Skip to content

American Ginseng in Treating Patients With Fatigue Caused by Cancer

The Use of American Ginseng (Panax Quinquefolius) to Improve Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00719563
Enrollment
364
Registered
2008-07-21
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2017-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Fatigue, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lymphoproliferative Disorder, Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Precancerous Condition, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Keywords

fatigue, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, acute undifferentiated leukemia, adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission, adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission, adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities, adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22), adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative, blastic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, mast cell leukemia, progressive hairy cell leukemia, initial treatment, prolymphocytic leukemia, recurrent adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia, recurrent adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, refractory hairy cell leukemia, relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, stage 0 chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage II adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage III adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage III chronic lymphocytic leukemia, stage IV adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, stage IV chronic lymphocytic leukemia, T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia, untreated adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage I adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III adult Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV adult Hodgkin lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, cutaneous B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage I cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage III cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, stage IV cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, recurrent mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage I mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage II mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage III mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, stage IV mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome, adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis, adult nasal type extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, splenic marginal zone lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma, contiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma, contiguous stage II small lymphocytic lymphoma, stage I adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage I adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage I adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage I adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage I grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage I grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage I mantle cell lymphoma, stage I marginal zone lymphoma, stage I small lymphocytic lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult Burkitt lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II mantle cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II marginal zone lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II small lymphocytic lymphoma, stage III adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage III adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage III adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III mantle cell lymphoma, stage III marginal zone lymphoma, stage III small lymphocytic lymphoma, stage IV adult Burkitt lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, stage IV adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV mantle cell lymphoma, stage IV marginal zone lymphoma, stage IV small lymphocytic lymphoma, recurrent adult Burkitt lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma, recurrent adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma, recurrent adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis, recurrent adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma, recurrent adult lymphoblastic lymphoma, recurrent grade 1 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 2 follicular lymphoma, recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma, recurrent mantle cell lymphoma, recurrent marginal zone lymphoma, recurrent small lymphocytic lymphoma, intraocular lymphoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, primary myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, extramedullary plasmacytoma, isolated plasmacytoma of bone, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, stage I multiple myeloma, stage II multiple myeloma, stage III multiple myeloma, primary systemic amyloidosis, refractory multiple myeloma, de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes, secondary myelodysplastic syndromes, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable

Brief summary

RATIONALE: American ginseng may reduce fatigue in patients with cancer. It is not yet known whether American ginseng is more effective than a placebo in treating cancer-related fatigue. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying American ginseng to see how well it works in treating patients with fatigue caused by cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To evaluate the efficacy of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) as therapy for cancer-related fatigue as measured by the general subscale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). Secondary * To evaluate toxicities and tolerability of American ginseng when used for cancer-related fatigue. * To examine stress as a mediating variable on the effects of American ginseng on cancer-related fatigue. * To explore the impact of American ginseng on various dimensions of fatigue as measured by the other subscales of the MFSI-SF, functional interference as measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale, and well being as measured by the Profile of Mood States (POMS), as well as the single measure of fatigue. * To determine clinically significant changes in fatigue scores using the global impression of change. * To evaluate whether there are differences in the efficacy of American ginseng for fatigue based on minority populations. Tertiary * To describe cortisol and cytokine values in fatigued cancer survivors and to evaluate the relationship of cortisol and cytokines to fatigue severity as well as to patterns of alterations previously documented in fatigued breast cancer survivors. * To evaluate whether Wisconsin Ginseng impacts the expression of cortisol and cytokine in fatigued cancer survivors. * To evaluate the role of cortisol and cytokine changes as the mechanism by which Wisconsin Ginseng can ameliorate cancer related fatigue. * To evaluate the relationships between cytokine and cortisol levels with secondary outcomes such as mood and stress. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to baseline fatigue score (4-7 vs 8-10), disease status of current cancer (initial diagnosis vs recurrent disease), current treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, endocrine therapy \[i.e., tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors\], or other targeted therapy) ( yes vs no), duration of all prior cancer treatment in patient's lifetime (none vs ≤ 180 days vs \> 180 days), and current tumor type (hematologic vs solid tumor malignancy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive oral American ginseng twice daily for 14 days. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. * Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo twice daily for 14 days. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 4 courses. Patients are instructed to complete the Ginseng Symptom Experience Diary and the Linear Analogue Scale weekly. Patients also complete the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), and the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study therapy. Patients who are not actively receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy undergo blood and saliva sample collection at baseline and periodically during study therapy for correlative studies.

