Skip to content

Evaluation of Physiologic and Standard Sex Steroid Replacement Regimens in Women With Premature Ovarian Failure

Comparison of Standard and Physiologic Sex Steroid Replacement Regimens in Women With Premature Ovarian Failure and the Assessment of Skeletal, Cardiovascular and Reproductive Parameters

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00732693
Enrollment
42
Registered
2008-08-12
Start date
2002-02-28
Completion date
2006-11-30
Last updated
2008-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Premature Ovarian Failure

Keywords

Premature ovarian failure, Sex hormone replacement, HRT, Blood pressure, Bone mineral density, Bone metabolism, Uterine function

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to determine whether physiological sex steroid replacement improves parameters of skeletal, cardiovascular and reproductive health of women treated with current sex steroid replacement regimens.

Detailed description

Premature ovarian failure, defined as the onset of the menopause before the age of 40 years, is a relatively common problem that affects 1% of women. There are a variety of aetiologies underlying premature ovarian failure including Turner syndrome and those with idiopathic onset, however with the increasing success of intensive treatment for childhood cancer, there are increasing numbers of young survivors, with a variety of late effects of treatment, including premature ovarian failure. Evidence is required for the optimal management of young women with premature ovarian failure, either as a result of childhood cancer treatment or for other reasons. These women are currently offered combined sex steroid replacement in the convenient form of the oral contraceptive pill, or hormone replacement therapy, designed for older women after the menopause. These preparations are not designed to achieve physiological replacement of oestrogen or progesterone, either in dosage or in biochemical structure - many preparations using synthetic derivatives. These younger women who have differing metabolic and psychological requirements are looking to a future of 30 or more years of replacement. The optimal mode of SSR is not known for young women with premature ovarian failure, however there is concern that current regimens may be inadequate for optimal skeletal and cardiovascular health. Current preliminary data demonstrates that use of physiological sex steroid replacement improves uterine parameters. Evidence is required to determine whether optimising sex steroid replacement can also significantly improve parameters of skeletal and cardiovascular health. Young women with ovarian failure face several decades of hormone replacement, so small improvements in management may make large differences to later morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to determine whether physiological sex steroid replacement improves parameters of skeletal, cardiovascular and reproductive health of women treated with current sex steroid replacement regimens.

Interventions

DRUGEthinylestradiol / Norethisterone

Oral ethinylestradiol 30mcg and norethisterone 1.5mg daily for weeks 1-3, followed by 7 pill free days

Transdermal estradiol 100mcg daily for week 1, then 150mcg daily for weeks 2-4; and vaginal progesterone pessaries 200mg twice daily for weeks 3-4

Sponsors

University of Edinburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Premature Ovarian Failure

Exclusion criteria

* Intercurrent illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in 24 hour ambulatory blood pressureBefore each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment
Bone mineral density measurements (DEXA)Baseline, 14 and 24 months
Uterine ultrasound scan to assess uterine volume, endometrial thickness, and uterine artery blood flowBefore each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Central arterial blood pressure and arterial stiffness measured using peripheral arterial tonometryBefore each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase
Hormonal assays for gonadotrophins, FSH, LH and sex steroids estrogen and progesteroneBefore each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase
Biochemical evidence of activity on the renin-angiotensin system, including plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, aldosterone, creatinine, urea and electrolyte concentrations.Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase
Serum markers of collagen turnover and bone matrix formationBefore each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026