Skip to content

Efficacy and Mechanisms of Pharmacologic Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Efficacy and Mechanisms of Pharmacologic Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00727649
Acronym
FIRM
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-08-04
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

fecal incontinence, adults, diarrhea

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare treatment with fiber and loperamide for fecal incontinence.

Detailed description

Fecal incontinence (FI) affects 4-24% adults in the community and greatly impacts quality of life. Both fiber and loperamide are common, first-line treatments for diarrhea-associated FI in primary care. No known studies exist that compare fiber and loperamide for diarrhea-predominant FI. Further knowledge is needed to define which treatment is more effective and to compare drug tolerability (side effects) for FI. This study will also look at changes in quality of life with treatment and potential mechanisms of drug treatment.

Interventions

2 teaspoons with 8 ounces of liquid daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose)

DRUGLoperamide

1 capsule daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose)

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* weekly fecal incontinence

Exclusion criteria

* fecal impaction * inability to complete a baseline 1-week bowel diary * rectal prolapse * any prior radiation to the pelvis * colo-rectal cancer * rectal fistula * inflammatory bowel disease * neurological diseases (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease) * constipation (\<2 bowel movements/week) or total colectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes6 weeks and 12 weeksAfter consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). The mean number of total fecal incontinence episodes from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point was compared between the groups.
Percentage of Bowel Movements With Incontinence4 weeksAfter consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). We compared the percentage of the total number of fecal incontinence episodes over the total number of bowel movements from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point between the groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIbaseline, 4 week and 12 weeksThe patient-reported symptoms severity score, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), has 4 questions about the frequency of gas, mucus, liquid stool, and solid stool incontinence. Responses are weighted based on the patient rating of severity and a total score is calculated (range 0-61) with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Outpatient medical clinic

Participants by arm

ArmCount
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)
Fiber (psyllium) powder with loperamide placebo first Psyllium powder: 2 teaspoons with 8 ounces of liquid daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose) Loperamide placebo: 2 mg placebo daily with weekly dose adjustments for side-effects and/or efficacy
37
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)
Fiber (psyllium) powder placebo with loperamide 2mg pill Psyllium placebo powder: 2 teaspoons with 8 ounces of liquid daily for 28 days (weekly adjusted dose for side-effects and/or efficacy) Loperamide: 2 mg daily with weekly dose adjustments for side-effects and/or efficacy
43
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention (4-weeks)Lost to Follow-up12
First Intervention (4-weeks)Withdrawal by Subject21
Second Intervention (4-weeks)Death10
Second Intervention (4-weeks)Lost to Follow-up01
Second Intervention (4-weeks)Withdrawal by Subject02
Wash-out (2-weeks)Lost to Follow-up31
Wash-out (2-weeks)Withdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicL1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants22 Participants47 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Age, Continuous59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants37 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants25 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 346 / 403 / 294 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 401 / 290 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence Episodes

After consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). The mean number of total fecal incontinence episodes from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point was compared between the groups.

Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesBaseline7.3 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 6.2
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of First Intervention4.8 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 4.8
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of Wash-out Period4.3 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 4.2
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of Second Intervention3.5 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 6.6
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of Second Intervention4.7 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 5.7
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesBaseline7.9 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 7.5
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of Wash-out Period5.0 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 6.2
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)7-day Bowel Diary, Number of Fecal Incontinence EpisodesEnd of First Intervention4.1 Fecal incontinence episodesStandard Deviation 5.1
Primary

Percentage of Bowel Movements With Incontinence

After consent, 7-day bowel diary was assessed at baseline (2-week visit), during the last week of the 4-week intervention (6-week visit), during the second week of the 2-week wash-out period at 8-weeks, and during the last week of the second 4-week intervention (12 weeks). We compared the percentage of the total number of fecal incontinence episodes over the total number of bowel movements from a 7-day bowel diary from each time point between the groups.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceBaseline30.5 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 18
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of First Intervention23.4 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 22.1
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of Wash-out Period23.0 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 22.2
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of Second Intervention15.9 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 19.3
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of Second Intervention18.8 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 21
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceBaseline32.3 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 23.4
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of Wash-out Period18.8 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 20.2
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Percentage of Bowel Movements With IncontinenceEnd of First Intervention21.3 percentage of incontinent bowel movementStandard Deviation 22.7
Secondary

Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISI

The patient-reported symptoms severity score, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), has 4 questions about the frequency of gas, mucus, liquid stool, and solid stool incontinence. Responses are weighted based on the patient rating of severity and a total score is calculated (range 0-61) with higher scores indicating a greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: baseline, 4 week and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIBaseline29.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIEnd of First Intervention24.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
P1L2 (Psyllium First, Then Loperamide)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIEnd of Second Intervention22.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIBaseline31.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIEnd of First Intervention24.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
L1P2 (Loperamide First, Then Pysllium)Fecal Incontinence Severity Index Score, FISIEnd of Second Intervention23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026