Skip to content

Lamotrigine Therapy in Geriatric Bipolar Depression

Lamotrigine Therapy in the Treatment of Geriatric Bipolar Depression: An Evaluation of Markers of Cerebral Energy Metabolism

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00720473
Enrollment
69
Registered
2008-07-22
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Depression

Keywords

Bipolar depression, Elderly, Lamotrigine, Brain energy metabolism

Brief summary

We propose to study the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine in the treatment of older adults with bipolar depression and to compare measures of brain energy metabolism between older subjects with bipolar depression and healthy age-matched controls in order to better understand treatment response in geriatric bipolar depression.

Detailed description

We will use MRI techniques and neuropsychological testing to investigate potential markers of treatment response in elderly bipolar depressed patients receiving lamotrigine and age-matched, non-depressed controls. We intend to test these hypotheses: 1. At least 50% of older subjects with bipolar depression will respond treatment with lamotrigine as evidenced by a 50% reduction on the Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS). In addition, treatment with lamotrigine will be safe and well tolerated as evidenced by a drop-out rate of less than 10% due to adverse effects. 2. Compared with healthy age-matched, non-demented, non-depressed controls, subjects with geriatric bipolar depression will demonstrate abnormalities in cerebral energy metabolism as assessed by elevated levels of glutamate and lactate, and decreased levels of NAA, using 1H MRS at 4T. 3. Successful treatment with lamotrigine in geriatric bipolar depression will result in decreases in lactate and glutamate, and elevations in NAA. 4. Baseline measures of executive functioning and information processing speed (measured by performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Trails A and B and Stroop tests) will be impaired in subjects with geriatric bipolar depression compared with healthy controls. These measures will improve with successful treatment with lamotrigine and correlate with improvements in markers of cerebral energy metabolism (lactate, glutamate, NAA).

Interventions

DRUGLamotrigine

Lamotrigine with dosage range from 25 mg to 200 mg per day.

Sponsors

Mclean Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(for Bipolar Subjects): * 60 years or older * Meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Depressed * First episode of mania before the age of 50 (early-onset bipolar disorder) * Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score of greater or equal to 20. * Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) of less than or equal to 6. * Able to provide informed consent * Must speak English * Must be able to visit McLean Hospital for the screening visit and six study visits during the 8-week duration of the study. * Subjects may be taking other medications for bipolar depression including antidepressants, mood stabilizers and antipsychotic mediations prior to lamotrigine therapy, but may not have any dosage adjustments of these medications in the week before lamotrigine is added.

Exclusion criteria

(for Bipolar Subjects): * Serious or unstable medical illness, including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic or hematologic disease. * History of seizure disorder * History or current diagnosis of the following psychiatric illnesses: any organic mental disorder (including dementia), schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, unipolar major depressive disorder, patients with substance dependence disorders, including alcohol, active within the last 12 months. * First episode of mania after the age of 50 (to exclude late-onset bipolar disorder) * History of multiple adverse drug reactions or allergy to the study drugs. * Use of medications that are excluded in this study (benzodiazepines, barbiturates; however, the use of non-benzodiazepine sedative hypnotics (such as zolpidem (Ambien)) may be used as needed except within 48 hours of the MRI scan) * Any of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Glutamine to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at BaselineBaseline
Mean Glutamate to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at BaselineBaseline
Mean N-Acetyl Aspartate (NAA) to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at BaselineBaseline
Associations Between Depression Symptom Severity and Glutamate to Creatine Ratio at BaselineBaselineEstimated changes in least squares mean in the metabolite ratio per 10-point increase in MADRS score. The minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.
Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up8 WeeksFollow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean
Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up8 weeksFollow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean
Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the NAA to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up8 weeksFollow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean
Association of MADRS Changes With Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up8 WeeksEstimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. The MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed score. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.
Associations of MADRS Changes With Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up8 weeksEstimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.
Associations of MADRS Changes With NAA to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up8 weeksEstimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.
Mean Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at BaselineBaselineThe minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed.
Means of MADRS Scores at 8 Weeks8 WeeksThe minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BPD Subjects
Open Label Study Lamotrigine : Lamotrigine with dosage range from 25 mg to 200 mg per day.
23
Control Subjects
Age matched controls without BPD
14
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl SubjectsBPD SubjectsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants17 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants23 participants37 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants14 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2414 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 242 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Association of MADRS Changes With Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up

Estimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. The MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed score. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: Association between depression symptom severity and metabolite ratios were only conducted in the depressed group, because there should be no change in MADRS score for non-depressed control subjects who received no treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsAssociation of MADRS Changes With Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up-.007 Glu:Cr/-10 MADRS
Primary

Associations Between Depression Symptom Severity and Glutamate to Creatine Ratio at Baseline

Estimated changes in least squares mean in the metabolite ratio per 10-point increase in MADRS score. The minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Association between depression symptom severity and metabolite ratios were only conducted in the depressed group, because there should be no change in MADRS score for non-depressed control subjects who received no treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsAssociations Between Depression Symptom Severity and Glutamate to Creatine Ratio at Baseline0.18 Glu:Cr/+10 MADRS
Primary

Associations of MADRS Changes With Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up

Estimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Association between depression symptom severity and metabolite ratios were only conducted in the depressed group, because there should be no change in MADRS score for non-depressed control subjects who received no treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsAssociations of MADRS Changes With Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up0.04 Gln:Cr/-10 MADRS Score
Primary

Associations of MADRS Changes With NAA to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up

Estimated least squares mean metabolite ratio changes with a 10-point decrease in MADRS score. MADRS minimum score is 0 and maximum is 60, with 60 being most depressed. Estimate was from linear regression models controlling for age and sex. The change is across regions, parieto-occipital and anterior cingulate cortex.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Association between depression symptom severity and metabolite ratios were only conducted in the depressed group, because there should be no change in MADRS score for non-depressed control subjects who received no treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsAssociations of MADRS Changes With NAA to Creatine Ratio Changes From Baseline to Follow-up0.05 NAA:Cr/-10 MADRS
Primary

Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up

Follow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean

Time frame: 8 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up0.00 serum Glutamate to Creatine ratio
Control SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in Glutamate to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up-0.12 serum Glutamate to Creatine ratio
Primary

Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up

Follow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up0.02 serum Glutamine to Creatine ratio
Control SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the Glutamine to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up0.08 serum Glutamine to Creatine ratio
Primary

Estimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the NAA to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up

Follow-up Least Squares Mean - Baseline Least Squares Mean

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BPD SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the NAA to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up0.06 NAA to creatine ratio
Control SubjectsEstimated Change in Least Squares Mean in the NAA to Creatine Ratio Between Baseline and Follow-up-0.03 NAA to creatine ratio
Primary

Mean Glutamate to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Baseline scans were available for 37 participants. One participant was missing scan data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BPD SubjectsMean Glutamate to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline.96 mean serum Glutamate to Creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.29
Control SubjectsMean Glutamate to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline.85 mean serum Glutamate to Creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.25
Primary

Mean Glutamine to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Baseline scans were available for 37 participants. One participant was missing scan data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BPD SubjectsMean Glutamine to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline.34 mean serum Glutamine to Creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.12
Control SubjectsMean Glutamine to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline.36 mean serum Glutamine to Creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.18
Primary

Mean Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Baseline

The minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: MADRS scores were available for 27 eligible bipolar subjects and 14 eligible controls.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BPD SubjectsMean Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Baseline24.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.65
Control SubjectsMean Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Baseline1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
Primary

Mean N-Acetyl Aspartate (NAA) to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Baseline scans were available for 37 participants. One participant was missing scan data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BPD SubjectsMean N-Acetyl Aspartate (NAA) to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline0.97 Mean NAA to creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.14
Control SubjectsMean N-Acetyl Aspartate (NAA) to Creatine Ratio by Diagnosis at Baseline0.84 Mean NAA to creatine ratioStandard Deviation 0.22
Primary

Means of MADRS Scores at 8 Weeks

The minimum MADRS score is 0 and the maximum is 60, with 60 being the most depressed.

Time frame: 8 Weeks

Population: MADRS scores were available for 16 bipolar subjects who completed the protocol and 8 healthy controls.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BPD SubjectsMeans of MADRS Scores at 8 Weeks18.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.41
Control SubjectsMeans of MADRS Scores at 8 Weeks1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026