Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a and Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment in Adult Patients With Kidney Cancer

A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase II Study to Compare Bevacizumab Plus RAD001 Versus Interferon Alfa-2a Plus Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00719264
Enrollment
365
Registered
2008-07-21
Start date
2008-11-12
Completion date
2013-04-15
Last updated
2017-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Hypernephroid, Nephroid Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Keywords

Renal cell carcinoma, Adults, Bevacizumab, RAD001, Everolimus, Interferon, Clear, Roferon, Avastin, Nephrectomy, newly diagnosed

Brief summary

To estimate the difference in efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and RAD001 compared to bevacizumab and interferon alfa-2a for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the kidney.

Interventions

10 mg qd

dose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3

DRUGbevacizumab

10 mg/kg every 2 weeks

Sponsors

Roche Pharma AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma 2. Patients with at least one measurable lesion 3. Patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma 4. Patients who had a prior partial or complete nephrectomy 5. Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70%. 6. Adequate bone marrow function 7. Adequate liver function 8. Adequate renal function 9. Adequate coagulation profile

Exclusion criteria

1. 4 weeks post-major surgery 2. Patients who had radiation therapy within 28 days prior to start of study 3. Patients in need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study. 4. Patients with a serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture. 5. Patients with a history of seizure(s) not controlled with standard medical therapy. 6. Patients who have received prior systemic treatment for their metastatic RCC. 7. Patients who received prior therapy with VEGF pathway inhibitor 8. Patients who have previously received systemic mTOR inhibitors 9. Patients with a known hypersensitivity RAD001 (everolimus) or other rapamycins or to its excipients. 10. Patients with history or current central nervous system (CNS) metastases or spinal cord compression. 11. Patients with a history of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months prior to study enrollment. 12. Patients with proteinuria at screening. 13. Patients with inadequately controlled hypertension 14. Patients receiving ongoing or with recent need for full therapeutic dose of oral or parenteral anticoagulants or chronic daily treatment with aspirin 15. Patients receiving chronic systemic treatment with corticosteroids or another immunosuppressive agent. 16. Patients with a known history of HIV 17. Patients with hypersensitivity to interferon alfa-2a or any component of the product. 18. Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or recurrent thromboembolism 19. Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions or other conditions 20. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< lower limit of institutional normal assessed by ECHO or MUGA 21. Patients who have a history of another primary malignancy ≤ 3 years 22. Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding 23. Patients who are using other investigational agents or who had received investigational drugs ≤ 4 weeks prior to study treatment start. 24. Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabTime from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabTime from first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.Overall response is defined as the number of participants having achieved confirmed Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.
Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabTime from first documented response date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death due to underlying cancer, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cut-off date.The duration of response, applied only to participants with best overall response at CR or PR, is defined as the number of days between the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the date of the event: radiological progression as per central review or death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurs first. If no event, participant is censored at the last adequate assessment.
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsFrom the first participant randomized until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 daysParticipants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths throughout the study. Participants were assessed continuously at each 28-day cycle.
Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabTime from randomization to the date of death from any cause, reported between date of first participant randomized and up to 2 years after the last participant randomized (data cutoff: 30Aug2012)Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). The PF subscale consists of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The score for the PF subscale and global health status range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.
Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and BevacizumabFrom the date of the first participant treated until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 daysThis outcome measure was assessed continuously.
Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score UnitsTime from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first patient randomized until 31Dec2011The analysis of this outcome measure was based on the FKSI-DRS scale which is a validated disease-related symptom index containing 9 items that measure symptoms predominantly related to kidney cancer. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). If at least 5 of the 9 questions have been answered, the FKSI-DRS total score is calculated by subtracting nine times the mean of the scores of the answered items from 36. Participants with less than 5 out of the 9 questions answered will have a missing FKSI-DRS total score. The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration is defined as a decrease by at least 2 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Egypt, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)
Participants received oral everolimus 10 mg qd plus intravenous bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 2 weeks.
182
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)
Participants received subcutaneous IFN dose escalated from 3 MIU (million international unit) during week 1, 6 MIU during week 2, and 9 MIU during week 3 of treatment and subsequently (if tolerated), 3 times per week plus intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks.
183
Total365

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems64
Overall StudyAdverse Event4149
Overall StudyDeath1310
Overall StudyDisease Progression104107
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyNew Cancer Therapy42
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Total
Age, Continuous60.71 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.584
59.93 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.272
60.32 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.422
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants52 Participants96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
138 Participants131 Participants269 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
173 / 180179 / 181
serious
Total, serious adverse events
79 / 18076 / 181

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death from any cause, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.

