Skip to content

Improved Patient Recovery After Anesthesia With Hypercapnia Hyperpnoea

Improved Patient Recovery After Anesthesia With Hypercapnia Hyperpnoea

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00708526
Enrollment
22
Registered
2008-07-02
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2022-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercapnia

Keywords

hypercapnia, hyperpnoea, accelerated recovery

Brief summary

The proposed study will measure the time from the end of surgery until the time patients meet the discharge criteria from the postoperative anesthesia care unit and the time from the end of surgery until the patients regained cognitive function after anesthesia.

Detailed description

Hypercapnia has been used in conjunction with hyperpnoea to provide a more rapid return of responsiveness after inhaled anesthesia. In our first clinical study with isoflurane we confirmed that the time from turning off the vaporizer to opening of eyes was shortened by an average of 62% when the minute ventilation was elevated and the end tidal carbon dioxide concentration was kept at 52 mmHg rather than 28 mmHg during emergence. In our second study we found that hypercapnia and hyperpnoea accelerated recovery proportionately for sevoflurane and desflurane. The benefits of accelerating subject recovery in the operating room may extend to the entire recovery period if the subject is more alert and easier to care for when they arrive in the post anesthesia care unit.

Interventions

OTHERstandard of care for phase one anesthesia care

Patients received intravenous fentanyl at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. Anesthesia was induced with a remifentanil infusion, lidocaine, propofol, and rocuronium or succinylcholine at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Maintenance anesthesia was 6% end tidal desflurane with oxygen flows of 2 L/min (though clinicians could deviate from this at their discretion). Clinicians were directed to maintain blood pressure at ±20% of baseline. A baseline remifentanil infusion was used throughout each case, and both remifentanil and fentanyl were titrated at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Ventilation was adjusted to maintain an end tidal carbon dioxide concentration (EtCO2) of 35 mmHg. Ondansetron 4 mg was given prophylactically before the end of surgery.

DEVICEQuick Emergence Device

The Quick Emergence Device is placed between the endotracheal tube and the anesthesia breathing circuit to enable hypercapnia when ventilation is increased. The end-tidal gas sampling line is connected between the device and the endotracheal tube connector. Minute ventilation is doubled and the EtCO2 is elevated to approximately 48 mmHg from the previous maintenance level of 35 mmHg.

Sponsors

Anecare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults * ASA class I-III * both genders * scheduled to undergo eye surgery at the Moran Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

* a history of renal or hepatic disease, * chronic alcohol or drug abuse, * disabling neuropsychiatric disorder, * hypersensitivity or unusual response to other halogenated anesthetics, * pulmonary hypertension, * increased intracranial pressure, * seizure disorder * personal/familial history of malignant hyperthermia. * currently being treated with known hepatic enzyme-inducing drugs (e.g., phenobarbital, dilantin or isoniazid) * or with drugs known to alter anesthetic requirements (e.g., opiates, clonidine, alpha2 agonists, alcohol, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, barbiturates, benzodiazepines or other tranquilizers). * intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatories. * have received general anesthesia within the previous 7 days, * received any investigational drug within the previous 28 days, * participated in a previous isoflurane or desflurane study * Female subjects can be neither pregnant nor breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recovery From Anesthesiaup to 2 hoursaverage time in minutes from the time the surgeon finished closing the surgical incision until the time the investigator in the postoperative care unit determined that the patients meet the discharge criteria from the postoperative anesthesia care unit (their vital signs had been stable for at least 30 min, their pain scores were less than the tolerable pain scores, they could sit up without dizziness or nausea, and their Aldrete score was ≥8).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return of Cognitive Functionup to 30 minutesaverage time in minutes from the time the surgeon finished closing the surgical incision at the end of surgery until the patients could correctly state their full name, the current year and their day, month and year of birth

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from March 28-August 25, 2008 through the surgery schedule at the Moran Eye Center

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Quick Emergence Device (QED)
At the end of surgery, the Quick Emergence Device was placed between the endotracheal tube and the anesthesia breathing circuit. Minute ventilation was doubled and the end tidal carbon dioxide concentration (EtCO2) was elevated to approximately 48 mmHg.
11
Standard of Care
At the end of surgery, the minute ventilation and EtCO2 remained at normal levels. The Quick Emergence Device was not used.
11
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQuick Emergence Device (QED)Standard of CareTotal
Age, Continuous
Age
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants11 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Recovery From Anesthesia

average time in minutes from the time the surgeon finished closing the surgical incision until the time the investigator in the postoperative care unit determined that the patients meet the discharge criteria from the postoperative anesthesia care unit (their vital signs had been stable for at least 30 min, their pain scores were less than the tolerable pain scores, they could sit up without dizziness or nausea, and their Aldrete score was ≥8).

Time frame: up to 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quick Emergence Device (QED)Recovery From Anesthesia53.0 minutesStandard Deviation 15.2
Standard of CareRecovery From Anesthesia62.9 minutesStandard Deviation 28.8
Comparison: We compared times for discharge criteria after general anesthesia with and without the QED.p-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Return of Cognitive Function

average time in minutes from the time the surgeon finished closing the surgical incision at the end of surgery until the patients could correctly state their full name, the current year and their day, month and year of birth

Time frame: up to 30 minutes

Population: number of participants determined by protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Quick Emergence Device (QED)Return of Cognitive Function10.9 minutesStandard Deviation 5.1
Standard of CareReturn of Cognitive Function18.2 minutesStandard Deviation 9.7
Comparison: The effect of the use of hypercapnia and increased ventilation on the time to recovery events was compared using multivariate analysis of variance with the Hotelling's two sample T2.-test and the two-tailed unpaired t-test; individual comparisons were by Bonferroni adjusted two tailed unpaired t-tests. The data was tested for normality before identifying statistical significance.p-value: 0.039t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026