Skip to content

Ibuprofen Extended-Release Dental Pain Study

Ibuprofen 600 mg Extended-Release (ER) Multiple-Dose Dental Pain Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00707057
Enrollment
256
Registered
2008-06-30
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2011-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Post-Operative Pain, Third Molar Extraction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of Ibuprofen 600 mg Extended-Release Tablets in a study of dental pain following extraction of third molar teeth.

Detailed description

This is a single-center, multiple-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of Ibuprofen 600 mg Extended-Release Tablets in a study of dental pain following extraction of third molar teeth. The surgery will consist of surgical extraction of 1-2 impacted third molars, of which one must be a mandibular impaction that is partially impacted in either tissue or bone. Subjects will be stratified according to baseline pain intensity, as rated on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)and gender.

Interventions

DRUGIbuprofen 600 mg Extended-Release Tablets

Ibuprofen 600 mg Extended-Release Tablet: One 600 mg tablet taken orally every 12 hours or twice daily (BID). Each dose was administered with at least 6 ounces of water. Dose 1 was administered at hour 0, Dose 2 was administered at hour 12, Dose 3 was administered at hour 24 and Dose 4 was administered at hour 36.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo: One matching placebo tablet was taken orally every 12 hours or twice daily (BID). Each dose was administered with at least 6 ounces of water. Dose 1 was administered at hour 0, Dose 2 was administered at hour 12, Dose 3 was administered at hour 24 and Dose 4 was administered at hour 36.

