Head and Neck Neoplasms, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Mouth Neoplasms, Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
Positron-Emission Tomography, radiation therapy, cisplatin, chemotherapy, FLT
Brief summary
This is an imaging protocol only, not a therapeutic study. The primary goal of the proposed study is to examine the utility of a new imaging study, Positron Emission Tomography with F-18 Fluorothymidine (FLT PET), in the early treatment evaluation of head and neck cancer. FLT uptake in the tumor correlates with the rate of cell proliferation. It is therefore hoped that changes in tumor FLT uptake after therapy will reflect change in the number of actively dividing tumor cells and will provide early assessment of treatment response. Research subjects will undergo one PET scan with FLT. The scan is done prior to any therapeutic intervention (radiation or chemotherapy) can be obtained up to 30 days prior to the start of therapy. The uptake of FLT in the tumor will be analyzed to see if it can be used as a predictor of treatment efficacy and/or outcome. There is an optional biopsy component to this study. Should the attending physicians (primarily the otolaryngologists) believe that the subject can safely undergo an outpatient biopsy, and the subject agrees, a biopsy is performed. The biopsy will be done within 30 days prior to treatment, similar to FLT PET scans. Tissue from the biopsy will be analyzed for markers of cellular proliferation and these markers will be correlated with the findings of FLT PET scan. There will be a 2-year clinical follow-up to assess for treatment outcomes, local control, and overall survival.
Detailed description
There are approximately 40,000 new cases of head and neck cancer each year in the United States. Approximately two thirds of these patients present with locally advanced disease with either large disease at the primary site and/or spread to regional lymph node levels. Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, usually applied in combination for advanced disease. Despite aggressive treatment, the 5-year survival for locally advanced disease remains poor (overall, approximately 50%). To increase the efficacy of locoregional therapy, different treatment maneuvers are used including increased radiation dose, concurrent use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy and high dose intra-arterial chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the increased intensity of combined treatment also leads to greater treatment related morbidity and mortality. It is currently difficult to predict who will benefit from intensive chemoradiotherapy and who would be most effectively treated with other combinations such as surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. It is predictable that the most immediate signal of a successful antitumor therapeutic regime will be a decrease in cellular proliferation in the tumor. Therefore, a tracer, which is taken up into and retained in cells as a function of their proliferative activity, should provide rapid information as to the effectiveness of the treatment. FLT is an ideal tracer in this setting as its uptake is a function of thymidine kinase activity. Thymidine kinase activity is an established marker of cellular proliferation. FLT can be imaged with a PET scanner and the FLT uptake in the tumor can be reliably quantified. Preliminary studies including at our institution also confirm accumulation of FLT in untreated head and neck cancers. The objective of our study is to evaluate the utility of FLT PET imaging in predicting the outcome of treatment in terms of locoregional control and disease-free survival in patients (i.e., progression free survival) with head and neck cancer as well as overall survival.
Interventions
DRUG18F-Fluorothymidine PET scan
18F-Fluorothymidine (0.04 - 0.08 mCi / kg to a maximum dose of 5 mCi) administered once intravenously for a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.
Sponsors
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
University of Iowa
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document. * Subject must have histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. * Subject must be scheduled to receive combined chemo-radiotherapy treatment for their standard cancer care. Treatment decisions will be made by the treating otolaryngologist, radiation, and medical oncologists. * Male or females ≥ 18 years of age. Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck is exceedingly rare in children and not generally applicable to the pediatric population. * Karnofsky greater than or equal to 60% at time of screening. * Life expectancy of greater than 6 months. * Subject must have normal organ and marrow function (as defined below) within 30 days of study enrollment: * leukocytes ≥ 3,000/μL * absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/μL * platelets ≥ 100,000/μL * total bilirubin ≤ 1.0 mg/dl\* * Either AST OR ALT ≤ 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * creatinine ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal * PT and PTT (if biopsy is to be performed) \< 2.0 X upper normal limits * The effects of FLT on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. A screening urine hCG will be administered in the Nuclear Medicine to women of childbearing potential before each FLT scan and pregnant women will not be accepted as subjects in this study.
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier. * Subject may not be receiving any other investigational agents. * Subject with a Karnofsky score of below 60. * Pregnant women are excluded from this study. FLT PET has potential for teratogenic effects. Because there are potentially unknown risks for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with FLT, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is imaged with FLT and may not resume for 48 hours after the FLT imaging. * Subjects taking nucleoside analog medications such as those used as antiretroviral agents.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT. |
| Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis. |
| Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT. |
| Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis. |
| Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) Between Scan 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT. |
| Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis. |
| Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS). | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat).Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT. |
| Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis. |
| Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
| Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 36 months | Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| FLT PET Subjects who receive F-18 Fluorothymidine \[FLT\]PET imaging prior to treatment.
