Skip to content

rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System Pivotal Study

A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Investigation of rhBMP-2 and Compression Resistant Matrix With the CD HORIZON® Spinal System for Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00707265
Acronym
CRM
Enrollment
463
Registered
2008-06-30
Start date
2002-03-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System as a method of facilitating spinal fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease.

Detailed description

This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System for posterolateral fusion treatment of patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease versus the control group of autogenous bone with the CD HORIZON® Spinal System. The investigational treatment was the open bilateral posterolateral implantation of the rhBMP-2/CRM/CD HORIZON® Spinal System. One investigational implant was placed across two adjacent transverse processes on each side of the spine during the spinal fusion procedure. The control treatment was the bilateral posterolateral implantation of the autogenous bone harvested from the iliac crest with the CD HORIZON® Spinal System.

Interventions

The rhBMP-2/CRM component of the investigational device consists of recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and a compression resistant matrix (CRM) carrier consisting of an absorbable collagen sponge imbedded with biphasic calcium phosphate. The posterior spinal fixation system, the CD HORIZON® Spinal System, is a commercially available rod-based spinal system intended for temporary stabilization of the spine in order to facilitate fusion. The CD HORIZON® Spinal System is available in either titanium or stainless steel. For this study, only titanium implant components will be used.

DEVICEAutograft/CD HORIZON® Spinal System

The control will be autogenous bone taken from the iliac crest of the patient and placed bilaterally across two adjacent transverse processes and used in conjunction with the CD HORIZON® Spinal System. When used as a posterior spine thoracic/lumbar system, the CD HORIZON® CANNULATED M8 MULTI-AXIAL SCREW components are intended for several indications including degenerative disc disease.

Sponsors

Medtronic Spinal and Biologics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each patient participating in this clinical trial must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: 1. Has degenerative disc disease as noted by back pain of discogenic origin, with or without leg pain, with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history of pain and radiographic studies: 2. Requires fusion of a single level disc space from L1 to S1. 3. Has not responded to non-operative treatment (e.g., bed rest, physical therapy, medications, spinal injections, manipulation, and/or TENS) for a period of 6 months. 4. If of child-bearing potential, patient is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees to use adequate contraception for 1 year following surgery.

Exclusion criteria

A patient meeting any of the following criteria is to be excluded from this clinical trial: 1. Has primary diagnosis of a spinal disorder other than degenerative disc disease with Grade 1 or less spondylolisthesis at the involved level. 2. Had previous spinal fusion surgical procedure at the involved level. 3. Requires spinal fusion at more than one lumbar level. 4. Has been previously diagnosed with osteopenia. 5. Has presence of active malignancy or prior history of malignancy (except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin). 6. Has a history of autoimmune disease (e.g. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or dermatomyositis). 7. Has a history of exposure to injectable collagen or silicone implants. 8. Has received treatment with an investigational therapy within 28 days prior to implantation surgery or such treatment is planned during the 16 weeks following rhBMP 2/CRM implantation. 9. Has received any previous exposure to any/all BMP's of either human or animal extraction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Success24 monthsA patient will be considered an overall success if all of the following conditions are met: 1. fusion; 2. pain/disability (Oswestry) improvement; 3. maintenance or improvement in neurological status; 4. no serious adverse event classified as implant associated or implant/surgical procedure associated; 5. no additional surgical procedure classified as a failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain/Disability Status24 monthsThe self-administered Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire will be used. Success will be defined as pain/disability improvement postoperatively according to the definition: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score \>= 15 points
Overall Neurological Status24 monthsNeurological status will be assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using a neurological status scale. Neurological status is based on four types of measurements (sections): motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raise. Overall measure of neurological status will be based on success statuses in the four parameters.
General Health Status24 monthsThe Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results can be summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). Success will be defined as a maintenance or improvement in status postoperatively as compared to the preoperative condition. To be classified as a success, the following criteria must be met: PCSPostop - PCSPreop \>= 0; MCSPostop - MCSPreop \>= 0
Back Pain24 monthsNumerical rating scales will be used to evaluate pain intensity and duration. The pain score (0 min, 20 Max) is derived by adding the numerical rating scores from the pain intensity (0-10, with a score of 0 representing no pain and a score of 10 representing pain as bad as it could be.) and duration scales (0-10, with a score of 0 being pain none of the time and a score of 10 being pain all of the time). Success for back and leg pain is described as follows: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score \>=0
Fusion24 monthsFusion is defined as: 1. Evidence of bridging trabecular bone. 2. No evidence of motion. 3. Absence of cracking, as evidenced by radiolucent lines completely through the fusion mass.
Operative TimeAt the time of operation
Blood LossAt the time of operation
Hospital DaysAt the time of discharge
Leg Pain24 monthsNumerical rating scales will be used to evaluate pain intensity and duration. The pain score (0 min, 20 Max) is derived by adding the numerical rating scores from the pain intensity (0-10, with a score of 0 representing no pain and a score of 10 representing pain as bad as it could be.) and duration scales (0-10, with a score of 0 being pain none of the time and a score of 10 being pain all of the time). Success for back and leg pain is described as follows: Preoperative Score - Postoperative Score \>=0

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026