Interventions

Given orally

OTHERplacebo

Given orally

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Required characteristics * ≥ 18 years of age * Men or women with a history of cancer-related fatigue as defined by an average score ≥ 4 over the past 30 days on the numeric analogue scale (1 - 10) * The presence of fatigue ≥ 1 month prior to randomization * ECOG performance score 0, 1, or 2 * Histologic or cytologic proven cancer other than brain cancer or CNS lymphoma, undergoing curative intent therapy (including anti-hormonal therapies such as tamoxifen or leuprolide) or those having completed curative intent therapy who were diagnosed within the past 2 years * Note: If a patient is receiving treatment for their disease such as chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy or radiation therapy then, the patient must have completed ≥ 1 cycle of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or ≥ 1 week of radiation treatment. * Laboratory values obtained prior to randomization: * Hgb ≥ 11 (must be obtained ≤ 30 days; patients must not be transfused ≤ 30 days to meet this criterion) * Creatinine ≤ 1.2 x UNL (must be obtained ≤ 180 days prior to randomization) * AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) ≤ 1.5 x UNL (must be obtained ≤ 180 days prior to randomization) * Negative pregnancy test done ≤ 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only * Ability to complete patient questionnaires alone or with assistance * Controlled: * Pain (≤ 4 on Linear Analogue Scale) * Insomnia (≤ 4 on Linear Analogue Scale) * Willingness to provide blood/saliva samples for correlative studies. * Note: These samples are only required for those not receiving active treatment for their disease. Active treatment is defined as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or immunotherapy, not anti-hormone therapy such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors or leuprolide. 2. Contraindications * Hypersensitivity to ginseng * Prior use of ginseng capsules for fatigue in the past year * Note: Prior use of teas or drinks containing ginseng is allowed, however, patients will be asked to avoid these beverages while on the study. * Uncontrolled hypertension on more than one occasion (diastolic blood pressure \> 100, systolic \> 160) measured ≤ 90 days prior to randomization * Currently using any other pharmacologic agents or nonpharmacologic interventions to specifically treat fatigue including psychostimulants, antidepressants, acupuncture, etc. * Note: Antidepressants used to treat items other than fatigue (such as hot flashes) are allowed if the patient has been on a stable dose for ≥ 1 month and plans to continue for ≥ 1 month. Erythropoietin agents to treat anemia are allowed. Exercise is allowed. * Known brain metastasis or primary CNS malignancy * Chronic systemic steroid use (including CHOP therapy or as part of any regular cancer treatment, however, steroids used as prophylaxis for nausea and vomiting are allowed) to prevent rash with Alimta, low dose dexamethasone will be allowed. * Diabetes Type I or II (defined by being on oral hypoglycemics or insulin). * Psychiatric disorder such as severe depression, manic depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or schizophrenia. (Defined per medical history). * ≤ 4 weeks from major surgery to randomization, including any procedure that requires general anesthetic * Any of the following: * Pregnant women * Nursing women * Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception * Pain requiring opioid pain medication, however, over the counter analgesics such as Tylenol or ibuprofen are allowed. * Use of full dose of anticoagulant therapy (Exception: 1 mg/day of Coumadin for preventing catheter clots is allowed). * Use of MAO inhibitors. * Planning to start or complete any type of cancer therapy during the 8 week, double blind, course of the study, once randomized on the study. Note: If not currently getting treatment, no chemotherapy agents ≤ 21 days prior to randomization. Combination treatment regimens that have components ending at different times are allowed, as long as any part of the initially started treatment continues through the double blind portion of the study. * Malnutrition, active infection, significant pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease as determined by the physician, as they could impact fatigue. * Use of any over the counter herbal/dietary supplement marketed for fatigue or energy (for example, products containing any type of ginseng, rhodiola rosea, high doses of caffeine, guarana, or anything called an adaptogen). * Uncontrolled nausea or vomiting or any symptom that would prevent the ability to comply with daily oral ginseng/placebo treatment. * Uncontrolled thyroid disorder. * Currently receiving single agent on blinded placebo controlled treatment trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SFBaseline and week 4Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) general subscale is a six-item subscale to measure