Skip to content

Cormet Post-PMA Study: New Enrollment

Cormet Hip Resurfacing System Post-PMA Study Group (New Enrollment)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00722007
Acronym
PASNew
Enrollment
147
Registered
2008-07-25
Start date
2008-04-24
Completion date
2014-05-12
Last updated
2019-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

hip resurfacing, osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Cormet Hip Resurfacing implant system in the post-approval environment.

Detailed description

This study tracks the performance of the Cormet Hip Resurfacing system in the post-approval environment to see if there are significant changes in device performance from the pre-market IDE setting as compared to the post-approval setting. Specifically this study will compare the proportion of subjects achieving a Month 24 composite clinical success (CCS) criterion and 24 month cumulative revision rate among the newly enrolled post-approval study subjects to the IDE subjects' performance on CCS as reported in the Pre-Market Application (PMA).

Interventions

DEVICECormet Hip Resurfacing

Cormet Hip Resurfacing implant

Sponsors

Corin
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patient who meets eligibility criteria consistent with product labeling * skeletally mature * mentally capable of completing follow-up forms * Will be available for follow-up out to 2 years and annually thereafter until the last patient reaches the two-year evaluation * Has been deemed a candidate for hip replacement by diagnosis of the investigator * consented to participate in the clinical study

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with active or suspected infection in or around the hip joint; * Patient with bone stock inadequate to support the device * Patient with severe osteopenia * Patient with a family history of severe osteoporosis or severe osteopenia; * Patient with osteonecrosis or avascular necrosis (AVN) with \>50% involvement of the femoral head (regardless of FICAT Grade) * Patient with multiple cysts of the femoral head (\>1cm) * In cases of questionable bone stock, a DEXA scan may be necessary to assess inadequate bone stock. * Patient with any vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease severe enough to compromise implant stability or postoperative recovery; * Female of child-bearing age due to unknown effects on the fetus of metal ion release. * Patient with known moderate or severe renal insufficiency; * Patient who is immunosuppressed with diseases such as AIDS or person receiving high doses of corticosteroids; * Patient who is severely overweight; * Patient with known or suspected metal sensitivity (e.g., jewelry).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Unilateral Procedures Which Achieved Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at Month 24Month 24+Composite Clinical Success (CCS) is based upon the following: There has been no revision, removal, or replacement of any device component on or prior to the exact 24 month anniversary (i.e., relative day 730); and Month 24 Harris Hip Total score (HHS) ≥ 80 points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Month 24+All unilateral and bilateral implants have been assessed using the following grading: Total HHS: Excellent (90-100); Good (80-89); Fair (70-79); Poor (\<70) Pain HHS: None; Slight; Mild; Moderate; Marked; Totally Disabled Function HHS: Normal (40-47); Mild Dysfunction (30=\<39); Moderate Dysfunction (20=\<29); Severe Dysfunction (10=\<19); Disabled (0=\<9)
Survival Rate Using Kaplan-Meier Survival CurvesMonth 24+Kaplan-Meier survival curves were completed for all implants (unilateral & bilateral) for Month 24
Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Device Related Adverse EventsMonth 24+
The Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyMonth 24+The following was assessed: Radiolucency Acetabular Component: I; II; III Radiolucency Femoral Component: Superior; Tip; Inferior Cup Migration and Tilt: Superior/Inferior Migration \> 4mm; Medial/Lateral Migration \> 4mm; Varus/Valgus Tilt \> 4 degrees Stem Migration and Tilt: Subsidence of Femoral Component \> 4mm and Stem tilting \> 4 degrees Other Assessments: Anteversion of the Head ≥ 5mm; Retroversion of the Head ≥ 5 mm; Hypertrophy in Any Zone; Resorption in Any Zone; Lysis in Any Zone; Osteolysis

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 24 Apr 2008 and 21 Dec 2011, 147 participants were enrolled in 6 study hospitals, with 160 Cormet resurfacing implants in 134 unilateral and 13 bilateral procedures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA Group
Cormet Resurfacing Hip System implanted after pre-market approval
147
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA Group
Cormet Resurfacing Hip System implanted after pre-market approval
160
Total307

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA Group
Age, Continuous52.4 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
147 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Implants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
147 Implants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 147
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 147
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 147

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Unilateral Procedures Which Achieved Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at Month 24

Composite Clinical Success (CCS) is based upon the following: There has been no revision, removal, or replacement of any device component on or prior to the exact 24 month anniversary (i.e., relative day 730); and Month 24 Harris Hip Total score (HHS) ≥ 80 points.

Time frame: Month 24+

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Unilateral Procedures Which Achieved Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at Month 24104 Implants
Secondary

Number of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+

All unilateral and bilateral implants have been assessed using the following grading: Total HHS: Excellent (90-100); Good (80-89); Fair (70-79); Poor (\<70) Pain HHS: None; Slight; Mild; Moderate; Marked; Totally Disabled Function HHS: Normal (40-47); Mild Dysfunction (30=\<39); Moderate Dysfunction (20=\<29); Severe Dysfunction (10=\<19); Disabled (0=\<9)

Time frame: Month 24+

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Total HHS Excellent (90-100)109 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Total HHS Good (80-89)10 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Total HHS Fair (70-79)6 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Total HHS Poor (<70)1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Total HHS missing2 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS None87 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS Slight28 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS Mild8 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS Moderate4 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS Marked0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS Totally Disabled0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Pain HHS missing1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Function HHS Normal (40-47)127 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Function HHS Mild Dysfunction (30=<39)1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Function HHS Moderate Dysfunction (20=<29)0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Function HHS Severe Dysfunction (10=<19)0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Implants (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Harris Hip Scores (HHS) Components Including Total, Pain & Function Scored at Month 24+Function HHS Disabled (0=<9)0 Implants
Secondary

Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Device Related Adverse Events

Time frame: Month 24+

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupNumber of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Device Related Adverse Events9 Implants
Secondary

Survival Rate Using Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were completed for all implants (unilateral & bilateral) for Month 24

Time frame: Month 24+

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupSurvival Rate Using Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves155 Implants
Secondary

The Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post Operatively

The following was assessed: Radiolucency Acetabular Component: I; II; III Radiolucency Femoral Component: Superior; Tip; Inferior Cup Migration and Tilt: Superior/Inferior Migration \> 4mm; Medial/Lateral Migration \> 4mm; Varus/Valgus Tilt \> 4 degrees Stem Migration and Tilt: Subsidence of Femoral Component \> 4mm and Stem tilting \> 4 degrees Other Assessments: Anteversion of the Head ≥ 5mm; Retroversion of the Head ≥ 5 mm; Hypertrophy in Any Zone; Resorption in Any Zone; Lysis in Any Zone; Osteolysis

Time frame: Month 24+

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Acetabular Component - I1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Acetabular Component - II1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Acetabular Component - III1 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Femoral Component - Superior0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Femoral Component - Tip0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRadiolucency Femoral Component - Inferior0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelySuperior/Inferior Cup Migration > 4mm0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyMedial/Lateral Cup Migration > 4mm0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyVarus/Valgus Cup Tilt > 4 degrees0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyStem subsidence of > 4mm and stem tilt of > 4°0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyAnteversion of the Head ≥ 5mm0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyRetroversion of the Head ≥ 5 mm0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyHypertrophy in Any Zone0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyResorption in Any Zone0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyLysis in Any Zone0 Implants
Cormet Hip Resurfacing Post-PMA GroupThe Number of Procedures (Unilateral & Bilateral) With Any Radiographic Findings at Month 24 Post OperativelyOsteolysis0 Implants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026