F-18 Fluorothymidine: FLT PET scan \[0.04 to 0.08 mCi/kg (maximum of 5 mCi +/- 10%)\] | 26 |
| Total | 26 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 |
| Overall Study | withdraw by subject after scan 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | FLT PET |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 21 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 57.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 19 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 23 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 26 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 24 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 6 / 26 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 26 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 26 |
Outcome results
Primary
Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS).
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat).Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS). | 0.04 mL/g/min | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
p-value: 0.67Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.11Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 0.04 mL/g/min | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
p-value: 0.89Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.42Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate K-FLT, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 0.07 mL/g/min | Standard Deviation 0.03 |
p-value: 0.92Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.84Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. FLT uptake in the tumor is a dynamic process that involves facilitated diffusion in and out of the cell and molecular changes in FLT. The rate, measured in mL/g/min, is a composite of the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue and the transfer from tissue back into the blood, as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of FLT Flux (K-FLT) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 0.07 mL/g/min | Standard Deviation 0.03 |
p-value: 0.73Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.88Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 3.85 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
p-value: 0.48Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.28Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Maximum Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 3.85 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
p-value: 0.58Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.36Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 6.36 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
p-value: 0.06Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.04Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Maximum Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 6.36 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
p-value: 0.05Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.02Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 2.53 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
p-value: 0.55Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.35Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mean Mid-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.53 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
p-value: 0.63Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.46Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 4.23 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
p-value: 0.09Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.06Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mean Pre-therapy FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 4.23 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
p-value: 0.08Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.04Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 101.26 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 76.91 |
p-value: <0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.03Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Mid-therapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 101.26 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 76.91 |
p-value: 0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.07Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | -0.33 percentage change in K-FLT | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
p-value: 0.99Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.84Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in FLT Flux (K-FLT) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | -0.33 percentage change in K-FLT | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
p-value: 0.9Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.87Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | -0.39 percentage change in SUVmax | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
p-value: 0.24Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.27Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in Maximum FLT Uptake (SUVmax) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | -0.39 percentage change in SUVmax | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
p-value: 0.37Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.46Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) Between Scan 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) Between Scan 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | -0.39 percentage change in SUVmean | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
p-value: 0.18Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.25Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in Mean FLT Uptake (SUVmean) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | -0.39 percentage change in SUVmean | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
p-value: 0.26Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.46Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | -0.34 percentage change | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
p-value: 0.17Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.18Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change in the Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | -0.34 percentage change | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
p-value: 0.2Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.24Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Between Scans 1 & 2 in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | -0.51 percentage change in K-Patlak | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
p-value: 0.41Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.69Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent both the pre-therapy and mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Percent Change the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | -0.51 percentage change in K-Patlak | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
p-value: 0.36Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.63Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 47.86 mm^3 (cubic milimeters) | Standard Deviation 32.49 |
p-value: <0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: <0.01Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Metabolic tumor volume using the FLT PET tracer. Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Pre-therapy Metabolic Tumor Volume in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 47.86 mm^3 (cubic milimeters) | Standard Deviation 32.49 |
p-value: <0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.02Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 143.68 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 96.18 |
p-value: <0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.03Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of Pretherapy Total Lesion Proliferation in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 143.68 standardized uptake value (SUV) | Standard Deviation 96.18 |
p-value: 0.01Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.05Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 0.02 l/min | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
p-value: 0.4Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.88Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 25 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the mid-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Mid-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 0.02 l/min | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
p-value: 0.43Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.8Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Overall survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of death from any cause (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Overall Survival (OS) | 0.4 l/min | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
p-value: 0.76Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.68Regression, Cox
Primary
Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Prediction efficacy is estimated using a hazard ratio (HR) and C-statistic (C-stat). Progression free survival is defined as the span of time from day 1 of therapy to date of disease recurrence (measured in months). Results are pooled with subjects from a pilot RDRC study for a total of 27 subjects analyzed. The Patlak influx rate, measured in l /min, is the rate of transport of FLT from blood into the tissue as well as the rate of molecular change of FLT, using a Patlak analysis.
Time frame: 36 months
Population: Participants who underwent the pre-therapy FLT PET scan
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLT PET Scan | Efficacy of the Patlak Influx Rate Constant for FLT (K-Patlak) Pre-therapy in Predicting Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 0.04 l/min | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
p-value: 0.78Regression, Cox
p-value: 0.66Regression, Cox