Skip to content

Abuse Liability of Suboxone Versus Subutex

Reinforcing Effects of Intravenous Buprenorphine Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone in Buprenorphine-maintained Intravenous Drug Users (P05207)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00710385
Enrollment
19
Registered
2008-07-04
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2016-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid-related Disorders

Brief summary

The study is designed to compare the abuse liabilities of intravenous buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone in individuals who are physically dependent on sublingual buprenorphine. We hypothesize that the abuse liability of buprenorphine/naloxone is lower than that of buprenorphine alone.

Detailed description

Drug dependence is a major international public health problem of which opioid dependence, notably involving heroin, is a major component. Opioid dependence affects an estimated 13 million injection drug users (IDUs) worldwide. The high health service costs for the treatment of diseases related to non-medical drug use and the high cost to society of drug-related behavior have prompted researchers to seek new medications and treatment strategies for opioid dependence. Buprenorphine, a mu-opiate receptor partial agonist and kappa-opiate receptor antagonist, is one such new medication that has had a significant role in expanding access to effective opioid dependence treatment. It is available as Subutex (buprenorphine alone) or Suboxone (a combination of buprenorphine and naloxone). Although it is commonly believed that the abuse potential of buprenorphine is low, numerous countries have reported illicit diversion of buprenorphine and a growing population of buprenorphine abusers. Theoretically, Suboxone would have lower abuse potential. When used sublingually, as prescribed, the amount of naloxone absorbed is negligible. However, if a patient crushes the tablet and attempts to inject or sniff the medication, the naloxone will become effective as an opioid antagonist and may precipitate withdrawal signs and symptoms in individuals dependent on full opioid agonists and/or attenuate the euphoric effects of the buprenorphine that is also contained in the medication. To date, few laboratory studies have evaluated the abuse liability of buprenorphine in humans using a drug self-administration protocol. We are proposing to evaluate the abuse potential of intravenous (IV) buprenorphine compared to IV buprenorphine/naloxone in buprenorphine-maintained injection drug users (IDUs), incorporating self-administration procedures with other measures of opioid effects. The proposed study will investigate the conditions that affect the self-administration of IV buprenorphine by buprenorphine abusers. The primary aim of the study is to compare the reinforcing effects of IV buprenorphine and IV buprenorphine/naloxone in IDUs maintained on different doses of sublingual buprenorphine (2, 8, and 24 mg/day). Secondary aims of the study are to compare the subjective, performance and physiological effects of IV buprenorphine and IV buprenorphine/naloxone. IV-administered placebo (saline), naloxone alone, and heroin alone will be tested as neutral, negative, and positive control conditions, respectively. Participants (N=12 completers) will reside on an inpatient unit (the General Clinical Research Unit, GCRU) during a 7 to 8-week study. This research will provide useful information for clinicians treating opioid dependent individuals with buprenorphine, and importantly, will provide information about the abuse potential and effects of buprenorphine on multiple measures of human functioning.

Interventions

DRUGHeroin

Heroin (25 mg)

DRUGNaloxone

.4 mg

DRUGLow Bup Dose

4 and 8 mg

DRUGHigh Bup Dose

8mg and 16 mg

DRUGLow Bup/Nal Dose

Buprenorphine/Naloxone 4/1 mg, 8/2 mg

DRUGHigh Bup/Nal Dose

Buprenorphine/Naloxone 8/2 mg, 16/4 mg

Placebo control administration

Sponsors

Schering-Plough
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) IV criteria for heroin dependence * No major mood, psychotic, or anxiety disorder * Physically healthy * Able to perform study procedures * 21-45 years of age * Normal body weight * Current use of i.v. opioids in amounts and/or frequencies that meet or exceed those used in the proposed study (1-2 bags of heroin per occasion at least twice per day) * Self-administer at least 4 mg i.v. buprenorphine above placebo levels during the dose run up phase

Exclusion criteria

* DSM IV criteria for dependence on drugs other than opioids, nicotine or caffeine * Participants requesting treatment * Participants on parole or probation * Pregnancy or lactation * Birth, miscarriage or abortion within 6 months * Current or recent history of significant violent behavior * Current major Axis I psychopathology, other than opioid dependence (e.g., mood disorder with functional impairment or suicide risk, schizophrenia), that might interfere with ability to participate in the study * aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 3 times the upper limit of normal * Significant suicide risk * Current chronic pain * Sensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to opioids * Current or recent (past 30 days) physical dependence on or treatment with methadone, buprenorphine, or the buprenorphine/naloxone combination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drug's BreakpointSingle measurement taken following each of the 7 IV experimental dosesMeasure of a drug's reinforcing effects. The Breakpoint is the point at which the participant stop performing an operant task (clicks on a mouse) in order to received the drug. Therefore, the reported breakpoint is the total amount of work the participant was willing to perform to receive the dose being tested

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drug LikingPeak (highest) rating obtained following drug administration throughout the entire 3 hr sessionParticipant's subjective ratings of how much they Like the dose they just received on a scale of 0 -100.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment dates: September 10, 2007 - August 13, 2008 Location: Medical clinic

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Challenge Doses
This study employs a within-subjects design, all participant experience all challenge doses.
12
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDid not qualify1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyUndisclosed back pain1
Overall StudyUndisclosed excessive methadone use1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChallenge Doses
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Drug's Breakpoint

Measure of a drug's reinforcing effects. The Breakpoint is the point at which the participant stop performing an operant task (clicks on a mouse) in order to received the drug. Therefore, the reported breakpoint is the total amount of work the participant was willing to perform to receive the dose being tested

Time frame: Single measurement taken following each of the 7 IV experimental doses

Population: Heroin users, not seeking treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeroinDrug's Breakpoint1200 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 200
NaloxoneDrug's Breakpoint10 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 10
Low Bup DoseDrug's Breakpoint1100 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 180
High Bup DoseDrug's Breakpoint1200 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 190
Lower Bup/Nal DoseDrug's Breakpoint300 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 100
High Bup/Nal DoseDrug's Breakpoint750 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 175
PlaceboDrug's Breakpoint0 number of clicks on a mouseStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Drug Liking

Participant's subjective ratings of how much they Like the dose they just received on a scale of 0 -100.

Time frame: Peak (highest) rating obtained following drug administration throughout the entire 3 hr session

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeroinDrug Liking41.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 5
NaloxoneDrug Liking3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Low Bup DoseDrug Liking29.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
High Bup DoseDrug Liking42.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 5
Lower Bup/Nal DoseDrug Liking10.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
High Bup/Nal DoseDrug Liking27 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
PlaceboDrug Liking1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026