Skip to content

Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Study of a Vitamin D Compound (DP001) in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density

A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Daily-dose, Proof-of-concept Study of a Vitamin D Compound in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00715676
Acronym
2MD-3H-2B
Enrollment
157
Registered
2008-07-15
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2010-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, 2-methylene-19-nor-(20S)-1a, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, Vitamin D, Bone Density Conservation Agents, Bone Regeneration

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effect of a 1-year administration of the vitamin D analog 2-methylene-19-nor-(20S)-1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (DP001) on bone mineral density (BMD), safety, and tolerability.

Detailed description

DP001 is a vitamin D analog that has been shown to stimulate bone formation in pre-clinical studies. In a Phase 1B study of postmenopausal women, an increase in the bone formation marker, osteocalcin, was evident without an increase in serum calcium. The aim of this study is to determine if 1-year administration of DP001 to postmenopausal women with osteopenia results in a significant increase in BMD at doses that are safe and well tolerated.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

oral, once daily

DRUGDP001

oral, once daily

Sponsors

Deltanoid Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal female subjects, defined as amenorrheic for at least 5 years * Body Mass Index of 18 to 35 * Osteopenic * Generally healthy * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History or evidence of acute or unstable chronic hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, psychiatric, or neurologic diseases * Current or recent treatment with any medications or products affecting vitamin D metabolism, calcium balance, bone turnover, or an investigational drug therapy * 12-lead electrocardiogram demonstrating QTc (QT interval corrected for heart rate) \>450 milliseconds at screening * Abnormal creatinine clearance * Elevated urinary calcium levels * Vitamin D deficiency * Excessive dietary calcium or vitamin D intake * Current use of any illicit drug and/or history of alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Percent change in lumbar spine BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Percent change in femoral neck BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Percent change in trochanter BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52Baseline and Week 52The percent change in hip BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Baseline and Week 26Percent change from baseline at Week 26
Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event1 yearTo assess safety and tolerability, the number of subjects in each treatment group who had one or more adverse events recorded after the beginning of study drug administration were determined.
Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium Levels at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change in serum calcium value (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were enrolled from 5 March 2007 to 19 December 2007 at 9 centers within the United States.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo soft gel capsules, oral, once daily
49
220 ng DP001
220 ng DP001 soft gel capsules, oral, once daily
54
440 ng DP001
440 ng DP001 soft gel capsules, oral, once daily
53
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event3521
Overall StudyDid Not Meet Entry Criteria001
Overall StudyElevated Blood Glucose010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up121
Overall StudyTerminated by Sponsor100
Overall StudyUse of Exclusionary Medication001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject138

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo220 ng DP001440 ng DP001Total
Age Continuous61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants54 Participants53 Participants156 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 4937 / 5444 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 491 / 543 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52

Percent change in lumbar spine BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: This analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set, which included all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.537 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.545
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.174 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.82
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 520.309 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.904
Comparison: A sample size of 49 per treatment group was calculated to have at least 90% power to detect a 2% or greater increase over placebo assuming the following: (1) a standard deviation of the percent change of 2.75% (2) a dropout rate of 30%, and (3) one-sided 0.05 level of significancep-value: 0.641ANOVA
Comparison: A sample size of 49 per treatment group was calculated to have at least 90% power to detect a 2% or greater increase over placebo assuming the following: (1) a standard deviation of the percent change of 2.75% (2) a dropout rate of 30%, and (3) one-sided 0.05 level of significancep-value: 0.243ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium Levels at Week 52

Change in serum calcium value (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: This analysis was done for all subjects for whom both baseline and Week 52 data was available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Calcium Levels at Week 52-0.06 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.268
220 ng DP001Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium Levels at Week 520.11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.286
440 ng DP001Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium Levels at Week 520.29 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.243
90% CI: [0.164, 0.181]
90% CI: [0.573, 0.591]
Secondary

Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event

To assess safety and tolerability, the number of subjects in each treatment group who had one or more adverse events recorded after the beginning of study drug administration were determined.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: The participants for this analysis included all randomized subjects who received a dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Subjects With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event41 Participants
220 ng DP001Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event45 Participants
440 ng DP001Number of Subjects With at Least 1 Treatment-emergent Adverse Event46 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52

Percent change in femoral neck BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: This analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set, which included all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.428 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.511
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-1.085 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.15
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.680 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.507
p-value: 0.395ANOVA
p-value: 0.523ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52

The percent change in hip BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: This analysis was conducted on the Full Analysis Set, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study drug. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.315 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 1.894
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.540 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 1.782
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.887 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 1.833
p-value: 0.778ANOVA
p-value: 0.173ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26

Percent change from baseline at Week 26

Time frame: Baseline and Week 26

Population: Analyses were performed using subjects for whom both Baseline and Week 26 samples were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Osteocalcin3.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.4
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Serum C-telopeptide cross-links of type 1 collagen4.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.4
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Procollagen type 1 N-propeptide1.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 29.5
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Osteocalcin22.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Serum C-telopeptide cross-links of type 1 collagen13.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 32.4
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Procollagen type 1 N-propeptide11.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 40.7
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Serum C-telopeptide cross-links of type 1 collagen54.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 54.2
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Procollagen type 1 N-propeptide9.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.4
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Markers at Week 26Osteocalcin80.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 73.3
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52

Percent change in trochanter BMD (relative to baseline) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: This analysis was performed on the Full Analysis Set, which included all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Trochanter Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.375 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.604
220 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.341 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.565
440 ng DP001Percent Change From Baseline in Trochanter Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52-0.941 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.554
p-value: 0.928ANOVA
p-value: 0.124ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026