Population: Full Analysis Set: This set consists of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab9.3 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Progression-free Survival (PFS) of Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab10.0 Months
Secondary

Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Overall response is defined as the number of participants having achieved confirmed Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR). Confirmed CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Confirmed PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression. CR required a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.

Time frame: Time from first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cutoff date.

Population: Full Analysis Set: This set consists of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabComplete response (CR)0 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabPartial response (PR)49 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabStable disease (SD)90 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabProgressive disease (PD)25 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabUnknown response18 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabOverall objective response (CR+PR)49 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabUnknown response22 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabComplete response (CR)1 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabProgressive disease (PD)26 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabPartial response (PR)50 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabOverall objective response (CR+PR)51 Number of participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Best Overall Response in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus BevacizumabStable disease (SD)84 Number of participants
Secondary

Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab

This outcome measure was assessed continuously.

Time frame: From the date of the first participant treated until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days

Population: Safety Set: The safety set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug (everolimus, bevacizumab or IFN) and had a valid post-baseline assessment. No AE or occurrence of death, noted at assessment, constitutes a valid post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Duration of Exposure of RAD001 in Participants Randomized to the Treatment Combination of RAD001 and Bevacizumab37.0 weeks
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and Deaths

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths throughout the study. Participants were assessed continuously at each 28-day cycle.

Time frame: From the first participant randomized until the last patient discontinued the study treatment + 28 days

Population: Safety Set: The safety set included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug (everolimus, bevacizumab or IFN) and had a valid post-baseline assessment. No AE or occurrence of death, noted at assessment, constitutes a valid post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsAdverse events (serious and non-serious)179 Participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsSerious adverse events79 Participants
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsDeaths93 Participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsAdverse events (serious and non-serious)180 Participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsSerious adverse events76 Participants
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events and DeathsDeaths95 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of death from any cause, reported between date of first participant randomized and up to 2 years after the last participant randomized (data cutoff: 30Aug2012)

Population: Full Analysis Set: This set consists of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab27.1 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Overall Survival (OS) Treatment Effect in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab27.1 Months
Secondary

Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab

The duration of response, applied only to participants with best overall response at CR or PR, is defined as the number of days between the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the date of the event: radiological progression as per central review or death due to underlying cancer, whichever occurs first. If no event, participant is censored at the last adequate assessment.

Time frame: Time from first documented response date of radiological progressive disease as per independent central review, death due to underlying cancer, or last tumor assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011, cut-off date.

Population: A subset of participants from the full analysis set were analyzed. The full analysis set consists of all randomized participants. the subset includes participants who were complete responders or partial responders.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab13.3 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Response Duration Differences in Participants Who Received RAD001 Plus Bevacizumab Versus Participants Who Received IFN Plus Bevacizumab11.3 Months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units

The analysis of this outcome measure was based on the FKSI-DRS scale which is a validated disease-related symptom index containing 9 items that measure symptoms predominantly related to kidney cancer. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much). If at least 5 of the 9 questions have been answered, the FKSI-DRS total score is calculated by subtracting nine times the mean of the scores of the answered items from 36. Participants with less than 5 out of the 9 questions answered will have a missing FKSI-DRS total score. The FKSI-DRS total score ranges from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 36 (no symptoms). Definitive deterioration is defined as a decrease by at least 2 units compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first patient randomized until 31Dec2011

Population: Full Analysis Set: This set consists of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units7.4 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Risk Score by at Least 2 Score Units8.0 Months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). The PF subscale consists of 5 questions each scored from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The score for the PF subscale and global health status range from 0 to 100, with a higher score representing a high level of functioning/high quality of life. Definitive deterioration by at least 10% is defined as a decrease in score by at least 10% compared to baseline, with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 10% is considered definitive only if it is the last one available for the participant.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of definitive deterioration (defined as no later increase above the threshold observed during the study), or date of last assessment, reported between date of first participant randomized until 31Dec2011

Population: Full Analysis Set: This set consists of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%Global health status/QoL7.4 Months
Bevacizumab, RAD001 (Everolimus)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%Physical functioning8.5 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%Global health status/QoL7.8 Months
Bevacizumab, Interferon Alfa-2a (IFN)Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Global Health Status and the Physical Functioning (PF) Subscale Scores of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) by at Least 10%Physical functioning9.0 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026