Sponsors

AAIPharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Jean Brown Research
CollaboratorOTHER
SCOLR Pharma, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females 16 to 45 years of age; * Outpatients scheduled to undergo surgical extraction of 1-2 impacted third molar(s), one of which must be a mandibular impaction that is partially impacted in either tissue or bone; * At least a score of 5 on the 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) at baseline; * Use of only the following preoperative medication(s) / anesthetic(s): short-acting local anesthetic (e.g., mepivacaine or lidocaine) with or without vasoconstrictor and/or nitrous oxide; * Reliable, cooperative, and adequate intelligence to record the requested information on the analgesic questionnaire form; * Subjects (or the parent or legal guardian of subjects under the age of 18 years) are required to read, comprehend, and sign the informed consent. Subjects requiring a parent or legal guardian to sign the informed consent will be required to sign an assent; * Examined by the attending dentist or physician and medically cleared to participate in the study; and, * In general good health and have no contraindications to any of the study meds.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of a serious medical condition (e.g., poorly controlled hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes, significantly impaired cardiac, renal or hepatic function, hyper- or hypothyroidism); * Use of a prescription or nonprescription drug with which the administration of ibuprofen, celecoxib, any other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or acetaminophen, is contraindicated; * Acute local infection at the time of surgery that could confound the post-surgical evaluation; * Females who are pregnant, lactating, of child-bearing potential, or postmenopausal for less than 2 years and not using a medically approved method of contraception (i.e., oral, transdermal, or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine device, diaphragm, condom, abstinence, or surgical sterility), or females who test positive on a urine-based pregnancy test; * Presence or history (within 2 years of enrollment) of bleeding disorder(s) or peptic ulcer disease; * Presence or history (within the past year) of alcoholism or substance abuse. Subjects who are taking CNS or other psychotropic drugs (including St. John's Wort, or any other nutritional supplement known to have psychotropic effects) may be enrolled if they have been on stable doses of medication for at least 2 months, will maintain this dose throughout the study, and their condition is judged by the Principal Investigator to be well-controlled; * Habituation to analgesic drugs (i.e., routine use of oral analgesics 5 or more times per week); * History of allergic reaction (eg, asthma, rhinitis, swelling, shock, or hives) to ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin, celecoxib, any other NSAID, or acetaminophen; * Prior use of any type of analgesic or NSAID 5 half-lives of that drug or less before taking the first dose of study medication, except for pre-anesthetic medication and anesthesia for the procedure; * Ingestion of any caffeine-containing beverages, chocolate, or alcohol 4 hours or less before taking the first dose of study medication; * Has taken an investigational product within the past 30 days; * Has previously been entered into this study; and, * The subject is a member of the study site staff either directly involved with the study, an employee of the Sponsor, or a relative of study site personnel directly involved with the study or Sponsor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic Efficacy, as Measured by the Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Scalefrom baseline to 12 hours after dose 1Analgesic efficacy for the 8-12 hour measurement interval after dose 1 using Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID). An 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) was used to record pain intensity at baseline and 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 hours after dose 1. The scale went from 0 (no pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain). The outcome measure is based a mean of the sum of each of the five time points evaluated. The total time scale ranges from 0 to 50. Subjects were asked to select the number that best describes how much pain they had at the time of observation.
Durability of Effect as Measured by the Number of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Improvement in Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Baseline at All Three Assessment Periods of 24, 36, and 48 Hours24, 36, and 48 hoursResponse rate measured the durability of effect and was measured by the number of subjects achieving a reduction of at least 2 points (greater than or equal to 20%) from baseline on the 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) at all 3 assessment periods of 24, 36 and 48 hours. The scale went from 0 (no pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain). Subjects were asked to select the number that best describes how much pain they had at the time of observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage (%) of Subjects With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief Within 1 Hour of Dose 1Within 1 hour of Dose 1Percentage (percentage of total) of subjects with first perceptible relief within 1 hour of Dose 1. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief was 240 minutes.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Relief as Indicated by the Time Recorded on the Second Stopwatch Following First Perceptible ReliefWithin 4 hours post Dose 1Percentage(%) of subjects with confirmed first perceptible relief and meaningful relief after dose 1. Subjects that achieved both first perceptible relief and meaningful relief within the time allotted. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief is 240 minutes. Meaningful relief is a subjective definition, based on each subject's determination of pain
Analgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)0-12 hours after Dose 1The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity from baseline pain intensity, so that a higher value was indicative of a greater improvement. Time weighted SPID for each specified interval (scale ranges from 0 to 10; 0=no pain relief and 10= complete pain relief) was derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point, and adding them together for each scheduled time point within the time interval (e.g., 4-12 hours in case of SPID 4-12). Time weighted TOTPAR for each specified interval was similarly derived.
Duration of Relief After Dose 1Time to rescue or time of Dose 2 (up to 12 hours following dose 1)Duration of relief was defined as the time to treatment failure (i.e.,taking rescue medication, or withdrawing due to lack of efficacy) up to the 12-hour time point. For those withdrawing from the study due to lack of efficacy prior to taking dose 2 or rescue medication, time to treatment failure was the time from dose 1 to the last assesment time. For those discontinuing from the study for any other reason, the time to treatment failure was censored at the last assessment time.
Percentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 10-12 hours after taking Dose 1Percentage of participants who require rescue medication (Lortab) at or prior to hour 8, hour 10 and hour 12 were reported and 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding parameters were calculated.
Time to Confirmed First Perceptible ReliefWithin 4 hours post Dose 1When the subject was administered study medication at Time 0, the Study Coordinator started 2 stopwatches. In an effort to determine the exact moment that the subject began to obtain noticeable pain relief, the subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when initial relief was observed and again when meaningful relief was achieved. Time to confirmed first perceptible relief was defined as the time to first perceptible relief, provided that the subject also later stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief is 240 minutes.
Global Evaluation for Dose 1At 12 hours after Dose 1 or at time of rescueGlobal evaluation for dose 1, either at the time of rescue or at dose 2 (hour 12), whichever came first were summarized. At the 12-hour time point but before Dose 2, or within 1 minute of rescue medication use (if it occurred before hour 12), the subject was to provide a Global Evaluation of Dose 1 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS in response to the following command: Select the number that best describes how you would rate this medication as a pain-reliever (select one number only). The range went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent).
Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2At 24 hours or at time of rescue between 12 and 24 hoursGlobal evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 2 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 2 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).
Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3At 36 hours or at time rescue between 24 and 36 hoursGlobal evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 3 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 3 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).
Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4At 48 hours or at time of rescue between 36 and 48 hours.Global evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 4 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 4 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).
Pain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 124, 36, 48 hours after taking Dose 1Pain relief and pain intensity difference (PID) scores at individual time points were summarized by descriptive statistics. The PID at each time point prior to dose 2 was derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity, so that a higher value was indicative of a greater improvement. Range of possible scores could be from 0 (no improvement) to 5 (greatest possible improvement)
Time to Confirmed Meaningful ReliefWithin 4 hours post Dose 1When the subject was administered study medication at Time 0, the Study Coordinator started 2 stopwatches. To determine the exact moment that the subject began to notice pain relief, the subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when initial relief was observed and again when meaningful relief was achieved. Time to confirmed meaningful relief was achieved if both stopwatches were stopped within the 4 hour observation period, when both initial and meaningful relief were observed. Meaningful relief is a subjective definition, based on each subjects determination of pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Date First Subject Enrolled: 24 June 2008 Date Last Subject Enrolled: 11 October 2008 All subjects were to receive 4 doses of study drug or placebo at 12-hour intervals. Of the 12 subjects who prematurely discontinued study drug, 6 subjects received 1 dose of study drug, 2 subjects received 2 doses, and 4 subjects received 3 doses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ibuprofen 600mg ER
Participants received 600 mg 12-hour extended-release tablets twice daily (BID).
169
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablet twice daily (BID)
87
Total256