the subjective experience of fatigue. The items include feeling pooped, worn out, fatigued, sluggish, run down and tired. Answers are on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFBaseline and Week 4Each MFSI-SF subscale consist of 6 items on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were then converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBaseline and Week 4Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) consist of 3 items that assess the severity of fatigue and 6 items that assess the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue or does not interfere with daily functioning and 10 as bad fatigue or completely interferes. The scores for the six items were summed up to form a total interference score. The linear analogue scale of fatigue was a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue and 10 as bad fatigue. All scores were then transformed into 0 to 100 scale, with 100 as less fatigue/less interference. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSBaseline and Week 4Profile of Mood States (POMS) measures a variety of mood states including tension/anxiety, depression/dejection, anger/hostility, vigor/activity, fatigue/inertia and confusion/bewilderment. Each subscale consist of 5 items with a 5 points-scale (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit and 4=extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all five items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 4 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Baseline and Week 4PSS consist of 14 items that assess the impact on stress in a 5-points scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often and 4=very often). The total scores were the sum of all 14 items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indication less stress. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFBaseline and week 8Each MFSI-SF subscale consist of 6 items on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were then converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.
Number of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceWeek 1 to Week 8Adverse events were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSBaseline and week 8Profile of Mood States (POMS) measures a variety of mood states including tension/anxiety, depression/dejection, anger/hostility, vigor/activity, fatigue/inertia and confusion/bewilderment. Each subscale consist of 5 items with a 5 points-scale (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit and 4=extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all five items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Baseline and Week 8PSS consist of 14 items that assess the impact on stress in a 5-points scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often and 4=very often). The total scores were the sum of all 14 items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indication less stress. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.
Average Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3Baseline and Week 4Changes in fatigue as measured using subscales of MFSI-SF, the interference scale of the BFI and the linear analogue scale (LASA) fatigue question were compared between arms for those participants who express a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 (moderately better) and +3 (very much better).
Average Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3Baseline and Week 8Changes in fatigue as measured using subscales of MFSI-SF, the interference scale of the BFI and the linear analogue scale fatigue question were compared between arms for those participants who express a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 (moderately better) and +3 (very much better).
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SF for Minority PopulationsBaseline and Week 4Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) general subscale is a six-item subscale to measure the subjective experience of fatigue. The items include feeling pooped, worn out, fatigued, sluggish, run down and tired. Answers are on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.
Change From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBaseline and Week 8Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) consist of 3 items that assess the severity of fatigue and 6 items that assess the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue or does not interfere with daily functioning and 10 as bad fatigue or completely interferes. The scores for the six items were summed up to form a total interference score. The linear analogue scale of fatigue was a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue and 10 as bad fatigue. All scores were then transformed into 0 to 100 scale, with 100 as less fatigue/less interference. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three-hundred and sixty-four participants were recruited between October 2008 and July 2011 from 40 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) member sites.

