Skip to content

The Use of a Mitochondrial Enhancement Treatment in Bipolar Disorder

The Use of a Mitochondrial Enhancement Treatment in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Acetyl-L-Carnitine and Alpha-Lipoic Acid for the Treatment of Bipolar Depression

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00719706
Enrollment
40
Registered
2008-07-22
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2012-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Depression

Keywords

Bipolar disorder, Bipolar depression, Natural substances, Depression

Brief summary

The primary objective of this 15-week clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that treatment with two proven mitochondrial enhancers, acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) and α-lipoic acid (ALA), has significantly greater efficacy than placebo as an augmentation treatment in bipolar depressed patients who display an incomplete response to conventional treatments.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this proposed clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that treatment with two proven mitochondrial enhancers, acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) and α-lipoic acid (ALA), has significantly greater efficacy than placebo as an augmentation treatment in bipolar depressed patients who display an incomplete response to conventional treatments. We propose to test this hypothesis by performing a 15-week placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, flexible-dose study investigating the use of ALCAR and ALA as an augmentation to treatment as usual in depressed bipolar patients. We will compare the efficacy of acetyl-l-carnitine (ALCAR) at doses of 1000-3000mg/day and alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) at doses of 600-1800mg/day with placebo on symptom improvement in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder type I, current episode depressed. Improvement will be assessed using the 21-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I). Furthermore, we hypothesize that improvement in depression symptoms following treatment with ALCAR and ALA will be associated with increases in phosphocreatine (PCr), beta-nucleoside triphosphate (β-NTP), and intracellular pH in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) both at week 1 and week 12 of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGacetyl-l-carnitine PLUS alpha-lipoic acide

1000-3000 mg/day of acetyl-l-carnitine in addition to 600-1800 mg/day of alpha-lipoic acid.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Stanley Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Mclean Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female age 18-65 years. * Meets DSM-IV criteria for Bipolar Disorder, type I with current episode depressed. * Current score of greater than or equal to 18 on the 21-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at Visits 1 and 2. * Maintained on a stable treatment regimen with no changes in medication dosages for at least two weeks prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent * Score of greater than or equal to 12 on the Young Mania Rating Scale at Visit 1 or 2. * Current suicidal or homicidal ideation. * Active psychotic symptoms. * Lifetime history of schizophrenia or obsessive-compulsive disorder. * DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence in the 3 months prior to screening. * Clinically significant medical condition that would interfere with study participation. * History of hypersensitivity to ACLCAR or ALA. * Pregnant or lactating.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Baseline to 15 WeeksScores could range from 0 - 72 units on a scale, with 0 representing the least number of depressive symptoms and 72 representing the most number of depressive symptoms.
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleBaseline to 15 weeksScores could range from 0 - 60 units on a scale with 0 representing the least number of depressive symptoms and 60 representing the most number of depressive symptoms.
The Young Mania Rating ScaleBaseline to 15 weeksThe scores could range from 0 - 60 units on a scale with 0 representing the least number of manic symptoms and 60 representing the most number of manic symptoms.
Clinical Global Impression-SeverityBaseline to 15 weeksScores could range from 0 - 7 units on a scale, with 0 representing the least severe (Normal, not at all ill) and 7 representing the most severe (Among the most extremely ill patients).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerBaseline to 12 weeksWhole brain total NTP levels as measured by a phosphorus MRS scan on the 4T scanner. The data could range from 0 - 1, with 0 representing the lowest NTP level and 1 representing the highest NTP level.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in August 2008 and ended in May 2011 and took place at a research lab within McLean hospital.

Pre-assignment details

To limit heterogeneity in the imaging sample, we accepted only type I bipolar disorder participants for the imaging component of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ALCAR/ALA
Participants taking 1000-3000mg/day of acetyl-l-carnitine PLUS 600-1800mg/day of alpha-lipoic acid.
20
Placebo
Participants taking placebo.
20
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event54
Overall StudyProtocol Violation30
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboALCAR/ALATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants40 Participants
Age Continuous44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
45.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2019 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Global Impression-Severity

Scores could range from 0 - 7 units on a scale, with 0 representing the least severe (Normal, not at all ill) and 7 representing the most severe (Among the most extremely ill patients).

Time frame: Baseline to 15 weeks

Population: At baseline, the number of participants analyzed was the number randomized into the study. At endpoint, the number or participants analyzed is the last observation carried forward of the original 20 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALCAR/ALAClinical Global Impression-SeverityBaseline Data4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ALCAR/ALAClinical Global Impression-SeverityEndpoint Data4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-SeverityBaseline Data4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-SeverityEndpoint Data4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Primary

The 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Scores could range from 0 - 72 units on a scale, with 0 representing the least number of depressive symptoms and 72 representing the most number of depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to 15 Weeks

Population: At baseline, the number of participants analyzed was the number randomized into the study. At endpoint, the number or participants analyzed is the last observation carried forward of the original 20 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALCAR/ALAThe 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Baseline Data23.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
ALCAR/ALAThe 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Endpoint Data17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
PlaceboThe 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Baseline Data22.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PlaceboThe 25-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Endpoint Data18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Primary

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Scores could range from 0 - 60 units on a scale with 0 representing the least number of depressive symptoms and 60 representing the most number of depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to 15 weeks

Population: At baseline, the number of participants analyzed was the number randomized into the study. At endpoint, the number or participants analyzed is the last observation carried forward of the original 20 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALCAR/ALAThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleBaseline Data26.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
ALCAR/ALAThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleEndpoint Data19.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
PlaceboThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleBaseline Data25.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboThe Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleEndpoint Data21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Primary

The Young Mania Rating Scale

The scores could range from 0 - 60 units on a scale with 0 representing the least number of manic symptoms and 60 representing the most number of manic symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to 15 weeks

Population: At baseline, the number of participants analyzed was the number randomized into the study. At endpoint, the number or participants analyzed is the last observation carried forward of the original 20 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALCAR/ALAThe Young Mania Rating ScaleBaseline Data2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
ALCAR/ALAThe Young Mania Rating ScaleEndpoint Data1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboThe Young Mania Rating ScaleEndpoint Data2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboThe Young Mania Rating ScaleBaseline Data2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Phosphorus MRS Scans on 4T Scanner

Whole brain total NTP levels as measured by a phosphorus MRS scan on the 4T scanner. The data could range from 0 - 1, with 0 representing the lowest NTP level and 1 representing the highest NTP level.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

Population: At baseline, the number of participants analyzed was the number entered into the imaging portion of the study. At endpoint, the number or participants analyzed is the last observation carried forward of the original 10 participants in each category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALCAR/ALAPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerBaseline Data.230 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.009
ALCAR/ALAPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerWeek 1 Data.229 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.011
ALCAR/ALAPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerEndpoint Data.229 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.006
PlaceboPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerBaseline Data.233 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.009
PlaceboPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerWeek 1 Data.225 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.008
PlaceboPhosphorus MRS Scans on 4T ScannerEndpoint Data.232 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.005

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026