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDosed incorrectly01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject83

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboIbuprofen 600mg ERTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
35 Participants64 Participants99 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
52 Participants105 Participants157 Participants
Age Continuous18.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.25
18.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22
18.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.22
Region of Enrollment
United States
87 participants169 participants256 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants95 Participants142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
40 Participants74 Participants114 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1690 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1690 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Analgesic Efficacy, as Measured by the Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Scale

Analgesic efficacy for the 8-12 hour measurement interval after dose 1 using Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID). An 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) was used to record pain intensity at baseline and 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 hours after dose 1. The scale went from 0 (no pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain). The outcome measure is based a mean of the sum of each of the five time points evaluated. The total time scale ranges from 0 to 50. Subjects were asked to select the number that best describes how much pain they had at the time of observation.

Time frame: from baseline to 12 hours after dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy, as Measured by the Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Scale14.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.331
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy, as Measured by the Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Scale0.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.933
Comparison: The null versus alternative hypothesis regarding the analgesic efficacy using the SPID 8-12 was compared between the 2 treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)model with each subject's outcome being his/her SPID 8-12 as the dependent variable in the ANCOVA model with terms for gender, treatment, and baseline pain score categories (stratified as ≤7 and \>7).p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Primary

Durability of Effect as Measured by the Number of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Improvement in Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Baseline at All Three Assessment Periods of 24, 36, and 48 Hours

Response rate measured the durability of effect and was measured by the number of subjects achieving a reduction of at least 2 points (greater than or equal to 20%) from baseline on the 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) at all 3 assessment periods of 24, 36 and 48 hours. The scale went from 0 (no pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain). Subjects were asked to select the number that best describes how much pain they had at the time of observation.

Time frame: 24, 36, and 48 hours

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERDurability of Effect as Measured by the Number of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Improvement in Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Baseline at All Three Assessment Periods of 24, 36, and 48 Hours123 participants
PlaceboDurability of Effect as Measured by the Number of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Improvement in Pain Intensity Difference (PID) From Baseline at All Three Assessment Periods of 24, 36, and 48 Hours47 participants
Comparison: The null versus alternative hypothesis regarding the durability of analgesic efficacy using the PID scores at 24, 36, and 48 hours.An individual subject was to achieve the 2-point reduction at all 3 terminal time points in order to be defined as responder.p-value: <0.0017ANCOVA
Secondary

Analgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)

The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity from baseline pain intensity, so that a higher value was indicative of a greater improvement. Time weighted SPID for each specified interval (scale ranges from 0 to 10; 0=no pain relief and 10= complete pain relief) was derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point, and adding them together for each scheduled time point within the time interval (e.g., 4-12 hours in case of SPID 4-12). Time weighted TOTPAR for each specified interval was similarly derived.

Time frame: 0-12 hours after Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 0-12 hours54.59 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.83
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 0-4 hours16.84 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.854
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 4-8 hours25.94 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.013
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 4-12 hours43.38 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.851
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 0-12 hours37.20 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.791
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 0-4 hours11.64 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.222
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 4-8 hours17.88 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.158
Ibuprofen 600mg ERAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 4-12 hours29.49 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.654
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 4-12 hours0.67 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.617
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 0-12 hours12.05 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.114
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 0-12 hours0.45 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.378
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 0-4 hours3.18 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.749
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 4-8 hours0.24 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.034
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 4-8 hours5.34 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.393
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)SPID 0-4 hours-0.18 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.591
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy for the 0-12, 0-4, 4-8, and 4-12 Hour Dosing Intervals After Dose 1 Using Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) and Sum of Pain Intensity Difference(SPID)TOTPAR 4-12 hours9.92 Time weighted units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.411
Comparison: The PID at each time point prior to dose 2 was derived by substracting the pain intensity from the base line pain intensity, so that a higher value was indicative of a greater improvement. Time weighted SPID for each specified interval was derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous time point, and adding them together for each scheduled time point within the time interval. Time weighted TOTPAR for ech specified interval was similarly derived.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Duration of Relief After Dose 1

Duration of relief was defined as the time to treatment failure (i.e.,taking rescue medication, or withdrawing due to lack of efficacy) up to the 12-hour time point. For those withdrawing from the study due to lack of efficacy prior to taking dose 2 or rescue medication, time to treatment failure was the time from dose 1 to the last assesment time. For those discontinuing from the study for any other reason, the time to treatment failure was censored at the last assessment time.

