Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Plasticity
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to use (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) TMS or drugs to improve learning of movement skills and the adaptation processes in patients after stroke. Once investigators have determined the improving effect of TMS and the drugs on learning of movement skills, the study team may be able to provide information that improves rehabilitative treatment and helps to improve recovery after stroke.
Detailed description
Previous studies have shown, that when patients learn a new motor movement, it may cause a change in the way the nerves act in the area of the brain that controls movement. This change is called use-dependent plasticity. The ability of that part of the brain, called the motor cortex (M1), to reorganize plays a major role in the recovery of motor deficits post-stroke; hence the importance for further development of rehabilitative strategies that utilize this potential for recovery. In this proposed study, investigators will further examine influences of use-dependent plasticity in the non-injured M1 of healthy subjects and injured M1 of stroke subjects using a combination of non-invasive cortical stimulation, medication, and exercise techniques. In Aim 1, investigators will test the effect of drugs that interact specifically with different neurotransmitter systems on use-dependent plasticity in intact M1 of healthy humans. In Aim 2, investigators will identify the parameters for non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 that are most effective to enhance use-dependent plasticity in intact healthy human M1. In Aim 3, investigators will test the drugs and rTMS protocols that were demonstrated to be most effective to enhance use- dependent plasticity in the Specific Aim 1 and 2 and apply them to participants who have experienced a stroke. Results from this study will help to inform future research about the efficacy of plasticity enhancing methods in injured M1 of stroke patients.
Interventions
OTHERTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Each TMS training session will begin with a baseline measurement lasting about 30 minutes in which brief magnetic pulses will be generated by the single-pulse and paired pulse TMS stimulator and the responses are recorded with surface EMG electrodes. Participants will be instructed to move their wrist for up to ½ hour. After these measures, rTMS will be applied to the scalp during training. Stimulation will occur at a low rate of different frequencies and different times with respect to the training movement depending on the experimental condition. In the last phase of the session post-training measurements will be done using single TMS pulses. TMS pulses and intensity with be given in random order.
Participants will receive one oral dose of carbidopa-levodopa 25mg one hour prior to measuring wrist extension movements. The order in which Carbidopa-Levodopa is given will be randomized per participant.
DRUGMethylphenidate
Participants will receive one oral dose of methylphenidate 40mg 2 hours prior to measuring wrist extension movements. The order in which Methylphenidate is given will be randomized per participant.
Participants will receive one oral dose of amphetamine sulfate 10mg 2 hours prior to measuring wrist extension movements. The order in which Amphetamine Sulfate is given will be randomized per participant.
DRUGPlacebo
Participants will receive one oral tablet of placebo 2 hours prior to measuring wrist extension movements. The order in which Placebo is given will be randomized per participant.
Sham TMS pulses will be randomly administered during TMS sessions.
OTHERTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Training
TMS surface electromyographic activity will be recorded with surface electrodes mounted on the skin overlaying a forearm muscle. Single pulses of TMS at increasing intensity will be delivered to measure motor cortex excitability. Peak acceleration and TMS evoked responses in the muscle will be measured prior to the training, after completion of the training and again one hour after completion of the training.
Sponsors
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Emory University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Aims 1 and 2 Inclusion Criteria: * Normal neurological examination * Ability to meet criteria of inclusion experiment * Ability to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* History or neurological or psychiatric disease * Abnormal MRI of brain * Abnormal neuropsychological testing * Intake of CNS active drugs * History of seizure disorder * History of migraine headaches * History of anaphylaxis or allergic reactions * Contraindication to TMS Aim 3: Inclusion Criteria: * Cerebral ischemic infarction more than 6 months prior to entering the study * Single lesion as defined by MRI of the brain affecting the primary motor output system of the hand at a cortical (M1) level or subcortical level, or unilateral, and supratentorial in absence of history of a previous symptomatic stroke within 3 months of the current stroke * Dense paresis of the hand for more than three days after cerebral infarction (MRC of \< 4- of wrist- and finger extension/flexion movements) * Good functional recovery of hand function as defined by MRC of 4 or 4+ of wrist- and finger extension/flexion movements * Ability to perform wrist extension movements * Ability to meet criteria of inclusion experiment * Ability to give informed consent * Ability of TMS to elicit a measurable MEP of \> 100 μV and an increase in MEP amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity (up to 100% of MSO) of at least 20% over MEP amplitude at MT
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning. |
| Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean sum of normalized MEP for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo at 0.1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. |
| Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean peak acceleration for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface. |
| Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean sum of normalized MEP for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect to the pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in mV. Long- lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning. |
| Aim 3: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface. |
| Aim 3: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning. |
| Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes) | Mean peak acceleration of wrist movements for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect of the TMS pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were recruited between April 2007 and August 2013.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Aim 1 Healthy adult female and male subjects received study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability. | 10 |
| Aim 2 Healthy adult female and male subjects received TMS prior to measuring wrist extension movements. | 9 |
| Aim 3 Female and male subjects who have experienced a cerebral ischemic infarction will receive study drugs and TMS to measure M1 excitability. | 1 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Screen failure | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Aim 2 | Aim 3 | Aim 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 15 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | 0 Participants | — | — | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 20 Participants | 9 Participants | 1 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 12 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 10 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 1 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 5 / 10 | 0 / 9 | 1 / 1 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 10 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 1 |
Outcome results
Primary
Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 1 participants per protocol for the placebo condition. One subject was not included in the analysis due to corrupt data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline Placebo - MEPmax | 1.01 mV | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 1 Placebo - MEPmax | 1.63 mV | Standard Error 0.33 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 2 Placebo - MEPmax | 1.29 mV | Standard Error 0.05 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline - Amphetamine Sulfate - MEPmax | .73 mV | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 1 Ampletamine Sulfate - MEPmax | 1.22 mV | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 2 Amphetamine Sulfate - MEPmax | 1.08 mV | Standard Error 0.04 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline Methylphenidate - MEPmax | 1.04 mV | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 1 Methylphenidate - MEPmax | 1.10 mV | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 2 Methylphenidate - MEPmax | 1.22 mV | Standard Error 0.06 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Baseline Carbidopa-Levodopa - MEPmax | 1.81 mV | Standard Error 0.62 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 1 Carbidopa-Levodopa - MEPmax | 1.41 mV | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC) | Post-Training 2 Carbidopa-Levodopa - MEPmax | 1.53 mV | Standard Error 0.13 |
