Skip to content

Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip System Post Approval Study

Multicenter Post Approval Study of the Trilogy AB(R) Acetabular System

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00715026
Enrollment
31
Registered
2008-07-15
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2014-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis, Congenital Hip Dysplasia, Osteoarthritis, Traumatic Arthritis

Keywords

Arthritis, Total Hip, Ceramic, Hip Replacement, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Joint Disease

Brief summary

This is a post-approval study with prospective enrollment in the United States and a retrospective enrollment outside the United States to obtain functional, quality of life and radiographic data, which will facilitate assessment of the clinical performance of the Zimmer Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip System.

Detailed description

To obtain functional, quality of life and radiographic data to evaluate the clinical performance of the Zimmer Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip System in primary total hip replacement surgery.

Interventions

DEVICETrilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant System

Total hip replacement with ceramic on ceramic treatment surfaces.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-obese patients * The patient is a good candidate for a primary hip arthroplasty using the Zimmer Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip System. * Patient is willing and able to give informed consent to participate in the follow-up program. * Patient is suitable for surgery and able to participate in the follow-up program.

Exclusion criteria

* Skeletally immature * Rheumatoid arthritis * Osteoradionecrosis * Infection * Nerve or muscle disease that may have a negative affect on gait or weight bearing * Loss of abductor musculature in the affected limb * Poor bone stock * Poor skin coverage around the hip joint * Rapid disease progression as obvious by joint destruction or bone absorption seen on x-ray * Previous total or cemented hemi-arthroplasty of the affected hip * Previous pinning or plating of the affected hip * Patients with heavy labor jobs or extreme activity levels * Patients who participate in sports activities or require deep flexion * Patients who are obese * Patients who have other disabilities * Patients who are unwilling or unable to give consent, or to comply with the protocol and follow-up program.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harris Hip ScorePre-op, 3 Month Post-Op and Annual Post-Op visits through 5 YearsThe Harris Hip Score was developed to assess hip disabilities and methods of treatment and has been in use for decades. It evaluates patients on the basis of pain, function, absence of deformity and range of motion. The Harris Hip Score could range from 0 to 100. Scores less then 70 are poor, scores 70 to 79 are fair, scores 80 to 89 are good, and scores 90 to 100 are excellent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.At all follow-up visits through 5 Years and postcard follow-up 6 - 10 YearsA total of 37 Adverse Events were reported. There have been no UADEs reported in this study population. At the time of site closure all AEs were resolved or tolerated. Implant survivorship not reportable due to early study termination.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant System
Post Approval Study of Device. Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant System : Total hip replacement with ceramic on ceramic treatment surfaces.
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudySurgery done on non-study consented hip1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTrilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant System
Age, Continuous58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Harris Hip Score

The Harris Hip Score was developed to assess hip disabilities and methods of treatment and has been in use for decades. It evaluates patients on the basis of pain, function, absence of deformity and range of motion. The Harris Hip Score could range from 0 to 100. Scores less then 70 are poor, scores 70 to 79 are fair, scores 80 to 89 are good, and scores 90 to 100 are excellent.

Time frame: Pre-op, 3 Month Post-Op and Annual Post-Op visits through 5 Years

Population: Data was received on 24 subjects/25 hips at preop, on 17 subjects/18 hips at 3 months, and on 4 subjects at 1 year prior to the early termination of the study. Each hip, whether unilateral or bilateral, was counted separately. Early study termination was done due to voluntary removal of the device from the US market.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemHarris Hip ScorePreop Harris Hip Scores52.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemHarris Hip Score3 Months Harris Hip Score68.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.11
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemHarris Hip Score1 Year Harris Hip Scores70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.54
Secondary

Continued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.

A total of 37 Adverse Events were reported. There have been no UADEs reported in this study population. At the time of site closure all AEs were resolved or tolerated. Implant survivorship not reportable due to early study termination.

Time frame: At all follow-up visits through 5 Years and postcard follow-up 6 - 10 Years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemContinued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.SAEs - Not device related11 adverse events
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemContinued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.AEs - Not device related21 adverse events
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemContinued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.AEs - Definitely device related3 adverse events
Trilogy AB Acetabular Hip Implant SystemContinued Assessment of Implant Survivorship and Incidences of Adverse Events.AEs - Uncertain relation to device2 adverse events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026