Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Conditions
Keywords
c-Met, Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma(PRC), Sporadic papillary renal cell carcinoma,, Clear cell renal carcinoma, Hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma,
Brief summary
This clinical study is being conducted at multiple sites to determine the best confirmed response rate, safety, and tolerability of GSK1363089 treatment in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Papillary renal cell carcinoma may be classified into hereditary and sporadic forms; subjects with either classification will be accepted into this study.
Interventions
treatment with oral foretinib on one of 2 dosing regimens: 240 mg on a 5 day on / 9 day off schedule every 14 days, or 80 mg on a daily dosing schedule
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of PRC with metastatic disease or bilateral multifocal renal tumors localized to kidneys. Measurable disease, ECOG performance status of \</= 2. * Adequate bone marrow reserve, hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular function.
Exclusion criteria
* Radiation to \>/=25% of bone marrow within 14 days of GSK1363089, more than 1 prior anti-cancer therapy, received prior treatment with a c-met inhibitor, brain metastases, * Any uncontrolled intercurrent illness, * Pregnant or breastfeeding, * HIV positive
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria Version 1.0 | At the end of forth year | Overall response rate is the percentage of participants for whom the best overall response to the study drug was a confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR). Best overall response and its associated confirmation criteria, RECIST; Version 1.0) was based on the Investigator's assessment of the target and non target lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | At the end of forth year | Progression free survival is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of the first occurrence of either tumor progression per RECIST or clinical assessment of progression as assessed by Investigator or Death due to any cause, whichever occurs the first. For participants who did not reach an event (disease progression or death) at the time of data cutoff, PFS was censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement. For participants who did not have any post-baseline tumor assessments, PFS was right censored at Day 1. For any participants who received subsequent anticancer therapy, PFS was right censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment on or prior to the date of anticancer initiation. For any participants, who died or progressed after an extended follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate assessment prior to the extended loss to follow-up. |
| Time to Response (TTR) Over Period | Up to 4 years | Time to response is the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of first response (for participants who had overall responses that were later confirmed as CR/PR). For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the time to response was censored at the date of the last visit. The median time to response was not estimable in either of the dosing cohorts or in the overall safety population using the Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | Up to 4 years | Duration of response is defined as the time between the date of first response (later confirmed CR or confirmed PR) and the date of the first occurrence of one of the events as tumor progression per RECIST as assessed by Investigator, termination of the study drug due to disease progression, death due to any cause, disease progression as documented on the follow-up or participant status form Initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the duration of response was censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement. |
| Duration of Stable Disease (SD) | Up to 4 years | Duration of SD is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of the first occurrence of one of the tumor progression per RECIST as assessed by Investigator, termination of the study drug due to disease progression, death due to disease progression, or disease progression as documented on the follow-up participants status form Initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the duration of stable disease was right censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement. |
| Disease Stabilization Rate Over Period | Up to 4 years | The percentage of participants for whom the best overall response was a confirmed PR, confirmed CR, or stable disease. Exact confidence intervals were obtained using the Clopper-Pearson method. Exact confidence intervals were obtained using the Clopper-Pearson method. |
| Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Up to 4 years | The worst case overall common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade shift post Baseline for each parameter was mentioned. Only worst case scenarios are presented. CTCAE grading was done as per intensity namely mild moderate severe life-threatening or Death. Analysis was done for Alanine aminotransferases (ALT), aspartate aminotransferases (AST), Albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium, sodium, potassium, glucose, amylase, carbon dioxide, phosphate, gamma glutamyl transferases (GGT), and triglycerol lipase. High (H) levels and low (L) levels were measured. |
| Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Up to 4 years | CTCAE gradation The worst case overall CTCAE grade shift post Baseline for each parameter was mentioned. Only worst case scenarios are presented. CTCAE grading was done as per intensity namely mild moderate severe life-threatening or Death. Participants were analyzed for hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, percentage of lymphocytes, and percentage of neutrophils. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Up to 4 years | Adverse event (AE) is an unfavorable change in the health of a participant, including abnormal laboratory findings, that happens during a clinical study or within a certain time period after the study has ended. This change may or may not be caused by the intervention being studied. Serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or extends a current hospital stay, results in an ongoing or significant incapacity or interferes substantially with normal life functions, or causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical events that do not result in death, are not life-threatening, or do not require hospitalization may be considered serious adverse events if they put the participant in danger or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the results listed above. |
| Overall Survival | Up to 4 years | Overall survival, which is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of death (due to any cause). For participants who were alive at the time of data cutoff, duration of overall survival was right censored at the date of last contact. Duration of overall survival = date of death/censoring - date of first dose +1. Percentiles and confidence intervals are calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This study was conducted from 30 June 2006 till 18 August 2010 across 10 centers in the United States (US). A total of 60 participants with papillary renal-cell carcinoma (PRC) were planned to be enrolled.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 74 participants with PRC were enrolled in the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 240 mg on Days 1 to 5 of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. The treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up up to 8 weeks after the last dose of the study drug for tumor assessment. | 37 |
| Daily Dosing Regimen Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 80 mg daily of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up up to 8 weeks after the last dose of the study drug for tumor assessment. | 37 |
| Total | 74 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 9 | 9 |