Primary
Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements
Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1 (Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 1 participants per protocol. One subject was not included in the analysis due to corrupt data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline - Placebo | 1.32 g | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 1 - Placebo | 1.33 g | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 2 - Placebo | 1.24 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline - Amphetamine Sulfate | 1.24 g | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 1 - Amphetamine Sulfate | 1.28 g | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 2 - Amphetamine Sulfate | 1.29 g | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline - Methylphenidate | 1.35 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 1 - Methylphenidate | 1.27 g | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 2 - Methylphenidate | 1.22 g | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Baseline - Carbidopa-Levodopa | 1.22 g | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 1 - Carbidopa-Levodopa | 1.23 g | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 1: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements | Post-Training 2 - Carbidopa-Levodopa | 1.37 g | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
Secondary
Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency
Mean peak acceleration for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - Placebo | 1.44 g | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - Placebo | 1.36 g | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - Placebo | 1.35 g | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - Placebo | 1.33 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .1 Hz | 1.33 g | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .1 Hz | 1.43 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .1 Hz | 1.50 g | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .1 Hz | 1.53 g | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .25 Hz | 1.38 g | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .25 Hz | 1.35 g | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .25 Hz | 1.40 g | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .25 Hz | 1.34 g | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .5 Hz | 1.32 g | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .5 Hz | 1.29 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .5 Hz | 1.25 g | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .5 Hz | 1.29 g | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Secondary
Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse
Mean peak acceleration of wrist movements for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect of the TMS pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (zero) | 1.33 g | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (zero) | 1.43 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (zero) | 1.51 g | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (zero) | 1.53 g | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (placebo) | 1.44 g | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (placebo) | 1.36 g | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (placebo) | 1.35 g | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (placebo) | 1.33 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (-100) | 1.51 g | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (-100) | 1.5 g | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (-100) | 1.46 g | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (-100) | 1.47 g | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (+300) | 1.40 g | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (+300) | 1.32 g | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (+300) | 1.38 g | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (+300) | 1.40 g | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
Secondary
Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency
Mean sum of normalized MEP for the different frequencies of rTMS treatment (placebo at 0.1 Hz, 0.1 Hz, 0.25 Hz, 0.5 Hz) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - Placebo | .67 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - Placebo | .93 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - Placebo | .94 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - Placebo | 1.02 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .1 Hz | .71 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .1 Hz | 1.06 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .1 Hz | 1.06 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .1 Hz | 1.14 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.24 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .25 Hz | .67 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .25 Hz | .90 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .25 Hz | .90 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .25 Hz | .98 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Baseline - .5 Hz | .64 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 1 - .5 Hz | .92 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 2 - .5 Hz | .90 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) for rTMS Treatment With Respect to Frequency | Post-Training 3 - .5 Hz | .84 millivolts | Standard Deviation 1 |
Secondary
Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse
Mean sum of normalized MEP for repeated TMS (rTMS) conditions with respect to the pulse (-100, +300, placebo, zero) prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in mV. Long- lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: Analysis was completed in Aim 2 participants per protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (placebo) | .51 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (placebo) | .52 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (-100) | .39 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (-100) | .56 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (-100) | .60 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (-100) | .61 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (+300) | .38 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (+300) | .54 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (+300) | .48 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (+300) | .51 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (zero) | .39 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (zero) | .66 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 2 - Pulse (zero) | .63 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 3 - Pulse (zero) | .69 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Baseline - Pulse (placebo) | .40 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Aim 1 | Aim 2: Mean Sum of Normalized Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) With Respect to Pulse | Post-Training 1 - Pulse (placebo) | .54 millivolts | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
Secondary
Aim 3: Mean Parameter Estimate for Maximal Motor Evoked Potential (MEPmax) Derived From Stimulus Response Curves (SRC)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2), and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3).The MEP is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at increased intensity. Its amplitude is measured from peak to peak and expressed in millivolts (mV). Measured MEP amplitudes were plotted against the intensity to create a stimulus response curve (SRC). SRCs were modeled by a 3- parameter sigmoid function and MEPmax was extracted. Long-lasting increases in MEP amplitude indicate increases in motor cortex excitability and are associated with motor learning.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: No sufficient data collected.
Secondary
Aim 3: Mean Peak Acceleration of Wrist Extension Movements
Mean peak acceleration was measured across study drug conditions prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after the treatment (post-training 1), 30 minutes after the treatment (post-training 2) and 60 minutes after the treatment (post-training 3). Increases in the mean peak acceleration of the trained wrist extension movements indicate motor learning. Acceleration was measured in g; a symbol for the average acceleration produced by gravity at the Earth's surface.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Training 1(Immediately), Post-Training 2 (30 Minutes), Post-Training 3 (60 Minutes)
Population: No sufficient data collected.