Skip to content

Effects of Losartan Versus Atenolol on Aortic and Cardiac Muscle Stiffness in Adults With Marfan Syndrome

Effects of Losartan vs Atenolol on Aortic Stiffness and Diastolic Function in Adults With Marfan Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00723801
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-07-29
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2014-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Marfan Syndrome

Keywords

Marfan syndrome, Losartan, Atenolol, Diastolic Function, Aortic Stiffness

Brief summary

Marfan syndrome is an inherited connective tissue disorder with morbidity and mortality from aortic dilation and dissection. The degree of aortic dilation and response to beta-blockade (standard of care) vary in adults with Marfan syndrome. However, aortic stiffness is often present, and can be a predictor of aortic dilation and cardiovascular complications. In addition, adults with Marfan syndrome develop left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, which can progress to heart failure. Aortic stiffness and diastolic dysfunction are important and logical therapeutic targets in adults with Marfan syndrome. TGF-beta mediates disease pathogenesis in Marfan syndrome and contributes to aortic stiffness. The angiotensin receptor blocker, losartan, inhibits TGF-beta activity and reverses aortic wall pathology in a Marfan mouse model. Losartan also decreases aortic stiffness and improves diastolic function in hypertension, renal disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This trial is a randomized, double-blind trial of 50 adults with Marfan syndrome, treated with 6 months of atenolol vs. losartan. Arterial tonometry for aortic stiffness and echocardiography for diastolic function will be performed at the beginning and end of treatment. A blood draw for serum markers of extracellular matrix turnover and inflammation will also be performed at 0 and 6 months. We plan to determine whether losartan decreases aortic stiffness and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction significantly more than atenolol.

Detailed description

Please See Summary.

Interventions

DRUGAtenolol

Atenolol 50mg PO QD

DRUGLosartan

Losartan 100mg PO QD

Sponsors

Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than 25 years * Clinical Marfan Syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Previous aortic or cardiac surgery * Pregnancy * Renal Insufficiency * Medication intolerance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aortic Biophysical Properties - Pulse Wave VelocityBaseline and 6 monthsAortic stiffness was assessed using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®, AtCor Medical, West Ryde, NSW, Sydney, Australia) to measure carotid to femoral artery pulse wave velocity (PWV). With the patient lying supine in a quiet environment, a handheld micromanometer-tipped probe was applied to the skin surface over the carotid and femoral arteries, compressing the vessel wall so that transmural forces within the vessel wall were perpendicular to the arterial surface. The distance from the sternal notch to the sites of carotid and femoral pulse acquisition were measured and inputted into the device to represent the relative distance from the carotid to femoral artery. The calculation of distance divided by time of pulse upstroke relative to the upstroke of the QRS on a 3 lead surface EKG was used by the device to calculate velocity. All recorded measurements met the manufacturer's quality control standards integrated into the software package.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diastolic Function - Ejection FractionBaseline and 6 monthsTwo-dimensional echocardiography was performed using a 3.0 MHz transducer (General Electric VIVID 7). Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions were determined in parasternal long axis views. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated using the modified Simpsons calculation in the apical two and four chamber views.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Randomized to Atenolol
Atenolol: Atenolol 50mg PO QD
17
Subjects Randomized to Losartan
Losartan: Losartan 100mg PO QD
17
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects Randomized to AtenololSubjects Randomized to LosartanTotal
Age, Continuous34 years36 years35 years
Ejection Fraction60 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
62 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
61 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Pulse wave velocity7.5 meters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
7.6 meters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
7.55 meters/second
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Aortic Biophysical Properties - Pulse Wave Velocity

Aortic stiffness was assessed using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®, AtCor Medical, West Ryde, NSW, Sydney, Australia) to measure carotid to femoral artery pulse wave velocity (PWV). With the patient lying supine in a quiet environment, a handheld micromanometer-tipped probe was applied to the skin surface over the carotid and femoral arteries, compressing the vessel wall so that transmural forces within the vessel wall were perpendicular to the arterial surface. The distance from the sternal notch to the sites of carotid and femoral pulse acquisition were measured and inputted into the device to represent the relative distance from the carotid to femoral artery. The calculation of distance divided by time of pulse upstroke relative to the upstroke of the QRS on a 3 lead surface EKG was used by the device to calculate velocity. All recorded measurements met the manufacturer's quality control standards integrated into the software package.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Randomized to AtenololAortic Biophysical Properties - Pulse Wave Velocity-1.15 change in meters/secondStandard Deviation 1.68
Subjects Randomized to LosartanAortic Biophysical Properties - Pulse Wave Velocity-0.22 change in meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.59
Secondary

Diastolic Function - Ejection Fraction

Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed using a 3.0 MHz transducer (General Electric VIVID 7). Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions were determined in parasternal long axis views. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated using the modified Simpsons calculation in the apical two and four chamber views.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Randomized to AtenololDiastolic Function - Ejection Fraction1.31 Change in % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 4.07
Subjects Randomized to LosartanDiastolic Function - Ejection Fraction1.57 Change in % ejection fractionStandard Deviation 8.29

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026