Skip to content

Lamictal as Add-on Treatment for Bipolar I Disorder in Pediatric Patients

The Evaluation of Lamictal as an Add-on Treatment for Bipolar I Disorder in Children and Adolescents, 10 to 17 Years of Age

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00723450
Enrollment
301
Registered
2008-07-28
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2017-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder

Keywords

Bipolar I pediatric lamictal adolescent

Brief summary

The study will be a multi-center, parallel, group, placebo control, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of lamictal as add-on maintenance treatment in pediatric outpatients (aged 10 to 17 years) diagnosed with Bipolar I disorder. The study consists of 4 phases: Screen (approximately 2 weeks), Open label phase (up to 18 weeks), Randomized phase (up to 36 weeks) and Taper and follow-up phase (up to 4 weeks).

Interventions

Flexible Dosing

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is male or female between the ages of 10 and 17 years, inclusive. * Subject has a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder and is currently experiencing a manic/hypomanic, depressed, or mixed mood episode * Subject is currently receiving a stable treatment regimen. * Subject is living with his/her custodial parent(s) or legal guardian(s) and has contact with them on a daily basis.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has been diagnosed with a primary Axis I disorder (with the exception of bipolar I disorder, ADHD, anxiety disorders, oppositional defiant disorder, or conduct disorder) or any Axis II disorder. * Subject currently has signs or symptoms of psychosis or a history of psychosis within the previous four weeks. * Subject has been diagnosed with epilepsy, autism, Asperger's syndrome, or Tourette's syndrome. * Subject has experienced a serious rash, such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, or a rash otherwise requiring hospitalization. * Subject has experienced a rash related to prior LAMICTAL use, or for whom LAMICTAL treatment was discontinued for clinically significant safety reasons. * Subject has received any antidepressant medication, or atomoxetine, during the four weeks prior to the Screen Visit. * Subject has initiated psychotherapy within 2 months prior to the Screen Visit, or plans to initiate psychotherapy during the trial. * Subject in the 10-12 year old age group has a Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal 15 or greater than or equal to 30; a subject in the 13-17 year old age group has a BMI less than or equal to 17 or greater than or equal to 34. * Subject tests positive for illicit drug use at the Screen Visit, has a history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than nicotine dependence) within the past three months, or has a positive blood alcohol level at the Screen Visit. * Subject, in the investigator's judgment, poses a current homicidal or serious suicidal risk, has made a suicide attempt within the twelve months preceding the Screen Visit, has ever been homicidal.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)From randomization until Week 36TOBE was defined by the first prescription of any additional pharmacotherapy to treat bipolar symptoms, increasing the dose(s) of the participants conventional bipolar medication(s), treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, or moving the participant to a more restricted environment for observation, safety, or treatment; or participant withdrawal from the study due to a bipolar-related adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE); or participants withdrawal from the study due to lack of efficacy as defined by rating scale threshold scores. TOBE was calculated using a log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)From randomization until intervention administered for a mood episode (up to Week 36)The time from randomization to the intervention for a mood episode (depression, mania/hypomania or mixed mood) was analyzed. TIME was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
Time From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)From randomization until intervention administered for depression, mania/hypomania or a mixed episode (up to Week 36)The time from randomization to intervention for depression (TIDep), mania/hypomania (TIMan), or a mixed episode (TIMix) was analyzed. TIDep, TIMan, and TIMix were calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateFrom randomization until a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state (up to Week 36)The number of participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state were analyzed.
Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseFrom randomization up to Week 36The proportion of participants (par.) requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms, that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state at any time within the first 30, 90, and 180 days in the Randomized Phase were analyzed.
Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Time From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)From randomization until withdrawal from the study for any cause (up to Week 36)The time from randomization to the withdrawal from study was analyzed. TTW was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).
Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseRandomization weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: Compared to the Baseline assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?. Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).
Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: Compared to the Randomization assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?. Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseRandomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Change From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Randomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.
Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP (I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 301 participants were enrolled in the study, of which 298 subjects took at least one dose of lamotrigine (LTG). One hundred and seventy three participants met stabilization criteria and entered the Randomized Phase.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a 2-week Screening Phase, an 18-week Open-Label Phase, a 36-week Double-Blind Randomized Phase and a Taper and Follow-up Phase (up to 4 weeks depending on the dose the participant was taking at the last Open-Label or Randomized Phase visit), which was either open-label or double-blind depending on the phase of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo in the evening for participants taking one dose and for participants taking two divided doses, one dose in the morning and one dose in the evening, for a duration of up to 36 weeks.
86
Lamotrigine
Participants received LTG equivalent to the dose established in the Open-Label Phase. Participants received LTG tablets in the evening for participants taking one dose and for participants taking two divided doses, one dose in the morning and one dose in the evening, for a duration of up to 36 weeks.
87
Total173