Time frame: Time to rescue or time of Dose 2 (up to 12 hours following dose 1)

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERDuration of Relief After Dose 1720 Minutes
PlaceboDuration of Relief After Dose 1101 Minutes
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
Secondary

Global Evaluation for Dose 1

Global evaluation for dose 1, either at the time of rescue or at dose 2 (hour 12), whichever came first were summarized. At the 12-hour time point but before Dose 2, or within 1 minute of rescue medication use (if it occurred before hour 12), the subject was to provide a Global Evaluation of Dose 1 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS in response to the following command: Select the number that best describes how you would rate this medication as a pain-reliever (select one number only). The range went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent).

Time frame: At 12 hours after Dose 1 or at time of rescue

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation for Dose 16.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.536
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation for Dose 11.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.898
Comparison: Global evaluation for dose 1, either at the time of rescue or at dose 2 whichever came first were summarized by descriptive statistics based on non-missing data. The range went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent) units on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS).p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2

Global evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 2 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 2 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).

Time frame: At 24 hours or at time of rescue between 12 and 24 hours

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Global Evalution for Dose 26.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.914
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Maximum Relief for Dose 27.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.997
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Overall Relief for Dose 26.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.005
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Global Evalution for Dose 24.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.673
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Maximum Relief for Dose 25.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.864
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 2Overall Relief for Dose 24.46 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.588
Comparison: Global evaluation scores for dose 2 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics.~The subjects were to provide global evaluation of dose 2 study medication using a range that went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent) units on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Maximum relief scores for dose 2 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics.~The subjects were to provide maximum relief scores for dose 2 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Overall relief scores for dose 2 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics.~The subjects were to provide overall relief scores for dose 2 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3

Global evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 3 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 3 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).

Time frame: At 36 hours or at time rescue between 24 and 36 hours

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Global Evaluation for Dose 37.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.839
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Maximum Relief for Dose 37.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.922
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Overall Relief for Dose 36.76 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.942
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Global Evaluation for Dose 34.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.549
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Maximum Relief for Dose 35.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.805
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 3Overall Relief for Dose 35.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.634
Comparison: Global evaluation scores for dose 3 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide global evaluation of dose 3 study medication using a range that went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent) units on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Maximum relief scores for dose 3 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide maximum relief of dose 3 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Overall relief scores for dose 3 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide overall relief of dose 3 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Global Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4

Global evaluation, maximum relief, and overall relief scores for dose 4 were summarized with descriptive statistics. The subject was to provide a description for the Global Evaluation, maximum relief and overall relief of Dose 4 of study medication on an 11 point PI-NRS: Global Evaluation: rate the study medication as a pain-reliever; Maximum Pain Relief: maximum pain relief received from the last dose; Overall Pain Relief: overall quantity of pain relief received from the last dose. The range went from 0 (Very poor or No relief) to 10 (Excellent or Complete relief).

Time frame: At 48 hours or at time of rescue between 36 and 48 hours.

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Overall Relief for Dose 47.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.045
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Global Evalution for Dose 47.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.953
Ibuprofen 600mg ERGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Maximum Relief for Dose 47.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Global Evalution for Dose 44.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.715
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Maximum Relief for Dose 45.34 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.97
PlaceboGlobal Evaluation, Maximum Relief, and Overall Relief for Dose 4Overall Relief for Dose 44.89 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.803
Comparison: Global evaluation scores for dose 4 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide global evaluation of dose 4 study medication using a range that went from 0 (Very poor) to 10 (Excellent) units on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Maximum relief scores for dose 4 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide maximum relief of dose 4 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Comparison: Overall relief scores for dose 4 were summarized by descriptive statistics. Only non-missing values are used for the summary statistics. The subjects were to provide overall relief of dose 4 study medication on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS)in response to pain relief.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 1

