Skip to content

Titan® One Touch Release Inflatable Penile Prosthesis

Titan® One Touch Release Inflatable Penile Prosthesis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00731939
Enrollment
124
Registered
2008-08-11
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2014-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erectile Dysfunction

Keywords

Erectile Dysfunction, Penile implant, Titan

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump.

Interventions

Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction.

Sponsors

Coloplast A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant has an estimated life expectancy of more than 5 years * Participant has been diagnosed with erectile dysfunction (impotence) * participant is willing to have the Titan OTR IPP implanted * Participant is able and willing to complete all follow-up visits and procedures indicated in the protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Participant is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent Form and /or comply with all follow-up requirements according to the study protocol * Participant had a previous penile prosthesis or prior penile enlargement surgeries * Participant has a compromised immune system, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, discoid lupus, or scleroderma * Participant has had a myocardial infarction or coronary artery stent placement within 2 months prior to treatment * Participant currently has uncontrolled or severe diabetes or other disease significantly reducing wound healing ability * Participant does not have the manual dexterity or mental ability to operate the pump * Participant has chordee or priapism * Participant has penile sensory neuropathy * Participant has serious bleeding disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the Ease of Deflation of the Titan® OTR Pump6 monthsThe study's primary endpoint was to demonstrate that at least 64% of subjects were mostly or completely satisfied with the ability to deflate the device at the 6-month follow-up. The study's primary objective was to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump via subject questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Subjects were asked via questionnaire how satisfied they were with ease of deflation of their implant. Success criteria was a response of satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory. Other possible responses were neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory, somewhat unsatisfactory, and very unsatisfactory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 13 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - overall function
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 23 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 33 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 43 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - ease of inflation
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 53 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - ease of deflation
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 63 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 83 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - length when inflated
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 93 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had?
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 103 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again?
Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2At implantTitan OTR pre-implant product preparation was easier than your usual pump of choice?
Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3At implantThe subject was easily able to accommodate the OTR pump?
Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 73 months post-surgerySubject Satisfaction - width when inflated
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 16 weeksIt was easy for the subject to find the inflation bulb?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 26 weeksIt was easy for the subject to find the deflation touch pads?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 36 weeksIt was easy for the subject to inflate the device?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 46 weeksIt was easy for the subject to compress the deflation touch pads?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 56 weeksSubject training with OTR pump was easier than with previous pump?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 66 weeksThe OTR pump was easy to use at 1st cycling?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 76 weeksThe subject likes the OTR pump?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 86 weeksHow easy was it for the subject to learn?
Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 96 weeksHow likely the subject will need continued training or retraining?
Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)BaselineThe Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline.
Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1At implantTitan OTR pre-implant product preparation was straightforward/simple?

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Titan® OTR IPP
Subjects implanted with Titan® One Touch Release (OTR) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) Inflatable Penile Prosthesis : Hydraulic system designed to be surgically implanted into the penis for the management of erectile dysfunction.
124
Total124

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyDid not meet enrollment criteria2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up15
Overall StudyNot implanted with study device9
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTitan® OTR IPP
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
48 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
76 Participants
Age, Continuous61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Region of Enrollment
Canada
27 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
26 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Assess the Ease of Deflation of the Titan® OTR Pump

The study's primary endpoint was to demonstrate that at least 64% of subjects were mostly or completely satisfied with the ability to deflate the device at the 6-month follow-up. The study's primary objective was to assess the ease of deflation of the Titan® OTR pump via subject questionnaire at 6-month follow-up. Subjects were asked via questionnaire how satisfied they were with ease of deflation of their implant. Success criteria was a response of satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory. Other possible responses were neither satisfactory nor unsatisfactory, somewhat unsatisfactory, and very unsatisfactory.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Deflation of the Titan® OTR Pump70.8 % of participants meeting success criter
Secondary

Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)

The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Ease of erection22.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Erectile function18.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Pleasure from sexual activity35.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Satisfaction with orgasm35.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Confidence to complete sexual activity23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Secondary

Assess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)

The Partner Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) was used. The TSS provides scores ranging from 0 to 100 in 5 domains of Ease of erection, Erectile function, Pleasure from sexual activity, Satisfaction with orgasm and Confidence to complete sexual activity with higher scores indicative of worse symptoms. Available data is summarized for each domain at each visit along with change from baseline.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Ease of erection67.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.3
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Erectile function74.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Pleasure from sexual activity64.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Satisfaction with orgasm62.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
Titan® OTR IPPAssess Partner Satisfaction (Where Applicable)Confidence to complete sexual activity71.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1

Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was straightforward/simple?