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Open-Label PhaseAdverse Event2600
Open-Label PhaseLack of Efficacy1800
Open-Label PhaseLost to Follow-up700
Open-Label PhasePhysician Decision200
Open-Label PhaseProtocol Violation3500
Open-Label PhaseWithdrawal by Subject3700
Randomized PhaseAdverse Event02617
Randomized PhaseLack of Efficacy01111
Randomized PhaseLost to Follow-up023
Randomized PhasePhysician Decision031
Randomized PhaseProtocol Violation0913
Randomized PhaseWithdrawal by Subject01422

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLamotriginePlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous13.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
13.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22
13.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27
Gender
Female
33 Participants39 Participants72 Participants
Gender
Male
54 Participants47 Participants101 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
71 Participants71 Participants142 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
177 / 29841 / 8645 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 2985 / 861 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Time From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)

TOBE was defined by the first prescription of any additional pharmacotherapy to treat bipolar symptoms, increasing the dose(s) of the participants conventional bipolar medication(s), treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, or moving the participant to a more restricted environment for observation, safety, or treatment; or participant withdrawal from the study due to a bipolar-related adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE); or participants withdrawal from the study due to lack of efficacy as defined by rating scale threshold scores. TOBE was calculated using a log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time frame: From randomization until Week 36

Population: Randomized Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized to LTG or placebo and received at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Depression, n=22,2150 DaysStandard Error 3.8
PlaceboTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37120 DaysStandard Error 12.2
PlaceboTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29107 DaysStandard Error 13.8
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Depression, n=22,21155 DaysStandard Error 14.7
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37163 DaysStandard Error 12.2
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to the Occurrence of a Bipolar Event (TOBE)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29136 DaysStandard Error 15.4
p-value: 0.0717Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 1-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 2-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 3-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 5-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 14-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 15-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 17-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 6-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 7-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 9-1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 10-1.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 11-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 13-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-4.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-6.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-8.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-6.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-4.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-7.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-8.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-9.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT population: all participants who entered the Open-Label Phase and received at least one dose of LTG.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 1-2.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 2-2.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-3.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 5-4.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 10-6.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 11-6.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-6.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 13-6.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 14-6.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 15-6.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 3-3.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 6-4.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 7-5.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-4.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 9-5.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-6.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 17-6.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-6.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-4.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-5.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-4.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label Phase

The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 3-6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4-6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 15-12.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16-12.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 1-3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 2-4.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 5-7.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 6-8.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 7-9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8-8.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 9-9.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 10-10.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 11-11.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12-11.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 13-12.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 14-12.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 17-12.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18-12.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.43
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase

Severity of the bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(S) score which had a range from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 10.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 160.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 20.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 30.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 40.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 60.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 80.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 100.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 120.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 200.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 240.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 280.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 320.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 360.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 80.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 120.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 280.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 360.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 10.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 100.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 20.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 240.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 30.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 160.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 40.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 320.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 60.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP[S]) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 200.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.

The CGI-P is a 10-item scale used to assess attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years of age. The scale is composed of two factors: restless-impulsive behavior and emotional lability. Each item was scored on a 0-3 scale. The range of scores for the CGI-P is 0 (best possible outcome) to 30 (worst possible outcome). The CGI-P was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 83.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 322.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 163.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 242.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 361.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 360.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 243.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 322.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.08
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 82.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Conners' Global Index - Parent Version (CGI-P) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase.Week 161.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase

The P-YMRS was adapted from the YMRS for completion by parents of the pediatric participants with bipolar disorder in order to assess the severity of the manic symptoms. The P-YMRS consisted of 11 items and had a total score range of 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The P-YMRS was completed by the participant's custodial parent or legal guardian. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 162.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 325.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 84.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 365.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 245.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 364.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 162.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 245.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 326.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Parent Version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (P-YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 84.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase

The QIDS-A17-C is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 81.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 321.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 31.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 10.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 101.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 41.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 162.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 21.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 121.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 241.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 61.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 201.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 281.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.61
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 362.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 282.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 21.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 41.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 81.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 202.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 241.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 10.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 361.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 30.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 61.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 101.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 121.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 161.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Interview, Semi-structured, Adolescent Version (QIDS- A17-C) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 321.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase

The QIDS-A17-SR is a 17-item scale used to assess depression severity in adolescents according to the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode; it is a modified version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) used for adults. Each item is scored on a 0-3 scale, yielding 9 domain scores. The range of scores is 0 (best possible outcome) to 27 (worst possible outcome). The scale is completed by the participant. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 360.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 81.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 161.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 241.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 320.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 320.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 241.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 81.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 360.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-report Adolescent Version (QIDS-A17-SR) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 161.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Secondary

Change From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized Phase

The YMRS consists of 11 items and is based on the participant's report of their mania symptoms. It is clinician rated. Four items (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior) are rated on a scale of 0 to 8, while the other seven items (elevated mood, increased motor activity-energy, sexual interest, sleep, language, appearance, and insight) are rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The range of scores for the YMRS is 0 (best possible outcome) to 60 (worst possible outcome). The YMRS was completed by the investigator or their qualified designee. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 22.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 32.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 103.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 284.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.04
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 324.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 11.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 43.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 64.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 84.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 123.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 164.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 204.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.99
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 244.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.06
PlaceboChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 363.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 163.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.89
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 22.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 62.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 31.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 242.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.02
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 121.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.81
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 83.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 283.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 102.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 322.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 204.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.92
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 10.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 361.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
LamotrigineChange From Randomization in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at Each Visit in the Randomized PhaseWeek 42.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Secondary

Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label Phase

The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: Compared to the Baseline assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?. Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X). Different par. may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of par. analyzed reflects everyone in the Open-Label Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 14, n=297211 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 1, n=29727 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 2, n=29746 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 3, n=29772 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 4, n=29786 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 5, n=297113 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 6, n=297124 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 7, n=297138 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 8, n=297140 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 9, n=297159 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 10, n=297176 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 11, n=297182 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 12, n=297195 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 13, n=297205 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 15, n=297210 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 16, n=297209 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 17, n=297208 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Baseline in the Open-Label PhaseWeek 18, n=297206 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized Phase

The CGI-BP(I) asks the following question: Compared to the Randomization assessment in this trial, how much has the participant changed?. Scores on the CGI-I range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator or their designee rated improvement regardless of whether the improvement to be due to drug treatment. Improvement defined as CGI-BP(I)=1 (improved) or 2 (very much improved). Missing data imputed using last-observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame: Randomization and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 131 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1221 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 324 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1621 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1022 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2021 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 422 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2421 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2822 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 225 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 3219 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 620 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 3620 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 822 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 3613 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1012 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2415 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 131 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 222 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 321 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 419 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 819 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1217 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 1616 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2014 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 2815 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 3215 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Considered Much Improved or Very Much Improved [Defined as a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version, Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP[I]), Score of 1 or 2] at Each Visit Compared to Randomization in the Randomized PhaseWeek 623 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood State

The number of participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state were analyzed.

Time frame: From randomization until a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state (up to Week 36)

Population: Randomized ITT Population. Only those participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of, or a change, in bipolar symptoms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateDepression5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateMania/hypomania16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateMixed episode state10 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateDepression3 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateMania/hypomania6 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence to Depression, Mania/Hypomania, or Mixed Mood StateMixed episode state9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized Phase

The proportion of participants (par.) requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of or a change in bipolar symptoms, that is, experiencing a relapse/recurrence to depression, mania/hypomania, or mixed mood state at any time within the first 30, 90, and 180 days in the Randomized Phase were analyzed.

Time frame: From randomization up to Week 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population. Only those participants requiring intervention to treat either the emergence of, or a change, in bipolar symptoms were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 90 days, n=16, 612 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 180 days, n= 10, 910 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 30 days, n= 10, 93 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 30 days, n=16, 69 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 180 days, n=16, 616 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 90 days, n=5, 35 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 30 days, n=5, 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 180 days, n=5, 35 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 90 days, n= 10, 97 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 180 days, n=5, 33 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 90 days, n=16, 64 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 180 days, n=16, 65 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 30 days, n=5, 31 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 30 days, n= 10, 92 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 90 days, n= 10, 96 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMixed mood state, 180 days, n= 10, 98 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseDepression, 90 days, n=5, 32 Participants
LamotrigineNumber of Participants Experiencing a Relapse/Recurrence Within the First 30, 90, and 180 Days in the Randomized PhaseMania/hypomania, 30 days, n=16, 62 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label Phase

Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP (I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18

Population: Open-Label ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X). Different par. may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of par. analyzed reflects everyone in the Open-Label Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 1, n=2903.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 2, n=2783.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 4, n=2653.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 5, n=2582.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 7, n=2462.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 8, n=2362.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 9, n=2272.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 17, n=422.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 18, n=282.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 3, n=2703.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 6, n=2432.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 10, n=2052.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 11, n=1812.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 12, n=1682.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 13, n=1411.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 14, n=1181.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 15, n=931.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Open-label PhaseWeek 16, n=722.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Summary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized Phase

Improvement of bipolar illness was based on the CGI-BP(I) score which ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures.

Time frame: Randomization weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36

Population: Randomized ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X). Different par. may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of par. analyzed reflects everyone in the Randomized ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 1, n=84, 853.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 12, n=45, 493.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 3, n=74, 753.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 16, n=43, 503.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 6, n=58, 643.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 20, n=37, 433.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 4, n=65, 703.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 24, n=34, 363.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 8, n=51, 603.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 28, n=29, 322.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 2, n=82, 813.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 32, n=28, 273.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 36, n=27, 243.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
PlaceboSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 10, n=45, 553.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 36, n=27, 243.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 6, n=58, 643.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 32, n=28, 273.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 1, n=84, 853.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 2, n=82, 813.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 3, n=74, 753.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 8, n=51, 603.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 10, n=45, 553.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 12, n=45, 493.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 16, n=43, 503.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 20, n=37, 433.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 24, n=34, 363.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 28, n=29, 323.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
LamotrigineSummary of Clinical Global Impressions - Bipolar - Improvement of Illness (CGI-BP [I]) Scores During Randomized PhaseWeek 4, n=65, 703.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)

The time from randomization to the intervention for a mood episode (depression, mania/hypomania or mixed mood) was analyzed. TIME was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time frame: From randomization until intervention administered for a mood episode (up to Week 36)

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Depression, n=22, 2162 DaysStandard Error 5.2
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37129 DaysStandard Error 11.7
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29120 DaysStandard Error 13.7
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Depression, n=22, 21164 DaysStandard Error 12.7
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37179 DaysStandard Error 10.8
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for a Mood Episode (TIME)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29127 DaysStandard Error 12
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)

The time from randomization to intervention for depression (TIDep), mania/hypomania (TIMan), or a mixed episode (TIMix) was analyzed. TIDep, TIMan, and TIMix were calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time frame: From randomization until intervention administered for depression, mania/hypomania or a mixed episode (up to Week 36)

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29160 DaysStandard Error 10.7
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Depression, n=22, 2174 DaysStandard Error 3.9
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37139 DaysStandard Error 11.5
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Depression, n=22, 2161 DaysStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37NA Days
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Mixed Mood, n=28, 2959 DaysStandard Error 2.6
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29105 DaysStandard Error 7.3
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Depression, n=22, 2137 DaysStandard Error 1.3
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37135 DaysStandard Error 6.3
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37194 DaysStandard Error 7.5
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37NA Days
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Depression, n=22, 21182 Days
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Depression, n=22, 21158 Days
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 3761 DaysStandard Error 2.1
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMan: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29148 DaysStandard Error 8.5
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIMix: Mixed Mood, n=28, 2957 DaysStandard Error 2.5
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29159 Days
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Intervention for Depression (TIDep), Mania/Hypomania (TIMan), or a Mixed Episode (TIMix)TIDep: Depression, n=22, 2146 DaysStandard Error 1.5
Secondary

Time From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)

The time from randomization to the withdrawal from study was analyzed. TTW was calculated using the log rank test with stratification for index mood state (depression, mania/hypomania, mixed mood).

Time frame: From randomization until withdrawal from the study for any cause (up to Week 36)

Population: Randomized ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37138 DaysStandard Error 17.3
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29101 DaysStandard Error 15.7
PlaceboTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Depression, n=22, 21113 DaysStandard Error 21.4
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Mania/Hypomania, n=36, 37144 DaysStandard Error 15.6
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Mixed Mood, n=28, 29106 DaysStandard Error 16.3
LamotrigineTime From Randomization to Withdrawal From the Study for Any Cause (TTW)Stratum: Depression, n=22, 21141 DaysStandard Error 20

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026