mental status * moribund clinical state (death expected within 48 hours)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Sedative UseIntensive Care Unit (ICU) stay through dischargeThe mean amount of propofol used on each patient while the patient was in the ICU and receiving mechanical ventilation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned Self-device Removal EventsICU stay through dischargeThe number of unplanned self-device removal events that took place during the study period.
Mean Days on Mechanical VentilationICU stay- through dischargeThe mean number of days that the patients were on mechanical ventilation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were in the Medical ICU or Neuro ICU at Duke University Hospital or the mixed ICU at Durham Regional. If patients met all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria, the attending was asked if patient's legally authorized representative (LAR) could be approached for consent. Enrollment started May of 2008 and closed April of 2011.

Pre-assignment details

Patients were only excluded from the trial after consent and prior to randomization if they no longer met inclusion criteria, for instance the medical team decided to remove sedatives.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RASS Plus BIS
Participants in this arm will receive sedation assessment with the RASS scale augmented with BIS monitoring.
155
RASS Only
Participants will receive sedation assessment only using the RASS scale which is the standard of care at our institution
145
Total300

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRASS Plus BISRASS OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
53 Participants46 Participants99 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
102 Participants99 Participants201 Participants
Age Continuous53.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.15
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
55.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.91
Region of Enrollment
United States
155 participants145 participants300 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants71 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants74 Participants153 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1551 / 145
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1550 / 145

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Sedative Use

The mean amount of propofol used on each patient while the patient was in the ICU and receiving mechanical ventilation.

Time frame: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay through discharge

Population: All patients who met eligibility requirements, consented for the trial, and were randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RASS Plus BISMean Sedative Use13.35 ml/hourStandard Deviation 11.79
RASS OnlyMean Sedative Use15.54 ml/hourStandard Deviation 11.88
Secondary

Mean Days on Mechanical Ventilation

The mean number of days that the patients were on mechanical ventilation.

Time frame: ICU stay- through discharge

Population: All patients who met eligibility requirements, consented for the trial, and were randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RASS Plus BISMean Days on Mechanical Ventilation7.43 DaysStandard Deviation 8.32
RASS OnlyMean Days on Mechanical Ventilation6.85 DaysStandard Deviation 12.57
Secondary

Unplanned Self-device Removal Events

The number of unplanned self-device removal events that took place during the study period.

Time frame: ICU stay through discharge

Population: All patients who met eligibility requirements, consented for the trial, and were randomized were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RASS Plus BISUnplanned Self-device Removal Events0 Event
RASS OnlyUnplanned Self-device Removal Events1 Event

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026