Skip to content

The Effect of PTH(1-84) or Alendronate on Reduction of Back Pain in Postmenopausal Women With an Osteoporosis Related Vertebral Fracture(s) (FP-005-IM)

A 24-week, International, Multi Centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, Phase IV Clinical Trial Investigating Changes in Back Pain in Postmenopausal Women With an Osteoporosis Related Vertebral Fracture(s) Treated With Either 100 µg PTH(1-84) Daily or 70 mg Alendronate Weekly

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00713258
Enrollment
75
Registered
2008-07-11
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2012-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

Postmenopausal women, Back pain, Osteoporosis related fracture

Brief summary

The primary objective of this trial is to show that PTH(1-84) is superior to alendronate in reducing back pain intensity over a 24-week treatment period in postmenopausal women with an osteoporosis related vertebral fracture(s). Secondly the objectives are to investigate any differences in patient reported outcomes between the two treatment arms over a 24-week treatment period in postmenopausal women with an osteoporosis related vertebral fracture(s).

Interventions

100 µg PTH(1-84) daily

DRUGAlendronate

70 mg alendronate weekly

Sponsors

Nycomed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal women with a T-score ≤ -1.5 SD and at least one osteoporosis related vertebral fracture. Chronic back pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous/current treatment and medical history.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Back Pain Intensity During 24 Weeks of Treatment Using a Numerical Rating Scale.Baseline and 24 weeks treatmentThe daily patient assessment of intensity of back pain is based on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) which is an 11-point numerical rating scale (from 0-10 with 0 = no pain and 10 = unendurable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Physical Disability and Patient Reported Outcomes During 24 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline and 24 weeks treatmentThree times during the trial the patients will be asked how their pain affects their ability to manage everyday life. This information will be collected by use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The questions relate to daily life activities and indicate to what extent a person's functional level is restricted by pain. ODI scores from 0 = no disability to 100 = maximum disability. Patient reported outcomes will be assessed by using two questionnaires related to health status and quality of life status.

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PTH (1-84)
PTH (1-84) + placebo alendronate * PTH (1-84): powder and solvent for solution for injection * placebo alendronate: capsule
41
Alendronate
PTH (1-84) placebo + alendronate * PTH (1-84) placebo: powder and solvent for solution for injection * alendronate: capsule
34
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event24
Overall StudyNon-Compliance21
Overall StudyOther11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAlendronatePTH (1-84)
Age at onset of menopause48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43
48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.25
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68
Age Continuous70.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.84
70.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14
Family history of osteoporosis22 patients9 patients13 patients
Mean NRS score6.49 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56
6.36 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
6.60 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
75 participants34 participants41 participants
Vertebral Fracture at Baseline3.21 vertebral fractures per patient
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27
2.94 vertebral fractures per patient
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.97
3.44 vertebral fractures per patient
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 4113 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 415 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Back Pain Intensity During 24 Weeks of Treatment Using a Numerical Rating Scale.

The daily patient assessment of intensity of back pain is based on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) which is an 11-point numerical rating scale (from 0-10 with 0 = no pain and 10 = unendurable pain).

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks treatment

Population: The number of participants analyzed is 0, because the reduction of the sample size from 300 to 75 subjects due to early trial termination resulted in a small number of subjects with data available. This is far below the number needed to demonstrate a significant difference between the comparison groups and the data have no statistical validity.

Secondary

Change in Physical Disability and Patient Reported Outcomes During 24 Weeks of Treatment

Three times during the trial the patients will be asked how their pain affects their ability to manage everyday life. This information will be collected by use of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire. The questions relate to daily life activities and indicate to what extent a person's functional level is restricted by pain. ODI scores from 0 = no disability to 100 = maximum disability. Patient reported outcomes will be assessed by using two questionnaires related to health status and quality of life status.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks treatment

Population: The number of participants analyzed is 0, because the reduction of the sample size from 300 to 75 subjects due to early trial termination resulted in a small number of subjects with data available. This is far below the number needed to demonstrate a significant difference between the comparison groups and the data have no statistical validity.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026