| Overall Study | Clinical progression | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Metastatic lesions inferred cyst | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant wished to discontinue | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Progressive disease | 23 | 16 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Daily Dosing Regimen | Total | Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.32 | 55.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.06 | 55.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 32 Participants | 64 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 15 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 29 Participants | 59 Participants | 30 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 14 / 37 | 6 / 37 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 37 / 37 | 37 / 37 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 20 / 37 | 22 / 37 |
Outcome results
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria Version 1.0
Overall response rate is the percentage of participants for whom the best overall response to the study drug was a confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR). Best overall response and its associated confirmation criteria, RECIST; Version 1.0) was based on the Investigator's assessment of the target and non target lesions.
Time frame: At the end of forth year
Population: The Safety population included all participants who passed the screening criteria, were enrolled in the study and received at least one dose of the study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria Version 1.0 | 13.5 Percentage of participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria Version 1.0 | 13.5 Percentage of participants |
Disease Stabilization Rate Over Period
The percentage of participants for whom the best overall response was a confirmed PR, confirmed CR, or stable disease. Exact confidence intervals were obtained using the Clopper-Pearson method. Exact confidence intervals were obtained using the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Disease Stabilization Rate Over Period | 91.9 Percentage of participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Disease Stabilization Rate Over Period | 83.8 Percentage of participants |
Duration of Response (DOR)
Duration of response is defined as the time between the date of first response (later confirmed CR or confirmed PR) and the date of the first occurrence of one of the events as tumor progression per RECIST as assessed by Investigator, termination of the study drug due to disease progression, death due to any cause, disease progression as documented on the follow-up or participant status form Initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the duration of response was censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety Population- All Objective Responders (those who did not reach an event by the time of data cut-off as defined in protocol)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Duration of Response (DOR) | 20.50 Months |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Duration of Response (DOR) | 18.46 Months |
Duration of Stable Disease (SD)
Duration of SD is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of the first occurrence of one of the tumor progression per RECIST as assessed by Investigator, termination of the study drug due to disease progression, death due to disease progression, or disease progression as documented on the follow-up participants status form Initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the duration of stable disease was right censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population. All participants with Best overall response, not progressive disease were considered.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Duration of Stable Disease (SD) | 12.88 Months |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Duration of Stable Disease (SD) | 9.26 Months |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths
Adverse event (AE) is an unfavorable change in the health of a participant, including abnormal laboratory findings, that happens during a clinical study or within a certain time period after the study has ended. This change may or may not be caused by the intervention being studied. Serious adverse event (SAE) is an adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or extends a current hospital stay, results in an ongoing or significant incapacity or interferes substantially with normal life functions, or causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Medical events that do not result in death, are not life-threatening, or do not require hospitalization may be considered serious adverse events if they put the participant in danger or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the results listed above.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Any AE | 37 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Any SAE | 20 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Death | 14 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Any AE | 37 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Any SAE | 22 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Deaths | Death | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period
The worst case overall common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade shift post Baseline for each parameter was mentioned. Only worst case scenarios are presented. CTCAE grading was done as per intensity namely mild moderate severe life-threatening or Death. Analysis was done for Alanine aminotransferases (ALT), aspartate aminotransferases (AST), Albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium, sodium, potassium, glucose, amylase, carbon dioxide, phosphate, gamma glutamyl transferases (GGT), and triglycerol lipase. High (H) levels and low (L) levels were measured.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 2 | 8 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 2 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 2 to 1 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 3 | 13 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 2 | 8 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 1 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 1 | 6 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 2 | 4 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 2 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 3 | 4 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 1 to 2 | 6 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 1 | 23 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 10 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 1 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 2 | 8 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 2 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 12 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 1 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 2 | 7 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 1 | 12 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 2 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 1 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 5 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 0 to 1 | 7 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, L, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 3 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, L, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 2 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 16 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 0 to 2 | 6 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Carbon di oxide, Grade 0 to 1 | 11 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 2 | 4 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 1 | 6 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 11 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 2 | 3 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 5 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, H, Grade 0 to 2 | 8 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 3 | 2 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potaasium, H, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 1 | 9 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, H, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 6 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 