Skip to content

Phase I Trial of an Investigational Small Pox Medication

A Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover, Exploratory Study of the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of Form I Versus Form V Capsules of the Anti-Orthopoxvirus Compound ST-246® in Fed Normal Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00728689
Enrollment
12
Registered
2008-08-06
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2015-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Monkey Pox, Orthopoxviral Disease, Smallpox

Keywords

Orthopoxviral, Smallpox, Monkey pox

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters and safety of a single dose of ST-246 400mg Form I versus ST-246 400mg Form V capsules in fed normal healthy volunteers.

Detailed description

This was a Phase I, double-blind, cross-over, single-dose study of the orally administered anti-orthopoxvirus compound, ST-246, to 12 healthy, fed volunteers between the ages of 18 and 50 years. Subjects were randomized such that 6 subjects received either ST-246 Form I (monohydrate) followed 10 days later after a wash-out period by Form V (hemihydrate), and 6 subjects received ST-246 Form V followed by Form I, as for the previous group. Both forms of ST-246 were similar in the way they were manufactured. The only difference between Form I and Form V may be related to how it dissolves, and this may affect the way that it is absorbed in the human body. Information about any side-effects that may occur will also be collected in this study.

Interventions

DRUGST-246 Days 1 - 3

First Intervention is on Days 1 - 3, and includes 6 patients dosed once orally with ST-246 Form I (Arm 1), and 6 patients dosed once orally with ST-246 Form V (Arm 2).

DRUGST-246 Days 11 - 13

Second Intervention is on Days 11 - 13 (after a 3 day post-treatment monitoring and 7 day wash-out period) where the 6 patients previously given ST-246 Form I (Arm 1) are now dosed once orally with ST-246 Form V, and the 6 patients previously given ST-246 Form V (Arm 2) are now dosed once orally with ST-246 Form I.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
SIGA Technologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 to 50 years 2. Available for clinical follow-up duration of study. 3. Able/willing to give written consent. 4. Good general health; no clinically significant medical history. 5. Refrain from taking any medications from screening through 72 hours after last dose. 6. Adequate venous access. 7. PE and lab results without clinically significant findings within 28 days prior to receipt of drug. 8. Meet Lab Criteria within 28 days prior to receipt of drug. 9. Negative pregnancy test 10. Non smokers 11. No alcohol or caffeine 12. Participant or partner has undergone surgical sterilization, or the participant agrees either to be abstinent or use two non-hormonal methods of contraception for duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Marked baseline prolongation of QT/corrected QT interval (QTc) interval ( 2. History of additional risk factors for Torsade de Pointes 3. Clinically significant abnormal ECG 4. Personal history of cardiac disease, symptomatic or asymptomatic arrhythmias, syncopal episodes, or prolongation of the PR interval 5. Family history of Sudden Cardiac Death not clearly due to acute myocardial infarction. 6. History of any clinically significant conditions including: * Asthma * Diabetes mellitus * History of thyroidectomy or thyroid disease * Serious angioedema episodes * Head trauma resulting in a diagnosis of TBI other than concussion * Seizure or history of seizure * Bleeding disorder diagnosed by a doctor or significant bruising or bleeding difficulties with intramuscular injections or blood draws * Malignancy 7. Family history of idiopathic seizures 8. History or presence of neutropenia or other blood dyscrasia 9. Known Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection 10. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome illness. 11. Current or recent history of a clinically significant bacterial, fungal, or mycobacterial infection. 12. Known clinically significant chronic viral infection (or current clinically significant viral infection 13. History of frequent or severe headaches or migraines 14. Known chronic bacterial, mycobacterial, fungal, parasitic, or protozoal infection 15. Woman who is pregnant or is breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant 16. On any concomitant medications 17. History of drug allergy that, in the opinion of the PI, contraindicates participation in the trial. 18. Inability to swallow medication 19. Body Mass Index above 35 or below 18, 20. Current drug abuse or alcohol abuse. 21. Inability to refrain from physical exercise for a period of 24 hr before and after a PK day or refrain from consuming xanthines, grapefruit or grapefruit juice 22. Clinically significant lactose intolerance 23. Received experimental drug within 30 days 24. Vaccination within 30 days 25. Total of more than 350 milliliters (mL) of blood drawn in 2 months 26. Treatment with any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory medication in 3 months 27. Any condition occupational reason or other responsibility that, in the judgment of the PI, would jeopardize the safety or rights of a subject participating in the trial or would render the subject unable to comply with the protocol 28. History or diagnosis that would affect absorption of study medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrsMean terminal half-life (t½; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τPost-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrsArea under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, where t is the last timepoint with a drug concentration ≥ lowest obtainable quantification (AUC0-τ; ng\*hr/mL).
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrsArea under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞; ng\*hr/mL).
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: CmaxPost-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrsMaximum drug concentration in plasma, determined directly from individual concentration-time data (Cmax)
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: TmaxPost-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrsTime to maximum plasma concentration(Tmax; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters4 weeksEvaluated safety parameters included: 1. physical examination/vital signs 2. electrocardiograms (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc Bazett) 3. laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis) 4. adverse events For a), b) and c), summary statistics (mean,SD, median, minm, maxm)for values, and changes from baseline(Day 1 pre-dose) to each timepoint, were measured and compared to laboratory normal reference ranges. Values for a)- d) were assigned grades according to DAIDS AE Grading Table. Any Grade of 3 or higher was considered severe and significant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study period was approximately 2 weeks (from August 26, 2008 to September 8, 2008), plus a 30-day post-treatment follow up. The study was conducted at a Phase I Study Unit of a Clinical Research Center in Orlando, FL.