Pain relief and pain intensity difference (PID) scores at individual time points were summarized by descriptive statistics. The PID at each time point prior to dose 2 was derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity, so that a higher value was indicative of a greater improvement. Range of possible scores could be from 0 (no improvement) to 5 (greatest possible improvement)

Time frame: 24, 36, 48 hours after taking Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 124 hours after dose 1.3.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.466
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 136 hours after dose 1.3.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.46
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 148 hours after dose 1.3.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.756
PlaceboPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 124 hours after dose 1.0.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.599
PlaceboPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 136 hours after dose 1.0.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.704
PlaceboPain Relief and PID Scores at Individual Time Points for Dose 148 hours after dose 1.0.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.721
Comparison: The pain relief and PID scores at individual time points were summarized by descriptive statistics. The test and reference were compared at each individual time point at 24, 36 and 48 hours.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1

Percentage of participants who require rescue medication (Lortab) at or prior to hour 8, hour 10 and hour 12 were reported and 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding parameters were calculated.

Time frame: 0-12 hours after taking Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 8 hours after dose 131.4 Percentage of participants
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 10 hours after dose 134.9 Percentage of participants
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 12 hours after dose 136.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 8 hours after dose 182.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 10 hours after dose 185.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication at or Prior to Hour 8, Hour 10, and Hour 12 After Taking Dose 1Rescue at or prior to 12 hours after dose 185.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The proportions of subjects who rescued at or prior to hour 8, hour 10, and hour 12 were reported and 95% confidence intervals for the corresponding parameters were calculated.p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Relief as Indicated by the Time Recorded on the Second Stopwatch Following First Perceptible Relief

Percentage(%) of subjects with confirmed first perceptible relief and meaningful relief after dose 1. Subjects that achieved both first perceptible relief and meaningful relief within the time allotted. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief is 240 minutes. Meaningful relief is a subjective definition, based on each subject's determination of pain

Time frame: Within 4 hours post Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPercentage of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Relief as Indicated by the Time Recorded on the Second Stopwatch Following First Perceptible Relief69 Percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Achieving Meaningful Relief as Indicated by the Time Recorded on the Second Stopwatch Following First Perceptible Relief17 Percent of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage (%) of Subjects With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief Within 1 Hour of Dose 1

Percentage (percentage of total) of subjects with first perceptible relief within 1 hour of Dose 1. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief was 240 minutes.

Time frame: Within 1 hour of Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERPercentage (%) of Subjects With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief Within 1 Hour of Dose 162 Percent of participants
PlaceboPercentage (%) of Subjects With Confirmed First Perceptible Relief Within 1 Hour of Dose 112 Percent of participants
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief

When the subject was administered study medication at Time 0, the Study Coordinator started 2 stopwatches. In an effort to determine the exact moment that the subject began to obtain noticeable pain relief, the subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when initial relief was observed and again when meaningful relief was achieved. Time to confirmed first perceptible relief was defined as the time to first perceptible relief, provided that the subject also later stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. The assigned censored time for No Pain Relief is 240 minutes.

Time frame: Within 4 hours post Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERTime to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief42.00 Minutes
PlaceboTime to Confirmed First Perceptible Relief240 Minutes
Comparison: Time to confirmed first perceptible relief was defined as the time to first perceptible relief, provided that the subject also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. For those who failed to achieve confirmed first perceptible and/or meaningful relief, a censored time was assigned.p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Time to Confirmed Meaningful Relief

When the subject was administered study medication at Time 0, the Study Coordinator started 2 stopwatches. To determine the exact moment that the subject began to notice pain relief, the subject was instructed to stop the stopwatch when initial relief was observed and again when meaningful relief was achieved. Time to confirmed meaningful relief was achieved if both stopwatches were stopped within the 4 hour observation period, when both initial and meaningful relief were observed. Meaningful relief is a subjective definition, based on each subjects determination of pain.

Time frame: Within 4 hours post Dose 1

Population: Intention to treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ibuprofen 600mg ERTime to Confirmed Meaningful Relief108 Minutes
PlaceboTime to Confirmed Meaningful Relief240 Minutes
Comparison: Time to confirmed first perceptible relief was defined as the time to first perceptible relief, provided that the subject also stopped the second stopwatch indicating meaningful relief. For those who failed to achieve confirmed first perceptible and/or meaningful relief, a censored time was assigned.p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026