Skip to content

A Study of Verutex (Fusidic Acid), Eritex (Erythromycin) and Fisiogel in the Management of Tarceva-Associated Rash.

A Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Use of the Dermatological Creams Verutex, Eritex and Fisiogel in the Management of Skin Rash Associated With Tarceva Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00718315
Enrollment
201
Registered
2008-07-18
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2015-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This 3 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of three different dermatological creams designed for prophylaxis of skin rash associated with Tarceva treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Eligible patients who have recently started Tarceva treatment will be randomized to one of 3 groups, to receive daily treatment with Verutex, Eritex or Fisiogel cream for 30 days, and the incidence and severity of skin rash will be assessed. The anticipated time on study treatment is \<3 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib [Tarceva]

150mg po daily

DRUGfusidic acid [Verutex]

topical, daily for 30 days.

DRUGerythromycin [Eritex]

topical, daily for 30 days.

DRUGFisiogel

topical, daily for 30 days

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB/IV); * eligible to start treatment with Tarceva, or receiving Tarceva for \<=5 days.

Exclusion criteria

* presence of skin rash or other signs of skin toxicity; * treatment with any systemic or intranasal antibiotic within 7 days before randomization; * treatment with other topical formulation within 14 days before randomization; * other anticancer therapy in addition to Tarceva.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Skin Rash30 DaysSkin rash was assessed by the investigator and dermatologists (the latter ones only through pictures) and scored according to (National cancer Institute -Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ) NCI-CTCAE ( version 3 (line Rash/desquamation - short name rash).
Percentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity Grade30 DaysThe severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Appearance of Skin RashDays 0, 15, and 30Time to occurence of skin rash was calculated as the number of days from Day 0 until the first appearance of skin rash as defined by NCI-CTCAE
Percentage of Participants With ErythemaDays 0, 15, and 30Erythema is defined as redness of the skin or mucous membranes, caused by hyperemia of superficial capillaries
Percentage of Participants With PruritusDays 0, 15, and 30Pruritus is defined as intense localized itching
Percentage of Participants With PainDays 0, 15, and 30Pain is defined as an unpleasant feeling often caused by intense or damaging stimuli
Percentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity Grade30 DaysThe severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.
Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity Grade30 DaysThe severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.
Percentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity Grade30 DaysThe severity of pain was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fisiogel
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg daily and A thin film of the topical formulation of Fisiogel was applied to face, neck, and anterior and posterior chest twice daily (every 12 hours), as per medical guidance daily for 30 days.
67
Stiemicyn
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg daily and a thin film of the topical formulation of Stiemicyn was applied to face, neck, and anterior and posterior chest twice daily (every 12 hours), as per medical guidance daily for 30 days.
67
Verutex
Participants received erlotinib 150 mg daily and a thin film of the topical formulation of Verutex was applied to face, neck, and anterior and posterior chest twice daily (every 12 hours), as per medical guidance daily for 30 days.
67
Total201

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event123
Overall StudyDeath665
Overall StudyDisease progression011
Overall StudyErlotinib dose decreased431
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up234
Overall StudyOther001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation553
Overall StudyUse of ATB and Corticoids012
Overall StudyUse of Minocyclin111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFisiogelStiemicynVerutexTotal
Age, Continuous65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants31 Participants26 Participants94 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants36 Participants41 Participants107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 6745 / 6648 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 6713 / 6619 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Develop Skin Rash

Skin rash was assessed by the investigator and dermatologists (the latter ones only through pictures) and scored according to (National cancer Institute -Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ) NCI-CTCAE ( version 3 (line Rash/desquamation - short name rash).

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants Who Develop Skin Rash60.0 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants Who Develop Skin Rash69.2 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants Who Develop Skin Rash73.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.481t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.933t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.986t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity Grade

The severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 029.8 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 249.1 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 121.1 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 30 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 30 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 025.0 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 118.3 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 256.7 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 018.3 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 235.0 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 33.3 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Skin Rash Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 143.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Erythema

Erythema is defined as redness of the skin or mucous membranes, caused by hyperemia of superficial capillaries

Time frame: Days 0, 15, and 30

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema56.7 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema56.7 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema43.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.199Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity Grade

The severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 223.0 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 037.7 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 139.3 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 30 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 136.5 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 039.7 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 222.2 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 052.5 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 26.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Erythema Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 139.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.066Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain

Pain is defined as an unpleasant feeling often caused by intense or damaging stimuli

Time frame: Days 0, 15, and 30

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain16.4 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain25.4 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain13.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.179Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity Grade

The severity of pain was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 082.0 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 111.5 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 24.9 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 24.8 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 30 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 073.0 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 122.2 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 085.2 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 16.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 26.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pain Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.308Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pruritus

Pruritus is defined as intense localized itching

Time frame: Days 0, 15, and 30

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus36.1 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus47.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus29.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.108Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity Grade

The severity of skin rash was graded on a 5 point scale where 0 (equals)= absent, 1= mile, 2=moderate, 3= severe, 4= life threatening and 5= Death; Severity graded by oncologist.

Time frame: 30 Days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 119.7 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 063.9 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 214.8 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
FisiogelPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 131.7 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 052.4 percentage of participants
StiemicynPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 214.3 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 070.5 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 23.3 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 50 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 31.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 124.6 percentage of participants
VerutexPercentage of Participants With Pruritus Stratified by Severity GradeGrade 40 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.087Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Time to Appearance of Skin Rash

Time to occurence of skin rash was calculated as the number of days from Day 0 until the first appearance of skin rash as defined by NCI-CTCAE

Time frame: Days 0, 15, and 30

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FisiogelTime to Appearance of Skin Rash16.0 Days
StiemicynTime to Appearance of Skin Rash15.0 Days
VerutexTime to Appearance of Skin Rash15.0 Days
p-value: 0.095Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026