Pre-assignment details

There were a total of 23 cancellations (12 Ginseng, 11 Placebo) and these 23 patients were excluded from all analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ginseng
Patients received oral American ginseng twice daily for 14 days. This treatment was repeated every two weeks for 4 courses, for a total of 8 weeks of treatment.
171
Placebo
Patients received oral placebo twice daily for 14 days. This treatment was repeated every two weeks for 4 courses, for a total of 8 weeks of treatment.
170
Total341

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1613
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy37
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up53
Overall StudyMedical condition changed35
Overall StudyNoncompliant11
Overall StudyPersonal reasons67
Overall StudyUnknown reasons46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGinsengPlacebo
Age, Continuous55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Current endocrine therapy
Antiandrogen
7 participants2 participants5 participants
Current endocrine therapy
Aromatase inhibitor
60 participants27 participants33 participants
Current endocrine therapy
None
219 participants112 participants107 participants
Current endocrine therapy
Other
10 participants7 participants3 participants
Current endocrine therapy
Tamoxifen
45 participants23 participants22 participants
Currently receiving treatment
No
175 participants88 participants87 participants
Currently receiving treatment
Yes
166 participants83 participants83 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
330 Participants164 Participants166 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Exercising regularly
Missing
6 participants2 participants4 participants
Exercising regularly
No
196 participants98 participants98 participants
Exercising regularly
Yes
139 participants71 participants68 participants
Gender
Female
266 Participants138 Participants128 Participants
Gender
Male
75 Participants33 Participants42 Participants
If taking sleep aids, how frequent?
Daily
34 participants18 participants16 participants
If taking sleep aids, how frequent?
Intermittent
38 participants25 participants13 participants
If taking sleep aids, how frequent?
Not taking sleep aids
269 participants128 participants141 participants
Menopausal status
Not applicable (Male)
75 participants33 participants42 participants
Menopausal status
Post/natural-surgical
185 participants95 participants90 participants
Menopausal status
Pre
68 participants37 participants31 participants
Menopausal status
Unknown
13 participants6 participants7 participants
More than one primary cancer
No
265 participants131 participants134 participants
More than one primary cancer
Yes
76 participants40 participants36 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants10 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
312 Participants155 Participants157 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
341 participants171 participants170 participants
Sleep aids
No
269 participants128 participants141 participants
Sleep aids
Yes
72 participants43 participants29 participants
Time since current cancer diagnosis
180-360 days
89 participants47 participants42 participants
Time since current cancer diagnosis
<180 days
127 participants63 participants64 participants
Time since current cancer diagnosis
>360 days
125 participants61 participants64 participants
Type of cancer
Breast
206 participants110 participants96 participants
Type of cancer
Colon
37 participants20 participants17 participants
Type of cancer
Combination/unknown/other
55 participants22 participants33 participants
Type of cancer
Gynecologic
12 participants5 participants7 participants
Type of cancer
Hematologic
17 participants8 participants9 participants
Type of cancer
Prostate
14 participants6 participants8 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
115 / 168112 / 169
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1685 / 169

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SF

Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) general subscale is a six-item subscale to measure the subjective experience of fatigue. The items include feeling pooped, worn out, fatigued, sluggish, run down and tired. Answers are on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SF14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SF8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
p-value: 0.0737Wilcoxon Rank Sum
Secondary

Average Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3

Changes in fatigue as measured using subscales of MFSI-SF, the interference scale of the BFI and the linear analogue scale (LASA) fatigue question were compared between arms for those participants who express a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 (moderately better) and +3 (very much better).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments with a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 and +3 at week 4.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Mental8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Vigor13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Physical12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3BFI Total Interference27.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Emotional8.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3LASA Fatigue40.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF General38.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3LASA Fatigue37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF General29.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Physical5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Mental2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Emotional8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Vigor12.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3BFI Total Interference22.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Secondary

Average Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3

Changes in fatigue as measured using subscales of MFSI-SF, the interference scale of the BFI and the linear analogue scale fatigue question were compared between arms for those participants who express a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 (moderately better) and +3 (very much better).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 8 assessments with a perceived change in fatigue via the global impression score of a +2 and +3 at week 8.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Mental5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Vigor18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Physical7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3BFI Total Interference30.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Emotional9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3LASA Fatigue41.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
GinsengAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF General35.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3LASA Fatigue38.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF General30.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Physical3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Mental5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Emotional9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3MFSI-SF Vigor12.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
PlaceboAverage Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Fatigue for Those Who Perceive a Change of +2 and +3BFI Total Interference20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of Fatigue

Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) consist of 3 items that assess the severity of fatigue and 6 items that assess the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue or does not interfere with daily functioning and 10 as bad fatigue or completely interferes. The scores for the six items were summed up to form a total interference score. The linear analogue scale of fatigue was a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue and 10 as bad fatigue. All scores were then transformed into 0 to 100 scale, with 100 as less fatigue/less interference. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Usual11.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Now11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Worst11.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBFT Total Interference9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBFT Total Interference5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Usual9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Worst9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Now7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

PSS consist of 14 items that assess the impact on stress in a 5-points scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often and 4=very often). The total scores were the sum of all 14 items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indication less stress. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the General Subscale of the MFSI-SF for Minority Populations

Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) general subscale is a six-item subscale to measure the subjective experience of fatigue. The items include feeling pooped, worn out, fatigued, sluggish, run down and tired. Answers are on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: The analysis was not able to be done due to the low numbers of minorities accrued.

Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SF

Each MFSI-SF subscale consist of 6 items on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were then converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFPhysical1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFMental2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFEmotional0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFVigor1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFVigor0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFPhysical-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFEmotional0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 in the Impact on Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFMental0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMS

Profile of Mood States (POMS) measures a variety of mood states including tension/anxiety, depression/dejection, anger/hostility, vigor/activity, fatigue/inertia and confusion/bewilderment. Each subscale consist of 5 items with a 5 points-scale (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit and 4=extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all five items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 4 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 4.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 4 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSVigor/Activity5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSFatigue/Inertial14.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSVigor/Activity3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 4 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSFatigue/Inertial7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of Fatigue

Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) consist of 3 items that assess the severity of fatigue and 6 items that assess the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue or does not interfere with daily functioning and 10 as bad fatigue or completely interferes. The scores for the six items were summed up to form a total interference score. The linear analogue scale of fatigue was a 10-points scale with 0 as no fatigue and 10 as bad fatigue. All scores were then transformed into 0 to 100 scale, with 100 as less fatigue/less interference. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 8 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Usual16.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Now17.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Worst16.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBFI Total Interference12.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueBFI Total Interference9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Usual11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Worst10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Fatigue as Measured by the BFI and Linear Analogue Scale of FatigueFatigue Now8.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

PSS consist of 14 items that assess the impact on stress in a 5-points scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often and 4=very often). The total scores were the sum of all 14 items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indication less stress. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 8 assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 for the Impact on Stress as Measured by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SF

Each MFSI-SF subscale consist of 6 items on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all six items. The scores were then converted to a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.

Time frame: Baseline and week 8

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 8 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFPhysical3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFEmotional3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFMental2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFVigor4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFGeneral20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFVigor2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFGeneral10.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFPhysical-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFMental3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Impact on General, Physical, Mental, and Emotional States and Vigor as Measured by Other Subscales of the MFSI-SFEmotional2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMS

Profile of Mood States (POMS) measures a variety of mood states including tension/anxiety, depression/dejection, anger/hostility, vigor/activity, fatigue/inertia and confusion/bewilderment. Each subscale consist of 5 items with a 5 points-scale (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit and 4=extremely). The subscale scores were the sum of all five items. The scores were then transformed into a 100-point scale with higher numbers indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the baseline scores from the scores at week 8.

Time frame: Baseline and week 8

Population: Includes all participants who completed both baseline and week 8 assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSVigor/Activity8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
GinsengChange From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSFatigue/Inertia18.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSVigor/Activity6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 8 Vigor/Activity and Fatigue-inertia as Measured by POMSFatigue/Inertia10.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Secondary

Number of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% Incidence

Adverse events were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 8

Population: Includes all participants that reported at least one value after baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Nausea5 participants
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Vomiting2 participants
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Insomnia9 participants
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 3 Insomnia1 participants
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Anxiety4 participants
GinsengNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Agitation2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Anxiety5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Nausea3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 3 Insomnia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Vomiting2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Agitation4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Treatment Related Grade 2 to 3 Adverse Events >=1% IncidenceGrade 2 Insomnia10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026