Pre-assignment details

All participants needed to meet strict entry criteria. Sixty-three subjects were screened to randomize 12 subjects into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ST-246 Form I Followed by Form V
Each of six subjects receive a single 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form I, followed 10 days later by a single 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form V. Both forms of drug are orally administered within 30 minutes after a standard light meal consisting of 400-450 calories and approximately 25% fat.
6
ST-246 Form V Followed by Form I
Each of six subjects receive a single 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form V, followed 10 days later by a single 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form I. Both forms of drug are orally administered within 30 minutes after a standard light meal consisting of 400-450 calories and approximately 25% fat.
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Washout Period (Days 4 - 10)Death in family10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicST-246 Form V Followed by Form IST-246 Form I Followed by Form VTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous34.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
34.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 122 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞; ng\*hr/mL).

Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants. Outlier values were excluded from analyses for 3 subject PK profiles (one Form I and 2 Form V). Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ST-246 Form IPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞19922.017 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 6543.563
ST-246 Form VPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞21982.709 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 9330.953
Comparison: A sample size of 12 subjects was chosen to provide a statistical power of 80% to detect a 25% difference of the Form V mean between the Form I and Form V doses at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for this crossover design. Firstly, a parametric (normal theory) general linear model was applied and an ANOVA for a 2-way crossover design was employed to examine the differences among the 2 forms. Secondly, AUC0-∞ was analyzed on a log scale, to assess bioequivalence between Form I and Form V.p-value: 0.0997ANOVA
Primary

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, where t is the last timepoint with a drug concentration ≥ lowest obtainable quantification (AUC0-τ; ng\*hr/mL).

Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants. Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ST-246 Form IPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ15624.495 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 5449.188
ST-246 Form VPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ20065.316 ng*hr/mLStandard Deviation 6744.974
Comparison: A sample size of 12 subjects was chosen to provide a statistical power of 80% to detect a 25% difference of the Form V mean between the Form I and Form V doses at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for this crossover design. Firstly, a parametric (normal theory) general linear model was applied and an ANOVA for a 2-way crossover design was employed to examine the differences among the 2 forms. Secondly, AUC0-τ was analyzed on a log scale, to assess bioequivalence between Form I and Form V.p-value: 0.0048ANOVA
Primary

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax

Maximum drug concentration in plasma, determined directly from individual concentration-time data (Cmax)

Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants as 'per protocol'. Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ST-246 Form IPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax1068.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 294.3
ST-246 Form VPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax1230.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 348.6
Comparison: A sample size of 12 subjects was chosen to provide a statistical power of 80% to detect a 25% difference of the Form V mean between the Form I and Form V doses at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for this crossover design. Firstly, a parametric (normal theory) general linear model was applied and an ANOVA for a 2-way crossover design was employed to examine the differences among the 2 forms. Secondly, Cmax was analyzed on a log scale, to assess bioequivalence between Form I and Form V.p-value: 0.0422ANOVA
Primary

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½

Mean terminal half-life (t½; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants. Outlier values were excluded from the half-life analyses for 3 subject PK profiles (one Form I and 2 Form V). Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ST-246 Form IPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½27.446 hoursStandard Deviation 13.109
ST-246 Form VPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½28.180 hoursStandard Deviation 21.992
Comparison: A sample size of 12 subjects was chosen to provide a statistical power of 80% to detect a 25% difference of the Form V mean between the Form I and Form V doses at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for this crossover design. A parametric (normal theory) general linear model was applied and an ANOVA for a 2-way crossover design was employed to examine the differences among the 2 forms.p-value: 0.4591ANOVA
Primary

Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax

Time to maximum plasma concentration(Tmax; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants. Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ST-246 Form IPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax3.8 hoursStandard Deviation 1.5
ST-246 Form VPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax3.8 hoursStandard Deviation 1.6
Comparison: A sample size of 12 subjects was chosen to provide a statistical power of 80% to detect a 25% difference of the Form V mean between the Form I and Form V doses at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for this crossover design. A parametric (normal theory) general linear model was applied and an ANOVA for a 2-way crossover design was employed to examine the differences among the 2 forms.p-value: 0.8581ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters

Evaluated safety parameters included: 1. physical examination/vital signs 2. electrocardiograms (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc Bazett) 3. laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis) 4. adverse events For a), b) and c), summary statistics (mean,SD, median, minm, maxm)for values, and changes from baseline(Day 1 pre-dose) to each timepoint, were measured and compared to laboratory normal reference ranges. Values for a)- d) were assigned grades according to DAIDS AE Grading Table. Any Grade of 3 or higher was considered severe and significant.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Both groups started with 12 particpants. Form V group lost a particpant during wash-out period due to death in the family.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ST-246 Form INumber of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters12 participants
ST-246 Form VNumber of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters11 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026