Time frame: At implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1Completely disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1Somewhat disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1Neutral2.7 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1Somewhat agree22.1 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR Question 1Completely agree75.2 percentage of responses
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2

Titan OTR pre-implant product preparation was easier than your usual pump of choice?

Time frame: At implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2Somewhat disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2Neutral10.6 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2Somewhat agree40.7 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2Completely agree48.7 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 2Completely disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3

The subject was easily able to accommodate the OTR pump?

Time frame: At implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3Completely disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3Somewhat disagree0.0 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3Neutral2.7 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3Somewhat agree20.4 percentage of responses
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Implant of the Titan® OTR - Question 3Completely agree77.0 percentage of responses
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1

It was easy for the subject to find the inflation bulb?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1Not at all0.0 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1A little0.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1Somewhat4.6 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1Very13.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 1Extremely80.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2

It was easy for the subject to find the deflation touch pads?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2Very26.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2Not at all1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2A little3.7 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2Somewhat9.3 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 2Extremely58.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3

It was easy for the subject to inflate the device?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3Not at all1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3A little0.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3Somewhat4.6 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3Very17.6 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 3Extremely75.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4

It was easy for the subject to compress the deflation touch pads?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4Not at all2.8 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4A little1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4Somewhat10.2 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4Very25.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 4Extremely59.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5

Subject training with OTR pump was easier than with previous pump?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5Not at all1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5A little1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5Somewhat16.7 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5Very16.7 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 5Extremely63.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6

The OTR pump was easy to use at 1st cycling?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6Not at all1.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6A little5.6 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6Somewhat8.3 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6Very21.3 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 6Extremely63.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7

The subject likes the OTR pump?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7Not at all0.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7A little3.7 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7Somewhat13.0 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7Very20.4 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 7Extremely62.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8

How easy was it for the subject to learn?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8Not at all2.8 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8A little8.4 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8Somewhat7.5 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8Very29.9 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 8Extremely51.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Assess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9

How likely the subject will need continued training or retraining?

Time frame: 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9Not at all5.6 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9A little10.3 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9Somewhat11.2 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9Very25.2 percentage of participants
Titan® OTR IPPAssess the Ease of Training for Titan® OTR - Question 9Extremely47.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1

Subject Satisfaction - overall function

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 190.0 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1

Subject Satisfaction - overall function

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 190.6 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1

Subject Satisfaction - overall function

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 172.4 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10

Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again?

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1083.3 % responding yes and probably
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10

Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again?

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1086.7 % responding yes and probably
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 10

Subject Satisfaction - if you had the decision to make again, would you undergo this penile implant procedure again?

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 1072.4 % responding yes and probably
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2

Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 282.2 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2

Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 262.8 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 2

Subject Satisfaction - soft enough to conceal when deflated

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 276.0 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3

Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 360.6 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3

Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 377.6 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 3

Subject Satisfaction - ease of locating the deflation touch pads

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 378.2 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4

Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 486.4 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4

Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 485.3 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 4

Subject Satisfaction - ease of inflation

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 468.1 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5

Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 560.6 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5

Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 570.8 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 5

Subject Satisfaction - ease of deflation

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 573.3 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6

Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 691.5 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6

Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 682.0 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 6

Subject Satisfaction - hardness of erection when inflated

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 693.2 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7

Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 779.8 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7

Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 786.1 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 7

Subject Satisfaction - width when inflated

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 777.6 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8

Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 868.9 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8

Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 854.3 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 8

Subject Satisfaction - length when inflated

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 861.1 % satisfactory or somewhat satisfactory
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9

Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had?

Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 979.8 % responding yes and probably
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9

Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had?

Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 986.5 % responding yes and probably
Secondary

Evaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 9

Subject Satisfaction - would you recommend this penile implant device to men with the same erectile difficulty that you had?

Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Titan® OTR IPPEvaluate User Acceptance of Titan® OTR - Question 987.8 % responding yes and probably

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026