1 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 1 | 24 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 0 to 1 | 7 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 1 | 9 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, H, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 1 | 21 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALT, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 1 | 12 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 2 | 11 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 0 to 3 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 1 to 2 | 5 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Albumin, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 1 | 16 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 0 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | ALP, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 1 | 6 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Amylase, Grade 2 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 1 | 27 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 2 | 3 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 1 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | AST, Grade 2 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 0 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 1 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Carbon di oxide, Grade 0 to 1 | 9 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 1 | 11 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Creatinine, Grade 1 to 2 | 8 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 0 to 1 | 6 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | GGT, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 2 | 10 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 0 to 3 | 8 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Phosphate, Grade 2 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 1 | 9 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 2 | 6 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 3 | 4 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 0 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Triglycerol lipase, Grade 1 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 14 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 2 | 13 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 11 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 2 | 4 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, L, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, L, Grade 0 to 1 | 14 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, L, Grade 0 to 3 | 6 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Calcium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 10 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 0 to 2 | 4 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 1 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Glucose, H, Grade 2 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 11 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potassium, H, Grade 0 to 2 | 6 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Potaasium, H, Grade 0 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Sodium, H, Grade 0 to 1 | 7 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade of Clinical Chemistry Parameters Over Period | Blilirubin, Grade 0 to 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case)
CTCAE gradation The worst case overall CTCAE grade shift post Baseline for each parameter was mentioned. Only worst case scenarios are presented. CTCAE grading was done as per intensity namely mild moderate severe life-threatening or Death. Participants were analyzed for hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, percentage of lymphocytes, and percentage of neutrophils.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 to 1 | 12 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 to 2 | 3 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 0 to 1 | 5 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 0 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 2 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 1 | 5 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 2 | 4 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 3 | 3 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 1 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 3 | 3 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 3 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 1 | 4 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Platelets, Grade 0 to 1 | 12 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Platelets, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 to 1 | 7 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 1 to 0 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Platelets, Grade 0 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 1 to 2 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 0 to 1 | 10 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Platelets, Grade 0 to 1 | 18 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Leukocytes, Grade 0 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 1 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 2 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 1 | 8 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Platelets, Grade 1 to 2 | 1 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 2 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 1 to 0 | 0 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage lymphocytes, Grade 0 to 3 | 2 Participants |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Number of Participants With Change in CTCAE Grade of Hematological Parameters Over Period (Only Worst Case) | Percentage neutrophils, Grade 0 to 1 | 4 Participants |
Overall Survival
Overall survival, which is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of death (due to any cause). For participants who were alive at the time of data cutoff, duration of overall survival was right censored at the date of last contact. Duration of overall survival = date of death/censoring - date of first dose +1. Percentiles and confidence intervals are calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Overall Survival | NA Months |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Overall Survival | NA Months |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression free survival is defined as the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of the first occurrence of either tumor progression per RECIST or clinical assessment of progression as assessed by Investigator or Death due to any cause, whichever occurs the first. For participants who did not reach an event (disease progression or death) at the time of data cutoff, PFS was censored at the date of the last available tumor measurement. For participants who did not have any post-baseline tumor assessments, PFS was right censored at Day 1. For any participants who received subsequent anticancer therapy, PFS was right censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment on or prior to the date of anticancer initiation. For any participants, who died or progressed after an extended follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate assessment prior to the extended loss to follow-up.
Time frame: At the end of forth year
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 11.56 Months |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 9.07 Months |
Time to Response (TTR) Over Period
Time to response is the time between the date of first dose of study drug and the date of first response (for participants who had overall responses that were later confirmed as CR/PR). For the 6 participants in the daily dosing cohort who did not reach a response as of data cutoff, the time to response was censored at the date of the last visit. The median time to response was not estimable in either of the dosing cohorts or in the overall safety population using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Up to 4 years
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen | Time to Response (TTR) Over Period | NA Months |
| Daily Dosing Regimen | Time to Response (TTR) Over Period | NA Months |