Skip to content

Optimal Anti-tachycardia Therapy in Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Patients Without Pacing Indications

Optimal Antitachycardia Therapy in ICD Patients Without Pacing Indications

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00729703
Acronym
OPTION
Enrollment
462
Registered
2008-08-07
Start date
2006-06-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tachycardia

Keywords

ICD, Minimized, ventricular, pacing, indication, Clinical outcome, Inappropriate shock

Brief summary

This study evaluates the impact of a new pacing mode avoiding unnecessary ventricular stimulation in combination with advanced dual chamber detection with slow VT management on the clinical outcome for hospitalization and mortality and inadequate therapy in medically stable, ICD-indicated patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVEF ≤ 40%) who do not have pacing indications and no indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). It compares a new pacing mode avoiding ventricular stimulation when not needed combined with dual chamber detection with a pure ventricular back up pacing and single chamber detection criteria with pure ventricular back up pacing. Therapies are compared in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel trial with a 24-month randomized treatment period. Randomization follows a 1:1 ratio. ICD therapy is enabled for all patients throughout the study. All patients receive optimal drug therapy for arrhythmia and heart failure treatment.

Detailed description

All patients will receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator OVATIO™ DR model 6550 or a later Sorin Group device offering the same functions. After Enrolment visit but before implant, patients will be randomized in two arms according to the parallel study design. Whenever possible before implant there will be the first Holter recording for the Tvar risk stratification procedure. In case Tvar recording could not be performed before implant it has to be performed before patient leaves the hospital post implant in unpaced rhythm. The dual-chamber arm will be programmed to 3 detection zones with PARAD+ activated. The TDI for the slow VT zone will be set to 500 ms (120 bpm - or in case the resting rate is higher than 90 bpm it is recommended to adjust this parameter to: resting rate + 30 bpm) and at least one ATP program activated as specified in table 1. A VT zone with a TDI of 353 ms (170 bpm) in case of no history of VT or a TDI cycle length equalling slowest documented VT interval (spontaneous or induced) plus 50 ms is required. In this 2nd VT zone therapies need to be activated in this group. AAIsafeR2 mode will be activated with a basic rate of 60 bpm. The single-chamber arm will be programmed to optimal detection with Acceleration (Onset), Stability and Long Cycle Search (VTLC) activated. A VT zone is requested in this group, with the same programming procedures as described above. Therapies will be set according to the clinical judgment of the participating investigators but a Slow VT-zone with TDI 500 ms in monitoring setting at least is required.

Interventions

DEVICEOvatio DR 6550

Dual-chamber ICD therapy with minimized ventricular pacing

DEVICEOVATIO DR 6550

Single-chamber device therapy with settings which are common in clinical practice.

Sponsors

LivaNova
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has been prescribed the implantation for an ICD system accordingly to the relevant currently-approved ACC/AHA guidelines 1 or ESC guidelines 35 or any relevant currently-approved local guidelines for the implantation of an ICD-system * Impaired left ventricular function demonstrated by a left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40 %, measured by angio-scintigraphy, echocardiography, or contrast ventriculogram. * An optimal (as determined by the enrolling physician) medical regimen. * Patient has received all relevant information on the study, and has signed and dated a consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Any generally accepted indication for standard cardiac pacing, or any contraindication for standard cardiac pacing. * Any indication for CRT accordingly to the relevant currently-approved ACC/AHA1 or ESC35 guidelines for the implantation of a CRT system. * Any contraindication for ICD therapy and the implant of a dual chamber ICD. * ICD replacement * Chronic atrial arrhythmias or cardioversion for atrial fibrillation within the past month. * A PR interval \> 250 ms or AR interval \> 300 ms measured at implant. * Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. * Acute myocarditis. * Unstable coronary symptoms or myocardial infarction within the last month. * Recent (within the last month) or planned cardiac revascularization or coronary angioplasty. * Recently performed (in the last month) or planned cardiac surgery * Already included in another clinical study. * Life expectancy less than 24 months. * Inability to understand the purpose of the study or refusal to cooperate. * Inability or refusal to provide informed consent and, if not part of the informed consent, a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization. * Unavailability for scheduled follow-up at the implanting or cooperating center. * Age of less than 18 years. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The first part is the time to first occurrence of inappropriate ICD shock therapy. The second part is the composite endpoint of time to first occurrence of death (all causes)or Hospitalizations due to cardio-vascular event.implant, 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, 21 months and 27 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hospitalizations due to cardio-vascular event (specified for each type of event)27 months follow up
Time to first occurrence of inappropriate ICD shock therapy27 months follow up
Evaluation of the impact of the different therapies on quality of life and heart failure status27 months follow up
Sensitivity and specificity for VT/SVT discrimination for the first 100 patients in each group.27 months
Inappropriate overall device reactions defined by inappropriate shock and/or ATP therapy or inappropriate therapy delay/inhibition > 2 minutes on VTs27 months
time to first documented AF occurrence and number of patients moving into permanent or persistent AF27 months follow up
Cardiac dimensions obtained by echo evaluation for a subset of patients of both groupsBaseline and 27 months
all cause mortality and cardio-vascular related mortality27 months follow up
Unscheduled visits and hospitalizations due to slow VT27 months follow up
System related complications including lead dislodgements, exit block, oversensing which requires programming corrections, infections, complications which require reintervention27 months follow up
Cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing and proportion of patients with 0% V pacing.27 months follow up
Overall success rate of ATP in the FVT zone27 months
Cost effectiveness of applied ICD therapy27 months
PPV and NPV for Tvar risk stratification27 months
Slow VT incidence27 months

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026