Skip to content

Morphine After Radiofrequency Ablation of Painful Bone Metastases in Patients With Cancer

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Radiofrequency Ablation for Reducing Refractory Pain From Bone Metastases

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00712712
Acronym
MEDOR
Enrollment
78
Registered
2008-07-10
Start date
2007-12-24
Completion date
2016-03-16
Last updated
2025-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Cancer, Pain, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Keywords

bone metastases, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, pain

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Morphine may reduce pain in patients who have undergone radiofrequency ablation to remove bone metastases. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well morphine works after radiofrequency ablation of painful bone metastases in patients with cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Measure the efficacy of morphine sulfate at 8 weeks after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of bone metastases. Secondary * Assess minimum and average pain and analyze use of morphine sulfate before and after RFA. * Determine disease progression by CT scan of bone. * Evaluate the percentage of relief associated with RFA, specifically patient satisfaction, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and physical performance during RFA. * Assess complications and side effects related to RFA and the evolution of possible side effects associated with morphine sulfate therapy. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients complete a pain questionnaire over 1 week before undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Patients also complete questionnaires about pain, physical performance, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety at baseline. Bone metastases are removed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). After surgery, patients receive acetaminophen and patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) morphine sulfate. PCA morphine sulfate continues with a dose increase of 50% bolus every 24 hours. Patients with maximum pain less than or equal to that at inclusion receive standard morphine sulfate therapy instead. Data concerning the total dose of PCA morphine sulfate; minimum, average, and maximum pain intensity; side effects and complications of RFA; and total dose of morphine sulfate (or equivalent) is collected daily. Pain is assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after RFA. Patients complete follow-up questionnaires about physical performance, QOL, and anxiety at 12 weeks. Patients also undergo a CT scan at 12 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGAcetaminophen

Intravenous administration of paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

DRUGMorphine Sulfate

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), allowing morphine consumption to be titrated to the patient's needs and thus allowing morphine doses to be adapted to an increase in pain in the patient's post-operative period or a rapid analgesic effect of radiofrequency.

OTHERQuestionnaire administration

Pain notebook will allow the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned, containing information on : * The intensity of the minimum, average and maximum pain of the last 24 months. hours as well as the intensity of the pain of the moment according to a scale 11-point digital, * the background morphine analgesic treatment during the last 24 hours, * the morphine analgesic treatment taken during painful attacks, * the possible undesirable effects of morphine treatment. * the morphinic, non-morphinic and co-antalgic treatment is noted, as well as that the total dose of oral morphine or oral morphine equivalent

PROCEDUREQuality-of-life assessment

Patients' quality of life will be assessed using the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 at inclusion in the study and at 8 weeks after radiofrequency. ablation.

PROCEDURERadiofrequency ablation

Recent technique of thermal destruction of tumors. This technique consists of inserting an electrode needle into the tumour under X-ray or ultrasound guidance or intraoperatively under laparoscopy for example. This needle carries a current or a light wave depending on the characteristics of the generator to which it is connected (radiofrequency, laser). Radio frequencies are radiation non-ionising electromagnets. In this context of tissue ablathermia wavelengths ranging from 400kHz to 500kHz.

Sponsors

Institut Bergonié
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed cancer * Primary or unknown origin * Painful bone metastases despite radiotherapy or symptomatic relapse into previously irradiated area with no possibility of repeating radiotherapy * Bone metastases may have been treated with bisphosphonates * Osteolytic bone or joint (lytic and condensed) confirmed by CT scan and meeting the following criteria: * Lesion size ≤ 5 cm * No more than 2 painful bone metastases * If 2 lesions are to be treated, distinct anatomical locations can be treated at the same time * Metastatic bone lesions of the pelvis, sacrum (in absence of canal involvement), ribs, or long bones allowed * Pain located at the tumor or in the area * Maximum pain in the last 24 hours \> 4 points (numerical scale to 11 points) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Life expectancy \> 3 months * Platelet count \> 50,000/μL * Prothrombin \< 50% * Activated cephalin time ≤ 1.5 times normal * Not pregnant * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No geographical, social, or psychiatric reason that would preclude follow up PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy * At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy or bisphosphonates * At least 1 week since beginning new painkiller therapy or anticoagulation treatment * More than 30 days since participation in another drug study * More than 30 days since prior surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Maximum Pain Level Decreased by ≥ 2 Points at 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to an 11-point numerical scale Rate of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their most intense pain, 2 months after the radiofrequency ablation. This rate is calculated for the evaluable population for the principal outcome measure. This rate is equal to the ratio of the number of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their maximum pain divided by the size of the evaluable population. The response rate considered acceptable is 50%, above this threshold the treatment will be considered potentially effective and may be proposed in phase III.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)First algology assessment at pre-selection visitAccording to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the pre-selection visit.
Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per DayPreselection: First algology visit (within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation)Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Difference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency AblationInclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to a discrete 11-points numerical scale. Increased/decreased pain is considered as a variation of at least one point on the numerical scale. If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective.
Bolus Dose in mg Administered by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)24 hours after radiofrequencyAs a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)InclusionQuality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions : 5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties; 1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Total Intravenous Morphine Dose (mg)24 hours after radiofrequencyTotal intravenous dose of morphine 24 hours after the radiofrequency was assessed during the patient's hospital stay. As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone Metastases
Patient who has undergone radiofrequency ablation of bone metastases, localized, causing pain refractory to radiotherapy or not accessible to new irradiation, biphosphonates and well-conducted morphine analgesic treatment.
78
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath8
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyRadiofrequency not done3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone Metastases
Age, Continuous66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
78 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
10 / 71
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Maximum Pain Level Decreased by ≥ 2 Points at 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to an 11-point numerical scale Rate of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their most intense pain, 2 months after the radiofrequency ablation. This rate is calculated for the evaluable population for the principal outcome measure. This rate is equal to the ratio of the number of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their maximum pain divided by the size of the evaluable population. The response rate considered acceptable is 50%, above this threshold the treatment will be considered potentially effective and may be proposed in phase III.

Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.~If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesPercentage of Participants With Maximum Pain Level Decreased by ≥ 2 Points at 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)83.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Bolus Dose in mg Administered by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)

As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Time frame: 24 hours after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesBolus Dose in mg Administered by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA)1.0 mgStandard Deviation 6.1
Secondary

Difference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation

Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to a discrete 11-points numerical scale. Increased/decreased pain is considered as a variation of at least one point on the numerical scale. If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective.

Time frame: Inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesDifference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency AblationIncreased pain4 Participants
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesDifference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency AblationUnchanged pain2 Participants
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesDifference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency AblationDecreased pain49 Participants
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected one day before radiofrequency (J-1).

Time frame: Algology assessment one day before radiofrequency (J-1)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected one day after radiofrequency (J+1).

Time frame: Algology assessment one day after radiofrequency: J+1

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the discharge from hospital visit.

Time frame: Algology assessment at the discharge from hospital visit

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 7 days after discharge from hospital.

Time frame: Algology assessment 7 days after discharge from hospital

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 1 month after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Algology assessment 1 month after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 2 months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Algology assessment 2 months after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 3 months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Algology assessment 3 months after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the pre-selection visit.

Time frame: First algology assessment at pre-selection visit

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain8.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)

According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency. Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: * Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, * Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) * J-1: one day before radiofrequency * J+1: One day after radiofrequency * Discharge from hospital * 7 days after discharge from hospital * 1 month after radiofrequency * 2 months after radiofrequency * 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the inclusion visit.

Time frame: Second algology assessment at inclusion visit

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Minimal pain2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Average pain5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesIntensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum)Maximum pain8.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Preselection: First algology visit (within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 182.9
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: J-1 (One day before radiofrequency)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 132.8
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Discharge from hospital

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 115.3
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: 7 days after discharge

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 103.1
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: 1 month after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 148
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 148
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: 3 months after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day50.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 169.5
Secondary

Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day

Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned. In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.

Time frame: Inclusion: Second algology visit (One week after the first algology visit)

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesOral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day60.0 mg morphine equivalents/dayStandard Deviation 182.9
Secondary

Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)

Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions : 5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties; 1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.

Time frame: 2 months after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Physical functioning60.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Role functioning50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.9
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Emotional functioning62.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Cognitive functioning50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Social functioning50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Global health status/QoL50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Fatigue55.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Nausea and vomiting0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Pain50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Dyspnoea33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Insomnia33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Appetite loss33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Constipation33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.4
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Diarrhoea0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Financial difficulties0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Secondary

Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)

Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions : 5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties; 1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.

Time frame: Inclusion

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Physical functioning46.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Role functioning33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Emotional functioning58.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Cognitive functioning66.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Social functioning33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Global health status/QoL41.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Fatigue66.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Nausea and vomiting16.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Pain83.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Dyspnoea33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Insomnia33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.5
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Appetite loss0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Constipation33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.1
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Diarrhoea0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesStandardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30)Financial difficulties0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Secondary

Total Intravenous Morphine Dose (mg)

Total intravenous dose of morphine 24 hours after the radiofrequency was assessed during the patient's hospital stay. As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Time frame: 24 hours after radiofrequency

Population: Pre-selected patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Excluded patients who died, were lost to follow-up, or dropped out of the study within eight weeks after radiofrequency.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Patient Who Has Undergone Radiofrequency Ablation of Bone MetastasesTotal Intravenous Morphine Dose (mg)3.0 mgStandard Deviation 72.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026