Skip to content

Creatine Augmentation Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder Subjects

Efficacy and Safety of Augmentation of Creatine for the Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00729755
Enrollment
59
Registered
2008-08-07
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2017-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Creatine, Augmentation, Major Depressive Disorder, Efficacy, Brain Energy Metabolism

Brief summary

Given 1) the established safety with short-term or long-term supplementation of Cr, 2) its potential usefulness in improving brain energy metabolism, 3) the reported abnormality in brain energy metabolism in MDD subjects, and 4) plausible association between depression and inflammatory mediators, we hypothesize that oral Cr augmentation will help reduce symptoms in MDD patients as well as normalize a deficit in brain energy metabolism and that improvement of MDD and brain energy metabolism will be correlated with inflammatory mediators changes. In this study, we plan to conduct an randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled augmentation study with creatine in addition to escitalopram. We will assess the efficacy and safety of the Cr augmentation and evaluate changes relevant to brain energy metabolism and inflammatory mediators.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCreatine monohydrate

In addition to 10-20mg escitalopram, the subjects will be given total 3 gram of creatine (500mg/capsule) a day in first week and then, 5 gram a day in the rest of the weeks.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

In addition to 10-20mg escitalopram, the subjects will be given total 6 capsules of placebo (equal quantities to those of creatine group) a day in first week and then, 10 capsules a day in the rest of the weeks.

Sponsors

Ewha Womans University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 19-65 year-old male or female * Major depressive disorder diagnosed by SCID-IV * Hamilton depression rating scale score \>= 16 at screening * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Suicidal idea that needs hospitalization * Any other axis I psychiatric disorder * Neurologic disease (eg., epilepsy, infarct, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor) * IQ below 80 * Inflammatory disease including autoimmune disease * Taking anti-inflammatory medication * Serious physical disease * Substance abuse or dependence history in recent 6 months * Pregnant or having plan to be pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hamilton depression rating scalebaseline, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Side effects assessment: the interview and examination by the investigatorsbaseline, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th week
Serum inflammatory mediators (eg., IL-1, -2, PGE2, interferon gamma) levelbaseline, 8th week
Clinical global impression scalebaseline, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th week
Brain MRIbaseline, 8th week
Montgomery-Asberg depression scalebaseline, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th week
Serum creatinine levelbaseline, 2nd, 8th week

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026