Hepatectomy
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate whether applying inflow vascular occlusion in modern liver resection is associated with better clinical outcome. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to the two surgical techniques: with or without the application of inflow vascular occlusion. Patients outcome including liver function recovery, operative time and blood loss are compared.
Interventions
Pringle maneuver is performed by isolation of the hepatoduodenal ligament which is then encircled and occluded with atraumatic vascular clamp. The clamp is applied for 15 minutes followed by unclamping for 5 minutes and repeated till end of liver transection. Limits of clamp cycle: 3 cycles for cirrhotic liver; 4 cycles for non-cirrhotic liver.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age \> 18 years * Child-Pugh Class A or B
Exclusion criteria
* Informed consent not available * Presence of portal vein thrombosis, portal vein tumor thrombus, or previous portal vein embolisation * Presence of hepatic artery thrombosis, previous transarterial therapy like TACE, or transarterial internal radiation * When portal vein resection is anticipated * Emergency hepatectomy * Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma * Rehepatectomy (repeated liver resection) * Adhesion or anatomical variation that preclude safe and successful application of Pringle maneuver * When concomitant bowel or bile duct resection is anticipated
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Operative blood loss | From skin incision to completion of operation |
| Operative time | From skin incision to completion of operation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Operative morbidity and mortality | From date of operation to 30-day after operation |
| Recovery of liver function | From date of operation to date of discharge |
Countries
China