Skip to content

Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and Mirror Training for Phantom Limb Pain

Psychosocial and Visual Feedback Intervention for Phantom Limb Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00731614
Enrollment
59
Registered
2008-08-11
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2019-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phantom Limb

Keywords

cognitive therapy, mirror training, nondirective therapy, veterans, amputees

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to test whether a combination of cognitive-behavior therapy and mirror training reduces phantom limb pain for veterans with amputations.

Detailed description

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial designed to test whether CBT plus mirror therapy (CBT+MT) is superior to supportive care (SC) for treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) in amputees. The primary hypothesis is that CBT+ MT will lead to significantly greater reductions in PLP compared to SC. Secondary hypotheses will test whether CBT+MT also leads to significantly greater improvements in psychiatric symptoms, functioning, and quality of life than SC. Eighty veterans from the San Diego VA Healthcare System (SDVAHS) will be recruited. All veterans will have a unilateral upper or lower limb amputation. All participants will complete an intake assessment prior to treatment randomization. The assessment will include measures of pain (Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire, Descriptive Differential Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire) psychiatric symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire, Posttraumatic Stress disorder Checklist), psychiatric diagnosis (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview) and functioning (Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experiences Scale, Short Form-36). Participants will then randomized to either CBT+MT or SC. Participants will complete pain and mood assessments weekly during treatment, and be retested on the full assessment battery at the end of treatment and 12 and 24 weeks posttreatment. The CBT+MT intervention will consist of 8 individual sessions of CBT, including psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, and acceptance techniques. Participants in the CBT+MT condition will also learn to use a mirror apparatus to reduce PLP, and will receive a set of mirrors to use at home. The SC treatment will consist of the therapist meeting with the patient and using listening and reflection skills to discuss the patient's pain. The SC condition will have no pain education or skills training component. Data analyses will use a repeated-measures ANOVA approach to test whether the two conditions differ on change in the primary measure (Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire) as well as in other pain, psychiatric symptom, functioning and quality of life measures. Exploratory analyses will test whether patient variables and amputation characteristics predict treatment outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy and Mirror Retraining

Cognitive Behavioral Pain Management treatment administered in 8 weeks of individual treatment, combined with training in use of a mirror device to reduce phantom limb pain.

BEHAVIORALSupportive therapy

Non-directive, emotion focused psychotherapy to facilitate coping with pain, delivered in weekly individual sessions.

BEHAVIORALMirror retraining

Use of a mirror to produce an illusion of the missing limb. By attending to the reflected limb while moving the existing limb, the patient provides visual feedback that helps correct changes in the neural organization of the somatosensory cortex resulting from the amputation and contributing to the phantom limb pain

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (21or over) * unilateral amputation at or above wrist or ankle * phantom limb pain occurring at least weekly * living within 50 miles of a recruitment site (San Diego, San Francisco, or Long Beach VAs). * able to read and speak English

Exclusion criteria

* Current alcohol or drug dependence * active psychosis * medical problems that preclude participation * current enrollment in behavioral pain management

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireBaseline, each weekly treatment session (1-8), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks posttreatment.The primary outcome measure is the severity of phantom limb pain on a likert scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Form-12 (SF-12)Baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks after baseline)the Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a standardized self-report questionnaire that assesses mental and physical functioning. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is scored on a scale from 0-100, with higher scores representing better reported health.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

While 59 participant initially enrolled, 1 completed no assessments, so the overall n= 58. In addition, 4 did not complete the first week assessment session, which is why patient flow ends up listing 54 at the start rather than 58.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror Retraining
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Mirror Retraining: Cognitive Behavioral Pain Management treatment administered in 8 weeks of individual treatment, combined with training in use of a mirror device to reduce phantom limb pain. Mirror retraining: Use of a mirror to produce an illusion of the missing limb. By attending to the reflected limb while moving the existing limb, the patient provides visual feedback that helps correct changes in the neural organization of the somatosensory cortex resulting from the amputation and contributing to the phantom limb pain
26
Supportive Psychotherapy
Supportive therapy: Non-directive, emotion focused psychotherapy to facilitate coping with pain, delivered in weekly individual sessions.
32
Total58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingTotalSupportive Psychotherapy
Age, Continuous60.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85
57.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.99
54.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.32
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants39 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants41 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants58 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants53 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 230 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 233 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire

The primary outcome measure is the severity of phantom limb pain on a likert scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)

Time frame: Baseline, each weekly treatment session (1-8), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks posttreatment.

Population: Data analyzed for participants with complete data for all assessments using repeated measure ANOVA.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 3 Pain Severity4.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 6 Pain Severity3.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 2 Pain Severity6.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 7 Pain Severity3.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 4 Pain Severity4.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 8 Pain Severity4.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 1 Pain Severity6.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain Questionnaire12 week posttreatment Pain Severity4.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 5 Pain Severity4.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain Questionnaire24 week posttreatment Pain Severity4.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireIntake Pain Severity6.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain Questionnaire24 week posttreatment Pain Severity4.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireIntake Pain Severity5.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 1 Pain Severity4.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 2 Pain Severity4.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 3 Pain Severity4.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 4 Pain Severity4.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 5 Pain Severity4.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 6 Pain Severity3.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 7 Pain Severity4.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain QuestionnaireSession 8 Pain Severity3.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Supportive PsychotherapyPhantom Limb Pain Questionnaire12 week posttreatment Pain Severity3.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
Comparison: Conducted a repeated measures ANOVA comparing CBT+mirror retraining with Supportive Therapy across 11 time points. The primary hypothesis was a group by time interaction. Due to missing data, a total of 9 and 14 participants, respectively could be included in analyses.p-value: 0.322Repeated Measure ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-12 (SF-12)

the Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a standardized self-report questionnaire that assesses mental and physical functioning. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is scored on a scale from 0-100, with higher scores representing better reported health.

Time frame: Baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks after baseline)

Population: While a total of 49 participants completed the trial, missing data reduced the number in each condition for some analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingShort Form-12 (SF-12)SF12 PCS baseline48.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.12
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + Mirror RetrainingShort Form-12 (SF-12)SF12 PCS 8 weeks (end of treatment)55.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.56
Supportive PsychotherapyShort Form-12 (SF-12)SF12 PCS baseline45.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.66
Supportive PsychotherapyShort Form-12 (SF-12)SF12 PCS 8 weeks (end of treatment)46.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026